Anaerobic threshold (AT) during exercise is usually noninvasively determined by assuming a two-segment mathematical relationship between two ventilatory parameters. In the literature, all the possible pairs of segments are first considered, and the most appropriate pair is then selected according to a least-squares method. In such a model, the AT is considered to be related to the joining point of the two segments. In order to test the reliability of the model, we compare the results of the least-squares method to those based on a maximum probability method in discriminating the two regression coefficients. In order to test the reproducibility of the two different criteria, comparisons have been repeated after data have been filtered. A paired t test was used to carry out comparisons. Ventilatory parameters were collected in 10 healthy subjects during the use of a bicycle ergometer. The required power was increased every 15 s by steps of 30 W, starting from 50 W. Ve, VO2 and VCO2 have been sampled every 15 s, then the three functions – Ve versus VO2, Ve versus VCO2 and VCO2 versus VO2 – were considered. Each function was stylized with two linear segments. Each segment was estimated by using a second-kind linear fitting. We verified that: (i) the AT may be reliably appreciated depending on the pair of selected parameters; (ii) only when data are smoothed is no difference between the two criteria documented (Ve vs. VO2, p = 0.99; Ve vs. VCO2, p = 0.54); (iii) no significant difference, related to smoothing, is documented both in using the least-squares method (Ve vs. VO2, p = 0.61; Ve vs. VCO2, p = 0.15) and the maximum p level criterion (Ve vs. VO2, p = 0.59; Ve vs. VCO2, p = 0.19)

Keywords:
Anaerobic threshold, Computerized clinical tests
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel
1989
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.