Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to examine whether (a) cyberbullying has unique associations with mental health problems, risk-taking, and self-harm behavior in victims and perpetrators when compared to school bullying and (b) if cyberbullying is associated with an additional burden for students already involved in school bullying. Methods: Data were collected from 6,561 students across 23 schools in Germany (grades 5–13). The sample was divided into the following four groups: cyber-only involvement (victims = 1.9%, perpetrators = 0.6%), school-only involvement (victims = 17.2%, perpetrators = 11.9%), dual involvement (victims = 5.7%, perpetrators = 2.9%), and noninvolvement (victims = 75.3%, perpetrators = 84.6%). Multilevel mixed-effects regression analysis was conducted to examine group differences in mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, KIDSCREEN-10), risk-taking, and self-harm behavior (e.g., substance use, suicide attempts). Results: Cyber-only bullying had unique associations with mental health problems and risk-taking behavior in victims (lower levels of peer relationship problems: p < 0.001, greater substance use: p < 0.05) and perpetrators (higher levels of peer relationship problems: p < 0.05) when compared to school-only bullying. Dual victims and perpetrators reported significantly more mental health problems (victims: χ2(5) = 221.58, p < 0.001; perpetrators: χ2(5) = 116.40, p < 0.001) and were more likely to report risk-taking and self-harm behavior (victims: χ2(7) = 115.15, p < 0.001; perpetrators: χ2(7) = 38.79, p < 0.001) than students involved in school-only bullying. Conclusion: Cyber-only bullying appears to be related to specific mental health issues beyond those associated with school-only bullying. Cyberbullying and school bullying go along with additive mental health problems, risk-taking, and self-harm behavior in both victims and perpetrators. Thus, bullying prevention and intervention programs should also target cyberbullying.
References
1.
Olweus
D
. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program
. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
. 1994 Oct
;35
(7
):1171
–90
.2.
Gaffney
H
, Farrington
DP
, Espelage
DL
, Ttofi
MM
. Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review
. Aggress Violent Behav
. 2019 Mar
;45
:134
–53
.3.
Smith
PK
, del Barrio
C
, Tokunaga
RS
. Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: how useful are the terms?
In: Bauman
S
, Cross
D
, Walker
J
, editors. Principles of cyberbullying research: definitions, measures, and methodology [Internet]
. New York (NY)
: Routledge
; 2012
. p. 26
–40
. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/defi-nitions-bullying-cyberbullying-useful-terms-peter-smith-cristina-del-barrio-robert-tokunaga/e/10.4324/9780203084601-14.4.
Fischer
SM
, John
N
, Melzer
W
, Kaman
A
, Winter
K
, Bilz
L
. Traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Germany – cross-sectional results of the 2017/18 HBSC study and trends
. J Health Monit
. 2020 Sep 16
;5
(3
):53
–68
. Available from: https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/6980.5.
Chudal
R
, Tiiri
E
, Brunstein Klomek
A
, Ong
SH
, Fossum
S
, Kaneko
H
, . Victimization by traditional bullying and cyberbullying and the combination of these among adolescents in 13 European and Asian countries
. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2021 Apr 21
. [cited 2021 May 16]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00787-021-01779-6.6.
Cosma
A
, Walsh
SD
, Chester
KL
, Callaghan
M
, Molcho
M
, Craig
W
, . Bullying victimization: time trends and the overlap between traditional and cyberbullying across countries in Europe and North America
. Int J Public Health
. 2020 Jan
;65
(1
):75
–85
.7.
Kowalski
RM
, Limber
SP
. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying
. J Adolesc Health
. 2013 Jul
;53
(1
):S13
–20
.8.
Waasdorp
TE
, Bradshaw
CP
. The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying
. J Adolesc Health
. 2015 May
;56
(5
):483
–8
.9.
Barzilay
S
, Brunstein Klomek
A
, Apter
A
, Carli
V
, Wasserman
C
, Hadlaczky
G
, . Bullying victimization and suicide ideation and behavior among adolescents in Europe: a 10-country study
. J Adolesc Health
. 2017 Aug
;61
(2
):179
–86
.10.
Jantzer
V
, Haffner
J
, Parzer
P
, Resch
F
, Kaess
M
. Does parental monitoring moderate the relationship between bullying and adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior? A community-based self-report study of adolescents in Germany
. BMC Public Health
. 2015 Dec
;15
(1
):583
–8
.11.
Ossa
FC
, Pietrowsky
R
, Bering
R
, Kaess
M
. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder among targets of school bullying
. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health
. 2019 Dec
;13
(1
):43
–11
.12.
Moore
SE
, Norman
RE
, Suetani
S
, Thomas
HJ
, Sly
PD
, Scott
JG
. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
. World J Psychiatry
. 2017
;7
(1
):60
.13.
Wolke
D
, Lereya
ST
. Long-term effects of bullying
. Arch Dis Child
. 2015 Sep
;100
(9
):879
–85
.14.
Jantzer
V
, Ossa
FC
, Eppelmann
L
, Parzer
P
, Resch
F
, Kaess
M
. Under the skin: does psychiatric outcome of bullying victimization in school persist over time? A prospective intervention study
. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
. 2021 Aug 16
.15.
Reed
KP
, Cooper
RL
, Nugent
WR
, Russell
K
. Cyberbullying: a literature review of its relationship to adolescent depression and current intervention strategies
. J Hum Behav Soc Environ
. 2016 Jan 2
;26
(1
):37
–45
.16.
Ybarra
ML
, Diener-West
M
, Leaf
PJ
. Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention
. J Adolesc Health
. 2007 Dec
;41
(6
):S42
–50
.17.
Bauman
S
, Toomey
RB
, Walker
JL
. Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students
. J Adolesc
. 2013 Apr
;36
(2
):341
–50
.18.
van Geel
M
, Vedder
P
, Tanilon
J
. Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis
. JAMA Pediatr
. 2014 May 1
;168
(5
):435
–42
.19.
Hase
CN
, Goldberg
SB
, Smith
D
, Stuck
A
, Campain
J
. Impacts of traditional bullying and cyberbullying on the mental health of middle school and high school students
. Psychol Sch
. 2015 Jul
;52
(6
):607
–17
.20.
Bonanno
RA
, Hymel
S
. Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying
. J Youth Adolesc
. 2013 May
;42
(5
):685
–97
.21.
Gini
G
, Card
NA
, Pozzoli
T
. A meta-analysis of the differential relations of traditional and cyber-victimization with internalizing problems
. Aggress Behav
. 2018 Mar
;44
(2
):185
–98
.22.
Vieno
A
, Gini
G
, Lenzi
M
, Pozzoli
T
, Canale
N
, Santinello
M
. Cybervictimization and somatic and psychological symptoms among Italian middle school students
. Eur J Public Health
. 2015 Jun 1
;25
(3
):433
–7
.23.
Sticca
F
, Perren
S
. Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying
. J Youth Adolesc
. 2013 May
;42
(5
):739
–50
.24.
Fletcher
A
, Fitzgerald-Yau
N
, Jones
R
, Allen
E
, Viner
RM
, Bonell
C
. Brief report: cyberbullying perpetration and its associations with socio-demographics, aggressive behaviour at school, and mental health outcomes
. J Adolesc
. 2014 Dec
;37
(8
):1393
–8
.25.
Cañas
E
, Estévez
E
, Martínez-Monteagudo
MC
, Delgado
B
. Emotional adjustment in victims and perpetrators of cyberbullying and traditional bullying
. Soc Psychol Educ
. 2020 Sep
;23
(4
):917
–42
.26.
Beckman
L
, Hagquist
C
, Hellström
L
. Does the association with psychosomatic health problems differ between cyberbullying and traditional bullying
. Emot Behav Diffic
. 2012 Sep
;17
(3–4
):421
–34
.27.
Gradinger
P
, Strohmeier
D
, Spiel
C
. Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: identification of risk groups for adjustment problems
. J Psychol
. 2009 Jan
;217
(4
):205
–13
.28.
Juvonen
J
, Graham
S
, Schuster
MA
. Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled
. Pediatrics
. 2003 Dec 1
;112
(6
):1231
–7
.29.
Copeland
WE
, Wolke
D
, Lereya
ST
, Shanahan
L
, Worthman
C
, Costello
EJ
. Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-grade systemic inflammation into adulthood
. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
. 2014 May 27
;111
(21
):7570
–5
.30.
Ossa
FC
, Jantzer
V
, Eppelmann
L
, Parzer
P
, Resch
F
, Kaess
M
. Effects and moderators of the Olweus bullying prevention program (OBPP) in Germany
. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2021 Nov
;30
(11
):1745
–54
.31.
Breivik
K
, Olweus
D
. An item response theory analysis of the Olweus bullying scale
. Aggress Behav
. 2015 Jan
;41
(1
):1
–13
.32.
Olweus
D
. The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire
. University of Bergen, Research Center for Health Promotion
; 1996
.33.
Goodman
R
. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire
. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2001 Nov
;40
(11
):1337
–45
.34.
The KIDSCREEN Group Europe
. Health-related quality of life screening instrument for children and adolescents – Deutsche Fassung [Internet]
. 2006
[cited 2021 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.redi-bw.de/db/ebsco.php/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3dpdx%26AN%3dPT9004990%26site%3dehost-live.35.
Nock
MK
, Holmberg
EB
, Photos
VI
, Michel
BD
. Self-Injurious thoughts and behaviors interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample
. Psychol Assess
. 2007
;19
(3
):309
–17
.36.
World Health Organisation & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
. Global school-based student health survey (GSHS) 2013 core questionnaire modules [Internet]
. 2013
[cited 2021 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/GSHS_Core_Modules_2013_English.pdf.37.
StataCorp
. Stata statistical software: release 16
. College Station (TX)
: StataCorp LLC
; 2019
.38.
Craig
W
, Harel-Fisch
Y
, Fogel-Grinvald
H
, Dostaler
S
, Hetland
J
, Simons-Morton
B
, . A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries
. Int J Public Health
. 2009 Sep
;54
(S2
):216
–24
.39.
Wang
J
, Iannotti
RJ
, Nansel
TR
. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber
. J Adolesc Health
. 2009 Oct
;45
(4
):368
–75
.40.
Scheithauer
H
, Hayer
T
, Petermann
F
, Jugert
G
. Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates
. Aggress Behav
. 2006 Jun
;32
(3
):261
–75
.41.
Gámez-Guadix
M
, Orue
I
, Smith
PK
, Calvete
E
. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents
. J Adolesc Health
. 2013 Oct
;53
(4
):446
–52
.42.
Hinduja
S
, Patchin
JW
. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide
. Arch Suicide Res
. 2010 Jul 28
;14
(3
):206
–21
.43.
König
A
, Gollwitzer
M
, Steffgen
G
. Cyberbullying as an act of revenge
. J Psychol Couns Sch
. 2010 Dec 1
;20
(2
):210
–24
.44.
Wolke
D
, Samara
MM
. Bullied by siblings: association with peer victimisation and behaviour problems in Israeli lower secondary school children
. J Child Psychol Psychiatry
. 2004 Jul
;45
(5
):1015
–29
.45.
Campbell
MA
, Whiteford
C
, Duncanson
K
, Spears
B
, Butler
D
, Slee
PT
. Cyberbullying bystanders: gender, grade, and actions among primary and secondary school students in Australia
. Int J Technoethics
. 2017 Jan
;8
(1
):44
–55
.46.
Olweus
D
. Cyberbullying: an overrated phenomenon
. Eur J Dev Psychol
. 2012 Sep
;9
(5
):520
–38
.47.
Wolke
D
, Lee
K
, Guy
A
. Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup
. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
. 2017 Aug
;26
(8
):899
–908
.© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2022
You do not currently have access to this content.
