Background: It is widely established that personality disorder has as broad negative impact on psychotherapy outcomes. Given the increased emphasis on dimensional traits for personality pathology in the DSM-5 and the proposal for the ICD-11, it is important to understand how traits are linked to treatment outcomes. Building on past research with general traits, we hypothesized that more nuanced and specific relations would be apparent. Furthermore, much of the past research has relied upon self-reports of personality and little is known about how ratings from therapists might be related to outcomes. Sampling and Methods: The present paper examined how dimensional traits from the Five-Factor Model predicted outcomes in a case series of 54 therapist-client dyads within a doctoral training clinic. Importantly, this extends past research as dimensional traits were rated by both therapists and clients at intake as well as sequentially over the course of therapy. Results: Correlations and regression analyses indicated that traits predicted a variety of outcomes including initial engagement in treatment as well as overall symptom reduction across therapy. Specifically, preliminary evidence suggests that therapist-rated conscientiousness at intake was positively related to clients’ early engagement in therapy. In addition, openness to experience after the 4th session – particularly as rated by the client – was predictive of long-term therapy outcomes. Conclusions: Broadly, these results provided preliminary information about the promise of dimensional models for improving the clinical utility of personality disorder diagnoses. More specifically, these results reinforced the relevance of personality assessment during therapy and indicated the potential predictive value of ratings by therapists and their clients.

Keywords:
Five-Factor Model, Openness, Conscientiousness, Self-report, Clinician, Personality disorder, Treatment outcome, Big Five
1.
Strupp HH: The outcome problem in psychotherapy revisited. Psychother Theory Res 1963; 1: 1–13.
2.
Kazdin AE: Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2007; 3: 1–27.
3.
Clarkin JF, Levy KN: The influence of client variables on psychotherapy; in Lambert ML (ed): Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, ed 6. Hoboken, Wiley, 2004, pp 194–226.
4.
Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS: Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59: 877–883.
5.
Luborsky L, Auerbach AH, Chandler M, Cohen J: Factors influencing outcome of psychotherapy: review of quantitative research. Psychol Bull 1971; 75: 145–85.
6.
Mulder RT, Joyce PR, Luty SE: The relationship of personality disorders to treatment outcome in depressed outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 259–264.
7.
Bieling PJ, MacQueen GM, Marriot MJ, Robb JC, Begin H, Joffe RT, et al: Longitudinal outcome in patients with bipolar disorder assessed by life-charting is influenced by DSM-IV personality disorder symptoms. Bipolar Disord 2003; 5: 14–21.
8.
Skodol AE, Morey LC, Bender DS, Oldham JM: The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5. Personal Disord 2013; 4: 342–349.
9.
Samuel DB, Griffin SA: A critical evaluation of retaining personality categories and types; in Huprich SK (ed): Personality Disorders: toward Theoretical and Empirical Integration of Diagnosis and Assessment. Washington, American Psychological Association, 2015.
10.
Widiger TA, Trull TJ: Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 71–83.
11.
Clark LA: Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 227–257.
12.
Conte HR, Plutchik R, Picard S, Karasu TB: Can personality traits predict psychotherapy outcome? Compr Psychiatry 1991; 32: 66–72.
13.
Steinert C, Klein S, Leweke F, Leichsenring F: Do personality traits predict outcome of psychodynamically oriented psychosomatic inpatient treatment beyond initial symptoms? Br J Clin Psychol 2015; 54: 109–125.
14.
Echeburua E, Fernandez-Montalvo J, Baez C: Predictors of therapeutic failure in slot-machine pathological gamblers following behavioural treatment. Behav Cogn Psychother 2001; 29: 379–383.
15.
Levy KN, Ellison WD, Scott LN, Bernecker SL: Attachment style. J Clin Psychol 2011; 67: 193–203.
16.
Ashton MC, Lee K, Goldberg LR: A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. J Pers Soc Psychol 2004; 87: 707–721.
17.
Westen D: A Clinical-empirical model of personality: life after the Mischelian Ice-Age and the Neo-Lithic Era. J Pers 1995; 63: 495–524.
18.
John OP, Naumann LP, Soto CJ: Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy; in John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA (eds): Handbook of Personality, ed 3. New York, Guilford, 2008, pp 114–158.
19.
Krueger RF, Markon KE: The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2014; 10: 477–501.
20.
Samuel DB, Widiger TA: A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2008; 28: 1326–1342.
21.
Miller TR: The psychotherapeutic utility of the 5-factor model of personality – a clinician experience. J Pers Assess 1991; 57: 415–433.
22.
Bagby RM, Gralnick TM, Al-Dajani N, Uliaszek AA: The role of the Five-Factor Model in Personality Assessment and Treatment Planning. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2016; 23: 365–381.
23.
Ogrodniczuk JS, Piper WE, Joyce AS, McCallum M, Rosie JS: NEO-five factor personality traits as predictors of response to two forms of group psychotherapy. Int J Group Psychother 2003; 53: 417–442.
24.
Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR: Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Odessa, PAR, 1992.
25.
Nieva G, Valero S, Bruguera E, Andion O, Trasovares MV, Gual A, et al: The alternative five-factor model of personality, nicotine dependence and relapse after treatment for smoking cessation. Addict Behav 2011; 36: 965–971.
26.
Bagby RM, Joffe RT, Parker JDA, Kalemba V, Harkness KL: Major depression and the 5-factor model of personality. J Pers Disord 1995; 9: 224–234.
27.
Quilty LC, De Fruyt F, Rolland JP, Kennedy SH, Rouillon PF, Bagby RM: Dimensional personality traits and treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2008; 108: 241–250.
28.
Samuel DB, Sanislow CA, Hopwood CJ, Shea MT, Skodol AE, Morey LC, et al: Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years. J Consult Clin Psychol 2013; 81: 650–659.
29.
Ray JV, Hall J, Rivera-Hudson N, Poythress NG, Lilienfeld SO, Morano M: The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: a meta-analytic review. Personal Disord 2013; 4: 1–14.
30.
Samuel DB: A review of the agreement between clinicians’ personality disorder diagnoses and those from other methods and sources. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2015; 22: 1–19.
31.
Westen D: Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: implications for research and the evolution of axis II. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154: 895–903.
32.
Samuel DB, Suzuki T, Griffin SA: Clinicians and clients disagree: five implications for clinical science. J Abnorm Psychol 2016; 125: 1001–1010.
33.
Morey LC, Shea MT, Markowitz JC, Stout RL, Hopwood CJ, Gunderson JG, et al: State effects of major depression on the assessment of personality and personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 528–535.
34.
Goodheart CD, Kazdin AE, Sternberg RJ: Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: Where Practice and Research Meet. Washington, American Psychological Association, 2006.
35.
Finn SE, Tonsager ME: Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: complementary paradigms. Psychol Assess 1997; 9: 374–385.
36.
Barkham M, Evans C, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Milne D, et al: The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. J Ment Health 1998; 7: 35–47.
37.
Mullins-Sweatt SN, Jamerson JE, Samuel DB, Olson DR, Widiger TA: Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment 2006; 13: 119–137.
38.
Friedman JNW, Oltmanns TF, Gleason MEJ, Turkheimer E: Mixed impressions: reactions of strangers to people with pathological personality traits. J Res Pers 2006; 40: 395–410.
39.
Widiger TA, Presnall JR: Clinical application of the five-factor model. J Pers 2013; 81: 515–527.
40.
Molloy GJ, O’Carroll RE, Ferguson E: Conscientiousness and medication adherence: a meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 2014; 47: 92–101.
41.
Boritz TZ, Angus L, Monette G, Hollis-Walker L, Warwar S: Narrative and emotion integration in psychotherapy: investigating the relationship between autobiographical memory specificity and expressed emotional arousal in brief emotion-focused and client-centred treatments of depression. Psychother Res 2011; 21: 16–26.
42.
Luminet O, Bagby RM, Wagner H, Taylor GJ, Parker JDA: Relation between alexithymia and the five-factor model of personality: a facet-level analysis. J Pers Assess 1999; 73: 345–358.
43.
McCallum M, Piper WE, Ogrodniczuk JS, Joyce AS: Relationships among psychological mindedness, alexithymia and outcome in four forms of short-term psychotherapy. Psychol Psychother 2003; 76: 133–144.
44.
Leweke F, Bausch S, Leichsenring F, Walter B, Stingl M: Alexithymia as a predictor of outcome of psychodynamically oriented inpatient treatment. Psychother Res 2009; 19: 323–331.
45.
Vazire S: Who knows what about a person? The Self-Other Knowledge Asymmetry (SOKA) model. J Pers Soc Psychol 2010; 98: 281–300.
46.
Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM: Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57: 1707–1722.
47.
Ganellen RJ: Assessing normal and abnormality personality functioning: strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. J Pers Assess 2007; 89: 30–40.
48.
Samuel DB, Bucher MA: Assessing the assessors: the feasibility and validity of clinicians as a source for personality disorder research. Personal Disord 2017; 8: 104–112.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.