Aim: The present study investigates the role of attachment representation and mentalization as possibly protective factors in the relationship between early maltreatment and potential for violence in adolescence. Methods: For the current study, 161 adolescents, aged 14-21 years, were recruited from high schools and youth psychiatry. Early maltreatment was assessed by the Childhood Experiences of Care and Abuse Questionnaire, attachment was assessed using the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System, and mentalization was coded with the Reflective Functioning Scale from Adult Attachment Interviews. Potential for violence was operationalized using the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, and the presence of conduct disorder was assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview. Using structural equation modeling, reflective functioning and attachment were tested as mediators on the direct effect of early maltreatment on potential for violence. Results: There was a direct effect of early maltreatment on potential for violence. Furthermore, this direct effect was partially mediated by reflective functioning but not by attachment representations. Discussion: The results contribute to the idea that mentalization serves as a protective factor that may suspend the pathway from early maltreatment to violence in adolescence. Because of the transformation of attachment patterns into generalized cognitive models of attachment, attachment in adolescence may have a less pronounced effect on violence in this specific developmental phase. Future studies should test for further group differences in community and clinical groups, which was not possible in the present study due to the limited sample size.

1.
Afifi TO, Brownridge DA, Cox BJ, Sareen J: Physical punishment, childhood abuse and psychiatric disorders. Child Abuse Negl 2006;30:1093-1103.
2.
Afifi TO, McMillan KA, Asmundson GJ, Pietrzak RH, Sareen J: An examination of the relation between conduct disorder, childhood and adulthood traumatic events, and posttraumatic stress disorder in a nationally representative sample. J Psychiatr Res 2011;45:1564-1572.
3.
Dube SR, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Chapman DP, Giles WH, Anda RF: Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. Pediatrics 2003;111:564-572.
4.
Horwitz AV, Widom CS, McLaughlin J, White HR: The impact of childhood abuse and neglect on adult mental health: a prospective study. J Health Soc Behav 2001;42:184.
5.
Jaffee SR, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Dodge KA, Rutter M, Taylor A, Tully LA: Nature × nurture: genetic vulnerabilities interact with physical maltreatment to promote conduct problems. Dev Psychopathol 2005;17:67-84.
6.
Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Bremner JD, Walker JD, Whitfield C, Perry BD, Giles WH: The enduring effects of abuse and related adverse experiences in childhood. A convergence of evidence from neurobiology and epidemiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006;256:174-186.
7.
Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW, Poulton R: Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 2002;297:851-854.
8.
Keenan K, Wroblewski K, Hipwell A, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M: Age of onset, symptom threshold, and expansion of the nosology of conduct disorder for girls. J Abnorm Psychol 2010;119:689-698.
9.
Weder N, Yang BZ, Douglas-Palumberi H, Massey J, Krystal JH, Gelernter J, Kaufman J: MAOA genotype, maltreatment, and aggressive behavior: the changing impact of genotype at varying levels of trauma. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65:417-424.
10.
Beauchaine TP, Webster-Stratton C, Reid MJ: Mediators, moderators, and predictors of 1-year outcomes among children treated for early-onset conduct problems: a latent growth curve analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005;73:371-388.
11.
Reyno SM, McGrath PJ: Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problems - a meta-analytic review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006;47:99-111.
12.
Blair R: A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath. Cognition 1995;57:1-29.
13.
Ha C, Sharp C, Goodyer I: The role of child and parental mentalizing for the development of conduct problems over time. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011;20:291-300.
14.
Taubner S, White LO, Zimmermann J, Fonagy P, Nolte T: Attachment-related mentalization moderates the relationship between psychopathic traits and proactive aggression in adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2013;41:929-938.
15.
Allen J, Porter M, McFarland C, McElhaney KB, Marsh P: The relation of attachment security to adolescents' parental and peer relationships, depression, and externalizing behavior. Child Dev 2007;78:1222-1239.
16.
van Ijzendoorn MH, Schuengel C, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ: Disorganized attachment in early childhood: meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Dev Psychopathol 1999;11:225-250.
17.
Main M: Desorganisation im Bindungsverhalten; in Sprangler G (ed): Die Bindungstheorie. Grundlagen, Forschung und Anwendung, ed 5. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 2009, pp 120-139.
18.
Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist E, Target M: Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. London, Karnac Books, 2002.
19.
van der Kolk BA, Fisler RE: Childhood abuse and neglect and loss of self-regulation. Bull Menninger Clin 1994;58:145-168.
20.
Chiesa M, Fonagy P: Reflective function as a mediator between childhood adversity, personality disorder and symptom distress. Personal Ment Health 2014;8:52-66.
21.
Fonagy P, Target M: Attachment and reflective function: their role in self-organization. Dev Psychopathol 1997;9:679-700.
22.
Taubner S, Curth C: Mentalization mediates the relation between early traumatic experiences and aggressive behavior in adolescence. Psihologija 2013;46:177-192.
23.
Butchart A, Harvey AP, Mian M, Fürniss T: Preventing Child Maltreatment: A Guide to Taking Action and Generating Evidence. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2006.
24.
Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Brähler E, Glaesmer H: Maltreatment in childhood and adolescence: results from a survey of a representative sample of the German population. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011;108:287-294.
25.
Chen P, Coccaro EF, Lee R, Jacobson KC: Moderating effects of childhood maltreatment on associations between social information processing and adult aggression. Psychol Med 2012;42:1293-1304.
26.
Jaffee SR: Family violence and parent psychopathology: implications for children's socioemotional development and resilience; in Goldstein S, Brooks RB (eds): Handbook of Resilience in Children. Boston, Springer, 2005, pp 127-142.
27.
Larzelere RE: Child outcomes of nonabusive and customary physical punishment by parents: an updated literature review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2000;3:199-221.
28.
Rosemond J: Proper socialization requires powerful love and equally powerful discipline; in Gelles RJ, Loseke DR (eds): Current Controversies on Family Violence. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2005, pp 131-136.
29.
Gershoff ET: Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2002;128:539-579.
30.
Gershoff ET: Spanking and child development: we know enough now to stop hitting our children. Child Dev Perspect 2013;7:133-137.
31.
Lansford JE, Sharma C, Malone PS, Woodlief D, Dodge KA, Oburu P, et al: Corporal punishment, maternal warmth, and child adjustment: a longitudinal study in eight countries. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2014;43:670-685.
32.
Taylor CA, Manganello JA, Lee SJ, Rice JC: Mothers' spanking of 3-year-old children and subsequent risk of children's aggressive behavior. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1057-e1065.
33.
Reebye P, Moretti MM, Wiebe V: Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in adolescents with conduct disorder: sex differences and onset patterns. Can J Psychiatry 2000;45:746-751.
34.
Allwood MA, Dyl J, Hunt JI, Spirito A: Comorbidity and service utlization among psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychol Trauma 2008;7:104-121.
35.
Kendall-Tackett KA, Williams LM, Finkelhor D: Impact of sexual abuse on children: a review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychol Bull 1993;113:164-180.
36.
MacMillan HL, Fleming JE, Streiner DL, Lin E, Boyle MH, Jamieson E, Beardslee WR: Childhood abuse and lifetime psychopathology in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1878-1883.
37.
Maniglio R: The impact of child sexual abuse on health: a systematic review of reviews. Clin Psychol Rev 2009;29:647-657.
38.
Molnar BE, Buka SL, Kessler RC: Child sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Public Health 2001;91:753-760.
39.
Pérez-Fuentes G, Olfson M, Villegas L, Morcillo C, Wang S, Blanco C: Prevalence and correlates of child sexual abuse: a national study. Compr Psychiatry 2013;54:16-27.
40.
Ensink K, Bégin M, Normandin L, Godbout N, Fonagy P: Mentalization and dissociation in the context of trauma: implications for child psychopathology. J Trauma Dissociation 2016, Epub ahead of print.
41.
Bowlby J: Attachment and Loss. Volume 1. Attachment. Munich, Reinhardt, 1969.
42.
Bretherton I, Munholland KA: Internal working models in attachment relationships: elaborating a central construct in attachment theory; in Cassidy J, Shaver P (eds): Handbook of Attachment - Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. New York, Guildford Press, 1999, pp 102-127.
43.
Bowlby J: Attachment and Loss. Volume 2. Separation - Anxiety and Anger. Munich, Reinhardt, 1973.
44.
Main M, Kaplan N, Cassidy J: Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: a move to the level of representation. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1985;50:66.
45.
Carlson V, Cicchetti D, Barnett D, Braunwald K: Disorganized/disoriented attachment relationships in maltreated infants. Dev Psychol 1989;25:525-531.
46.
Lyons-Ruth K, Alpern L, Repacholi B: Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Dev 1993;64:572-585.
47.
Mikulincer M, Shaver PR: An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2012;11:11-15.
48.
Allen J: Mentalizing in practice; in Allen J, Fonagy P (eds): Handbook of Mentalization-Based Treatment. Chichester, Wiley, 2006, pp 3-30.
49.
Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG: Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165:1127-1135.
50.
Fonagy P, Bateman AW, Luyten P: Introduction and overview; in Bateman AW, Fonagy P (eds): Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice. Washington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2012, pp 3-42.
51.
Bouchard M-A, Target M, Lecours S, Fonagy P, Tremblay L-M, Schachter A, Stein H: Mentalization in adult attachment narratives: reflective functioning, mental states, and affect elaboration compared. Psychoanal Psychol 2008;25:47-66.
52.
Simons KJ, Paternite CE, Shore C: Quality of parent/adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. J Early Adolesc 2001;21:182-203.
53.
Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Maughan A, Toth SL, Bruce J: False belief understanding in maltreated children. Dev Psychopathol 2003;15:1067-1091.
54.
Sharp C, Croudace TJ, Goodyer I: Biased mentalizing in children aged seven to 11: latent class confirmation of response styles to social scenarios and associations with psychopathology. Soc Dev 2007;16:181-202.
55.
Taubner S, Wiswede D, Nolte T, Roth G: Mentalisierung und externalisierende Verhaltensstörungen in der Adoleszenz. Psychotherapeut 2010;55:312-320.
56.
Yoon J, Hughes J, Gaur A, Thompson B: Social cognition in aggressive children: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Pract 1999;6:320-331.
57.
Bifulco A, Bernazzani O, Moran PM, Jacobs C: The Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q): validation in a community series. Br J Clin Psychol 2005;44:563-581.
58.
Bifulco A, Brown GW, Harris TO: Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse (CECA): a retrospective interview measure. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:1419-1435.
59.
Smith N, Lam D, Bifulco A, Checkley S: Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q). Validation of a screening instrument for childhood adversity in clinical populations. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2002;37:572-579.
60.
Vloet TD, von Polier GG, Herpertz- Dahlmann B, Raine A: The Reactive-Proactive Questionnaire. Psychometrikon, DOI: 10.6099/1000111.
61.
Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T: SKID-I und SKID-II: Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV: Achse I: Psychische Störungen/Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1997.
62.
Fonagy P, Target M, Steele H, Steele M: Reflective-Functioning Manual, Version 5.0, for Application to Adult Attachment Interviews. London, University College London, 1998.
63.
George C, Kaplan N, Main M: The Berkeley Adult Attachment Interview. Berkley, University of California, 1996.
64.
van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ: Attachment representations in mothers, fathers, adolescents, and clinical groups: a meta-analytic search for normative data. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:8-21.
65.
Taubner S: Konzept Mentalisieren: Eine Einführung in Forschung und Praxis. Bibliothek der Psychoanalyse. Giessen, Psychosozial-Verlag, 2015.
66.
George C, West M: The development and preliminary validation of a new measure of adult attachment: the adult attachment projective. Attach Hum Dev 2001;3:30-61.
67.
Cattell RB: A culture-free intelligence test. I. J Educ Psychol 1940;31:161-179.
68.
Cattell RB, Weiss RH: Grundintelligenztest - CFT 3. Braunschweig, Westermann, 1971.
69.
Muller RO, Hancock GR: Best practices in structural equation modeling; in Osborne JW (ed): Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2008.
70.
Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF: To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Modeling 2002;9:151-173.
71.
Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences, ed 3. New York, Guilford Press, 2011.
72.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics, ed 4. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
73.
Van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K: MICE: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw 2011;45:1-67.
74.
Schafer JL: Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. London/New York, Chapman & Hall, 1997, vol 72.
75.
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM: Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med 2011;30:377-399.
76.
Bodner TE: What improves with increased missing data imputations? Struct Equ Modeling 2008;15:651-675.
77.
Mîndrilă D: Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: a comparison of estimation bias with ordinal and multivariate non-normal data. Int J Digital Soc 2010;1:60-66.
78.
Steiger JH: Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behav Res 1990;25:173-180.
79.
Jöreskog KG, Sorbom D: Recent developments in structural equation modeling. J Marketing Res 1982;19:404-416.
80.
Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107:238-246.
81.
Rosseel Y: Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 2012;48:1-36.
82.
Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Bettge S, Erhart M: Psychische Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse aus der BELLA-Studie im Kinder- und Jugendgesundheitssurvey (KiGGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2007;50:871-878.
83.
Borelli JL, Compare A, Snavely JE, Decio V: Reflective functioning moderates the association between perceptions of parental neglect and attachment in adolescence. Psychoanal Psychol 2014;32:23-35.
84.
Lansford JE, Criss MM, Dodge KA, Shaw DS, Pettit GS, Bates JE: Trajectories of physical discipline: early childhood antecedents and developmental outcomes. Child Dev 2009;80:1385-1402.
85.
Ainsworth MS: Attachments beyond infancy. Am Psychol 1989;44:709-716.
86.
Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman A: Mentalizing in Clinical Practice, ed 1. Washington, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2008.
87.
Hartup WW: Friendships and their developmental significance; in McGurk H (ed): Childhood Social Development. Contemporary Perspectives. Hove, Erlbaum, 1992, pp 175-205.
88.
Grossmann K, Grossman KE: Die Bedeutung sprachlicher Diskurse für die Entwicklung internaler Arbeitsmodelle von Bindung; in Gloger-Tippelt G (ed): Aus dem Programm Huber. Psychologie Handbuch. Bindung im Erwachsenenalter. Ein Handbuch für Forschung und Praxis. Bern, Huber, 2001, pp 75-101.
89.
Raby KL, Cicchetti D, Carlson EA, Egeland B, Collins WA: Genetic contributions to continuity and change in attachment security: a prospective, longitudinal investigation from infancy to young adulthood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013;54:1223-1230.
90.
Waters E, Merrick S, Treboux D, Crowell J, Albersheim L: Attachment security in infancy and early adulthood: a twenty-year longitudinal study. Child Dev 2000;71:684-689.
91.
Zimmermann P: Bindungsentwicklung von der frühen Kindheit bis zum Jugendalter und ihre Bedeutung für den Umgang mit Freundschaftsbeziehungen; in Spangler G (ed): Die Bindungstheorie. Grundlagen, Forschung und Anwendung, ed 5. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 2009.
92.
Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH, Alink LRA: Cultural-geographical differences in the occurrence of child physical abuse? A meta-analysis of global prevalence. Int J Psychol 2013;48:81-94.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.