Current research in psychiatry is increasingly focused on empirical studies with methods and technologies adopted from medicine. This paper argues that psychiatry has a different epistemological basis from medicine, and it is on account of this that research in psychiatry demands a different approach, one that perforce focuses on the clarification of concepts central to psychiatric practice. This means undertaking conceptual analysis and conceptual history and only then moving on to empirical study. This paper highlights the crucial epistemological differences between the practice of medicine and psychiatry, showing that the latter is enacted at the level of language and communication. Consequently, the structures of psychiatric objects, namely, mental disorders and mental symptoms, are complexes of meaning derived from heterogeneous sources - both organic and semantic. Conceptual analysis of such structures is essential as ultimately the validity of empirical research is directly dependent on the conceptual clarification of its objects of inquiry.

Keywords:
Concept, Conceptual analysis, Epistemology, Mental symptoms, Hybrid structure
1.
Hempel CG: Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Foundations of the Unity of Science. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1952, vol II, pp 1-88.
2.
Murphy D: Psychiatry in the Scientific Image. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2002.
3.
Mechelen I, Hampton J, Michalski RS, and Theuns P: Categories and Concepts. London, Academic Press, 1993.
4.
Looke P (ed): The Nature of Concepts. London, Routledge, 1999.
5.
Peacocke C: A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MIT Books, 1992.
6.
Carey S: The Origin of Concepts. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.
7.
Weitz M: Theories of Concepts. London, Routledge, 1988.
8.
Abbagnano N: Dizionario di Filosofia, ed 3. Turin, UTET Libreria, 1998.
9.
Rakova M: The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and Theories of Concepts. London, Palgrave, 2003.
10.
Panaccio C: Conceptus; in Cassin B (ed): Vocabulaire européen des philosophies. Paris, Seuil, 2004, pp 248-250.
11.
Büttgen P, Crépon M, Laugier S: Begriff; in Cassin B (ed): Vocabulaire européen des philosophies. Paris, Seuil, 2004, pp171-175.
12.
Moss H, Hampton J (eds): Conceptual Representation. London, Psychology Press, 2009.
13.
Beuchot M: El Problema de los Universales. México, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 2010.
14.
Berrios GE, Marková IS: Visual hallucinations: history and context of current research; in Collerton D, Mosimann EP, Perry E (eds): The Neuroscience of Visual Hallucinations. London, Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, pp 3-22.
15.
Trim R: Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping. London, Palgrave, 2011.
16.
Grice P: Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1989.
17.
Jackson F: From Metaphysics to Ethics. A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.
18.
Koselleck R: The Practice of Conceptual History. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2002.
19.
Berrios GE: Historiography of mental systems and diseases. Hist Psychiatry 1994;5:175-190.
20.
Gadamer H-G: The History of Concepts and the Language of Philosophy. Int Stud Philos 1986;18:1-16.
21.
Meier HG: Begriffsgeschichte; in Ritter J (ed): Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft , 1971, vol 1, pp 788-808.
22.
Berrios GE: Hypochondriasis: history of the concept; in Starcevic VS, Lipsitt DR (eds): Hypochondriasis. Modern Perspectives on an Ancient Malady. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp 3-21.
23.
Wittgenstein L: Philosophical Investigations (translated by Anscombe GEM). Oxford, Blackwell, 1958.
24.
Berrios GE: The History of Mental Symptoms. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
25.
Aragona M: The role of comorbidity in the crisis of the current psychiatric classification system. Philos Psychiatry Psychol 2009;16:1-11.
26.
Cuthbert BN, Insel TR: Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med 2013;11:126.
27.
Cuthbert BN: The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2014;13:28-35.
28.
Insel TR, Cuthbert BN: Brain disorders? Precisely. Science 2015;348:499-500.
29.
Parnas J: The RDoC program: psychiatry without psyche? World Psychiatry 2014;13:46-47.
30.
Marková IS, Berrios GE: Neuroimaging in psychiatry: epistemological considerations; in Zachar P, Stoyanov DS, Aragona M, Jablensky A (eds): Alternative Perspectives on Psychiatric Validation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015, pp 112-127.
31.
Marková IS, Berrios GE: The epistemology of psychiatry. Psychopathology 2012;45:220-227.
32.
Gifford F (ed): Philosophy of Medicine. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2011.
33.
Sadegh-Zadeh K: Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine. Heidelberg, Springer, 2012.
34.
Johansson I, Lynøe N: Medicine and Philosophy. Heusenstamm, Ontos, 2008.
35.
Fried Y, Agassi J: Psychiatry as Medicine. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1983.
36.
Marková IS, Berrios GE: The epistemology of mental symptoms. Psychopathology 2009;42:343-349.
37.
Laudan L (ed): Mind and Medicine. Problems of Explanation and Evaluation in Psychiatry and the Biomedical Sciences. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983.
38.
Berrios GE, Marková IS: Conceptual Issues; in D'haenen H, den Boer JA, Willner P (eds): Biological Psychiatry. Chichester, Wiley, 2002, vol 1, pp 3-24.
39.
Porter R: A Social History of Madness. London, Phoenix Giants, 1987.
40.
Kirmayer LJ, Guzder J, Rousseau C (eds.): Cultural Consultation. Encountering the Other in Mental Health Care. New York, Springer, 2014.
41.
Beard DJ: Drapetomania - A Disease Called Freedom. Florida, Broward Public Library Foundation, 2000.
42.
Berrios GE, Marková IS: Towards a new epistemology of psychiatry; in Kirmayer LJ, Lemelson R, Cummings C (eds): Revisioning Psychiatry. Cultural Phenomenology, Critical Neuroscience and Global Mental Health. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp 41-64.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.