Background: This study explores the possibility that religious fundamentalism (RF) may be linked to deficits in personality structure, which is in contrast to the general assumption that religiosity and spirituality are positively related to mature personality development. Sampling andMethods: To test this hypothesis, 327 (232 female) college students completed the Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being together with the Innsbrucker Religious Fundamentalism Scale. In addition, the ‘vulnerable dark triad' of personality (‘vulnerable narcissism', subscale of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory; ‘secondary psychopathy', subscale of Levenson's Self-Report Psychopathy Scale; ‘borderline personality', of the Borderline Personality Inventory) was assessed. Results: In general, the relation between spirituality and healthy personality functioning was confirmed. In addition to greatly overlapping with ‘general religiosity' (p < 0.001), RF was also relevantly predicted by narcissistic (‘hiding the self') and borderline (‘primitive defenses') personality facets (p < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: Based on these preliminary data, we conclude that specific structural deficits in personality might lead to more rigorous variants of religious/spiritual beliefs such as RF. Further research in clinical surroundings as well as in religious extremist groups is recommended.

1.
Hill PC, Pargament KI: Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: implications for physical and mental health research. Am Psychol 2003;58: 64-74.
2.
Bennett K, Shepherd J, Janca A: Personality disorders and spirituality. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2013;26:79-83.
3.
Mora LE, Stavrinides P, McDermut W: Religious fundamentalism and religious orientation among the Greek orthodox. J Relig Health 2014;53:1498-1513.
4.
Hong RY, Koh S, Paunonen SV: Supernumerary personality traits beyond the big five: predicting materialism and unethical behavior. Pers Individ Dif 2012;53:710-715.
5.
Paunonen SV, Jackson DN: What is beyond the big five? Plenty! J Pers 2000;68:821-835.
6.
Paulhus DL, Williams KM: The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers 2002;36:556-563.
7.
Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL: The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2013;7:199-216.
8.
Miller JD, Dir A, Gentile B, Wilson L, Pryor LR, Campbell WK: Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. J Pers 2010;78:1529-1564.
9.
Wink P: Two faces of narcissism. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;61:590.
10.
Skeem JL, Polaschek DL, Patrick CJ, Lilienfeld SO: Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2011;12:95-162.
11.
Veselka L, Schermer JA, Vernon PA: Beyond the big five: the dark triad and the supernumerary personality inventory. Twin Res Hum Genet 2011;14:158-168.
12.
Ghorbani N, Watson P, Krauss SW, Bing MN, Davison HK: Social science as dialogue: narcissism, individualist and collectivist values, and religious interest in Iran and the United States. Curr Psychol 2004;23:111-123.
13.
Sansone RA, Kelley AR, Forbis JS: Religion/spirituality status and borderline personality symptomatology among outpatients in an internal medicine clinic. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2012;16:48-52.
14.
Unterrainer HF, Huber HP, Sorgo IM, Collicutt J, Fink A: Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and schizotypal personality. Pers Individ Dif 2011;51:360-364.
15.
Unterrainer H-F, Lewis AJ: The Janus face of schizotypy: enhanced spiritual connection or existential despair? Psychiatry Res 2014;220:233-236.
16.
Kämmerle M, Unterrainer H-F, Dahmen-Wassenberg P, Fink A, Kapfhammer H-P: Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and the dark triad of personality. Psychopathology 2014;47:297-302.
17.
Pincus AL, Ansell EB, Pimentel CA, Cain NM, Wright AG, Levy KN: Initial construction and validation of the pathological narcissism inventory. Psychol Assess 2009;21:365.
18.
Wright AG, Lukowitsky MR, Pincus AL, Conroy DE: The higher order factor structure and gender invariance of the pathological narcissism inventory. Assessment 2010;17:467-483.
19.
Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM: Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68:151.
20.
Leichsenring F: Borderline Persönlichkeits Inventar (BPI) (Borderline Personality Inventory). Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1997.
21.
Kernberg O: Borderline personality organization. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1967;15:641-685.
22.
Schnell T: SOS Abendland? Muslimischer Glaube und Integration. Int Z Sozialpsychol Gruppendyn Wirtsch Ges 2010;35:3-17.
23.
Unterrainer H-F, Lewis A, Fink A: Religious/spiritual well-being, personality and mental health: a review of results and conceptual issues. J Relig Health 2014;53:382-392.
24.
Unterrainer H-F, Ladenhauf KH, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Fink A: Different types of religious/spiritual well-being in relation to personality and subjective well-being. Int J Psychol Relig 2011;21:115-126.
25.
Unterrainer H-F, Fink A: Das multidimensionale Inventar zum religiös-spirituellen Befinden (MI-RSB): Normwerte für die österreichische Allgemeinbevölkerung [The Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (MI-RSWB): norm values for the Austrian general population]. Diagnostica 2013;59:33-45.
26.
Tinsley HE, Brown SD: Multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling; in Tinsley HEA, Brown SD (eds): Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling. San Diego, Academic Press, 2000, pp 3-36.
27.
Pargament KI, Ensing DS, Falgout K, Olsen H, Reilly B, Van Haitsma K, Warren R: God help me. I. Religious coping efforts as predictors of the outcomes to significant negative life events. Am J Community Psychol 1990;18:793-824.
28.
Kirkpatrick LA: A longitudinal study of changes in religious belief and behavior as a function of individual differences in adult attachment style. J Sci Stud Relig 1997;36:207-217.
29.
Genia V: I, E, quest, and fundamentalism as predictors of psychological and spiritual well-being. J Sci Stud Relig 1996;35:56-64.
30.
Schaap-Jonker H, Eurelings-Bontekoe E, Verhagen PJ, Zock H: Image of god and personality pathology: an exploratory study among psychiatric patients. Ment Health Relig Cult 2002;5:55-71.
31.
Hartz GW, Everett HC: Fundamentalist religion and its effect on mental health. J Relig Health 1989;28:207-217.
32.
Koenig HG: Concerns about measuring ‘spirituality' in research. J Nerv Ment Dis 2008;196:349-355.
33.
Altemeyer B, Hunsberger B: Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. Int J Psychol Relig 1992;2:113-133.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.