Abstract
Descriptive psychopathology makes a distinction between veridical perception and illusory perception. In both cases a perception is tied to a sensory stimulus, but in illusions the perception is of a false object. This article re-examines this distinction in light of new work in theoretical and computational neurobiology, which views all perception as a form of Bayesian statistical inference that combines sensory signals with prior expectations. Bayesian perceptual inference can solve the ‘inverse optics' problem of veridical perception and provides a biologically plausible account of a number of illusory phenomena, suggesting that veridical and illusory perceptions are generated by precisely the same inferential mechanisms.
References
1.
Friston K: The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci 2010;11:127-138.
2.
Clark A: Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci 2013;36:181-204.
3.
Knill DC, Pouget A: The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 2004;27:712-719.
4.
Howe CQ, Beau Lotto R, Purves D: Comparison of Bayesian and empirical ranking approaches to visual perception. J Theor Biol 2006;241:866-875.
5.
Berkeley G: A New Theory of Vision. London, Everyman's Library, 1976.
6.
Purves D, Wojtach WT, Lotto RB: Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:15588-15595.
7.
Friston K: A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005;360:815-836.
8.
Gold JI, Shadlen MN: The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007;30:535-574.
9.
Friston K: Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks 2003;16:1325-1352.
10.
Summerfield C, de Lange FP: Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014;15:745-756.
11.
Purves D, Monson BB, Sundararajan J, Wojtach WT: How biological vision succeeds in the physical world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:4750-4755.
12.
Gregory RL: Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing, ed 5. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997.
13.
Brown H, Friston KJ: Free-energy and illusions: the Cornsweet effect. Front Psychol 2012;3:43.
14.
Purves D, Lotto RB, Williams SM, Nundy S, Yang Z: Why we see things the way we do: evidence for a wholly empirical strategy of vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356:285-297.
15.
Shipley WC, Nann BM, Penfield MJ: The apparent length of tilted lines. J Exp Psychol 1949;39:548-551.
16.
Purves D, Shimpi A, Lotto RB: An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect. J Neurosci 1999;19:8542-8551.
17.
Lotto RB, Purves D: An empirical explanation of the Chubb illusion. J Cogn Neurosci 2001;13:547-555.
18.
Yang Z, Purves D: The statistical structure of natural light patterns determines perceived light intensity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:8745-8750.
19.
Howe CQ, Purves D: Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:1228-1233.
20.
Wojtach WT, Sung K, Truong S, Purves D: An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008;105:16338-16343.
21.
Morgenstern Y, Rukmini DV, Monson BB, Purves D: Properties of artificial neurons that report lightness based on accumulated experience with luminance. Front Comput Neurosci 2014;8:134.
22.
Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A: Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 2004;55:271-304.
23.
Kok P, Failing M, de Lange F: Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2014;26:1546-1554.
24.
Egner T, Monti JM, Summerfield C: Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. J Neurosci 2010;30:16601-16608.
25.
Meyer T, Olson CR: Statistical learning of visual transitions in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:19401-19406.
26.
Brown H, Adams RA, Parees I, Edwards M, Friston K: Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions. Cogn Process 2013;14:411-427.
27.
Stanghellini G, Broome MR: Psychopathology as the basic science of psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 2014;205:169-170.
28.
Casey P, Kelly B: Fish's Clinical Psychopathology: Signs and Symptoms in Psychiatry, ed 3. London, Gaskell, 2007.
29.
Jaspers K: General Psychopathology. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
30.
Barrett LF, Bar M: See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009;364:1325-1334.
31.
Oyebode F: Sims' Symptoms in the Mind: An Introduction to Descriptive Psychopathology, ed 4. Edinburgh, Elsevier, 2008.
32.
Semple D, Smyth R: Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry, ed 2. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
33.
James W: Psychology: The Briefer Course. Mineola, Dover Publications, 2001.
34.
Merleau-Ponty M: The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics (Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy). Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1964.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
