Background: In general, religious/spiritual dimensions are found to be negatively correlated with all kinds of psychiatric disorders such as depression, suicidal ideation and substance abuse. Contrary to these findings, the goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being (RSWB) and less favorable aspects of personality - the so-called ‘dark triad' of personality traits, i.e. narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy - together with general deficits in personality structure. Sampling and Methods: A total of 312 college students (220 females) completed the Multidimensional Inventory for RSWB, the revised Narcissistic Personality Inventory, the Machiavellianism Inventory and the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale along with the 16-item Inventory of Personality Organization. Results: RSWB was confirmed to be negatively correlated with these negative aspects of personality, in particular with subclinical psychopathy. More specifically, there were several notable overlaps; narcissism, for instance, was found to be significantly positively associated with some RSWB subdimensions such as ‘hope' or ‘connectedness'. Conclusions: First deductions can be made from these data concerning an ambivalent role of spirituality in impaired personality structure. These associations might be further investigated especially in psychiatric patients diagnosed with personality disorders in order to describe potential psychopathological facets of religion and spirituality more adequately.

Koenig HG, King DE, Carson VB: Handbook of Religion and Health, ed 2. New York, Oxford UP, 2012.
Piedmont RL: Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. J Pers 1999;67:985-1013.
Bennett K, Shepherd J, Janca A: Personality disorders and spirituality. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2013;26:79-83.
Unterrainer HF, Huber HP, Sorgo IM, Collicutt J, Fink A: Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and schizotypal personality. Pers Individ Dif 2011;51:360-364.
Piedmont RL: Personality, spirituality, religiousness, and the personality disorders: predictive relations and treatment implications; in Huguelet P, Koenig HG (eds): Religion and Spirituality in Psychiatry. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2009, pp 173-189.
Martens WH: Spiritual psychotherapy for antisocial and psychopathic personalities: some theoretical building blocks. J Contemp Psychother 2003;33:205-218.
Douglas J, Burgess AW, Burgess AG, Ressler RK: Crime Classification Manual: A Standard System for Investigating and Classifying Violent Crime. New York, Wiley, 2013.
Paulhus DL, Williams KM: The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers 2002;36:556-563.
Kernberg OF: Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven/London, Yale UP, 1984.
Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL: The dark triad of personality: a 10 year review. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2013;7:199-216.
Raskin RN, Hall CS: A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychol Rep 1979;45;590.
Christie R, Geis FL: Studies of Machiavellianism. New York, Academic Press, 1970.
Lenzenweger MF, Clarkin JF, Kernberg OF, Foelsch PA: The Inventory of Personality Organization: psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in nonclinical sample. Psychol Assess 2001;13:577-591.
Unterrainer HF, Ladenhauf KH, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Fink A: Different types of religious/spiritual well-being in relation to personality and subjective well-being. Int J Psychol Relig 2011;21:115-126.
Unterrainer HF, Ladenhauf KH, Moazedi ML, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Fink A: Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being and their relation to personality and psychological well-being. Pers Individ Dif 2010;49:192-197.
Unterrainer HF, Lewis AJ, Collicutt J, Fink A: Religious/spiritual well-being, coping styles, and personality dimensions in people with substance use disorders. Int J Psychol Relig 2013;23:204-213.
Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM: Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68:151-158.
Zimmermann J, Benecke C, Hörz S, Rentrop M, Peham D, Bock A, Wallner T, Schauenburg H, Frommer J, Huber D, Clarkin JF, Dammann G: Validierung einer deutschsprachigen 16-Item-Version des Inventars der Persönlichkeitsorganisation (IPO-16). Diagnostica 2013;59:3-16.
Unterrainer HF, Schöggl H, Fink A, Neuper C, Kapfhammer HP: Soul darkness? Dimensions of religious/spiritual well-being among mood disordered in-patients compared to healthy controls. Psychopathology 2012;45:310-316.
Unterrainer HF, Fink A: Das Multidimensionale Inventar zum religiös-spirituellen Befinden (MI-RSB): Normwerte für die österreichische Allgemeinbevölkerung [The Multidimensional Inventory for Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (MI-RSWB): norm values for the Austrian general population]. Diagnostica 2013;1:33-44.
Dahmen-Wassenberg P, Kämmerle M, Unterrainer HF, Fink A: The relation between different facets of creativity and the dark side of personality. Creative Res J, submitted.
Wiedl E: The Dark Triad and Faking; diploma thesis, Karl Franzens University Graz, unpubl.
Veselka L, Schermer JA, Vernon PA: The dark triad and an expanded framework of personality. Pers Individ Dif 2012;53:417-425.
Rauthmann JF, Will T: Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Soc Behav Pers 2011;39:391-404.
Rosenthal SA, Hooley JM: Narcissism assessment in social-personality research: does the association between narcissism and psychological health result from a confound with self-esteem? J Res Pers 2010;44:453-465.
Goncalo JA, Flynn FJ, Kim SH: Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2010;36:1484-1495.
Miller JD, Dir A, Gentile B, Wilson L, Pryor LR, Campbell WK: Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. J Pers 2010;78:1529-1564.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.