Karl Jaspers laid the foundations of contemporary psychopathology. Among Jaspers' contributions was his powerful vision of psychiatry as a crucial way to shed light on the human condition and existence by integrating the scientific study of psychic diseases with a theoretical approach focused on human experience. This perspective should be revitalized. In the present paper we start from the role Jaspers assigns to the body when discussing the notion of ‘personalization'. We explore the relationship between a minimal notion of the self, the ‘bodily self', and its potentiality for movement - the self's ‘power for action'. Based on recent empirical evidence, we then propose a connection between the implicit bodily self-experience and important psychopathological aspects of schizophrenia by showing that schizophrenic patients exhibit a disruption of implicit bodily self-knowledge. We propose that the bodily nature of the implicitly experiencing self might enable the continuum of experience along which all visions of the world are located - both in healthy and psychotic individuals. The power for action might provide the possibility to give form to the bodily presence characterizing in the first place our being selves.

Keywords:
Neurosciences, Psychopathology, Schizophrenia
1.
Spiegelberg H: Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry. A Historical Introduction. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1972.
2.
Jaspers K: General Psychopathology. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
3.
Jaspers K: Rechenschaft und ausblich. Munich, Piper, 1958.
4.
Gallese V, Sinigaglia C: The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:746-755.
5.
Gallese V, Sinigaglia C: How the body in action shapes the self. J Consciousness Stud 2011;18:117-143.
6.
Parnas J: The self and intentionality in the pre-psychotic stages of schizophrenia: a phenomenological study; in Zahavi D (ed): Exploring the Self: Philosophical and Psychopatological Perspectives on Self-Experience. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2000, pp 115-148.
7.
Parnas J: Self and schizophrenia: a phenomenological perspective; in Kircher T, David A (eds): The Self in Neuroscience and Psychiatry. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp 127-141.
8.
Cermolacce M, Naudin J, Parnas J: The ‘minimal self' in psychopathology: re-examining the self-disorders in the schizophrenia spectrum. Conscious Cogn 2007;16:703-714.
9.
Tsakiris M, Hesse MD, Boy C, Haggard P, Fink GR: Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:2235-2244.
10.
Tsakiris M, Haggard P: Experimenting with the acting self. Cogn Neuropsychol 2005;22:387-407.
11.
Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P: Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 2006;15:423-432.
12.
Tsakiris M, Schutz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S: On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious Cogn 2007;16:645-660.
13.
Jeannerod M: Being oneself. J Physiol Paris 2007;101:161-168.
14.
Jeannerod M: Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:1419-1432.
15.
Gallese V: Mirror neurons and intentional attunement: commentary on olds. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2006;54:47-57.
16.
Gallese V: The inner sense of action. Agency and motor representations. J Consciousness Stud 2000;7:23-40.
17.
Gallese V: Motor abstraction: a neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychol Res 2009;73:486-498.
18.
Smith AJT: Bodily Experience and Bodily Self Knowledge: Feeling and Knowing Oneself as a Physical Agent; Master's thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2007, p 53.
19.
Ferri F, Frassinetti F, Costantini M, Gallese V: Motor simulation and the bodily self. PLoS One 2011;6:e17927.
20.
Parsons LM: Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994;20:709-730.
21.
Decety J, Jeannerod M, Germain M, Pastene J: Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort. Behav Brain Res 1991;42:1-5.
22.
Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, Diamond ME, Baraldi P, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, di Prampero PE: Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 1996;16:7688-7698.
23.
Petit LS, Pegna AJ, Mayer E, Hauert CA: Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: mental rotation of a body segment. Brain Cogn 2003;51:95-101.
24.
Thayer ZC, Johnson BW, Corballis MC, Hamm JP: Perceptual and motor mechanisms for mental rotation of human hands. Neuroreport 2001;12:3433-3437.
25.
Cooper LA, Shepard RN: Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1975;104:48-56.
26.
Parsons LM: Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. J Exp Psychol Gen 1987;116:172-191.
27.
Ferri F, Frassinetti F, Ardizzi M, Costantini M, Gallese V: A sensorimotor network for the bodily self. J Cogn Neurosci 2012;24:1584-1595.
28.
Alivisatos B, Petrides M: Functional activation of the human brain during mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:111-118.
29.
Cohen MS, Kosslyn SM, Breiter HC, DiGirolamo GJ, Thompson WL, Anderson AK, Brookheimer SY, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW: Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI. Brain 1996;119:89-100.
30.
Kosslyn SM, DiGirolamo GJ, Thompson WL, Alpert NM: Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology 1998;35:151-161.
31.
Parsons LM, Fox PT, Downs JH, Glass T, Hirsch TB, Martin CC, Jerabek PA, Lancaster JL: Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 1995;375:54-58.
32.
Podzebenko K, Egan GF, Watson JD: Real and imaginary rotary motion processing: functional parcellation of the human parietal lobe revealed by fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 2005;17:24-36.
33.
Seurinck R, Vingerhoets G, de Lange FP, Achten E: Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences? Neuroimage 2004;23:1440-1449.
34.
Vingerhoets G, de Lange FP, Vandemaele P, Deblaere K, Achten E: Motor imagery in mental rotation: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002;17:1623-1633.
35.
Arzy S, Overney LS, Landis T, Blanke O: Neural mechanisms of embodiment: Asomatognosia due to premotor cortex damage. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1022-1025.
36.
Berti A, Bottini G, Gandola M, Pia L, Smania N, Stracciari A, Castiglioni I, Vallar G, Paulesu E: Shared cortical anatomy for motor awareness and motor control. Science 2005;309:488-491.
37.
Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE: That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004;305:875-877.
38.
Hodzic A, Muckli L, Singer W, Stirn A: Cortical responses to self and others. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:951-962.
39.
Myers A, Sowden PT: Your hand or mine? The extrastriate body area. Neuroimage 2008;42:1669-1677.
40.
Sugiura M, Sassa Y, Jeong H, Miura N, Akitsuki Y, Horie K, Sato S, Kawashima R: Multiple brain networks for visual self-recognition with different sensitivity for motion and body part. Neuroimage 2006;32:1905-1917.
41.
Frassinetti F, Maini M, Benassi M, Avanzi S, Cantagallo A, Farne A: Selective impairment of self body-parts processing in right brain-damaged patients. Cortex 2010;46:322-328.
42.
Frassinetti F, Maini M, Romualdi S, Galante E, Avanzi S: Is it mine? Hemispheric asymmetries in corporeal self-recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20:1507-1516.
43.
Frassinetti F, Pavani F, Zamagni E, Fusaroli G, Vescovi M, Benassi M, Avanzi S, Farne A: Visual processing of moving and static self body-parts. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:1988-1993.
44.
Tsakiris M: My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:703.
45.
Frassinetti F, Ferri F, Maini M, Benassi MG, Gallese V: Bodily self: an implicit knowledge of what is explicitly unknown. Exp Brain Res 2011;212:153-160.
46.
Berti A, Frassinetti F, Umilta C: Nonconscious reading? Evidence from neglect dyslexia. Cortex 1994;30:181-197.
47.
Berti A, Rizzolatti G: Visual processing without awareness: evidence from unilateral neglect. J Cogn Neurosci 1992;4:345-351.
48.
Tamietto M, Cauda F, Corazzini L, Savazzi S, Marzi C, Goebel R, Weiskrantz L, de Galder B: Collicular vision guides non-conscious behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22:888-902.
49.
Rochat P: Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Conscious Cogn 2003;12:717-731.
50.
Rochat P: The innate sense of the body develops to become a public affair by 2-3 years. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:738-745.
51.
Ferri F, Frassinetti F, Mastrangelo F, Salone A, Ferro FM, Gallese V: Bodily self and schizophrenia: the loss of implicit self-body knowledge. Conscious Cogn 2012;21:1365-1374.
52.
Sass L, Parnas J: Explaining schizophrenia: the relevance of phenomenology; in Chung MC, Fulford KWM, Graham G (eds): Reconceiving Schizophrenia. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp 63-95.
53.
Sass LA, Parnas J: Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophr Bull 2003;29:427-444.
54.
Fuchs T: Corporealized and disembodied minds: a phenomenological view of the body in melancholia and schizophrenia. Philos Psychiatr Psychol 2005;12:95-107.
55.
Stanghellini G: Embodiment and schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 2009;8:56-59.
56.
Daprati E, Franck N, Georgieff N, Proust J, Pacherie E, Dalery J, Jeannerod M: Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition 1997;65:71-86.
57.
Thakkar KN, Nichols HS, McIntosh LG, Park S: Disturbances in body ownership in schizophrenia: evidence from the rubber hand illusion and case study of a spontaneous out-of-body experience. PLoS One 2011;6:e27089.
58.
Merleau-Ponty M: Les relations avec autrui chez l'enfant; in: The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1964.
59.
Dillon M: Merleau-ponty's ontology. Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1997.
60.
Gallese V: The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 2003;36:171-180.
61.
Gallese V, Keysers C, Rizzolatti G: A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:396-403.
62.
Keysers C, Gazzola V: Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009;19:666-671.
63.
Craig AD: How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002;3:655.
64.
Karnath HO, Baier B: Right insula for our sense of limb ownership and self-awareness of actions. Brain Struct Funct 2010;214:411-417.
65.
Ebisch SJ, Salone A, Ferri F, De Berardis D, Romani GL, Ferro FM, Gallese V: Out of touch with reality? Social perception in first-episode schizophrenia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012.
66.
Frith CD: The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action. Psychol Med 1987;17:631-648.
67.
Blakemore SJ, Smith J, Steel R, Johnstone CE, Frith CD: The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychol Med 2000;30:1131-1139.
68.
Vinogradov S, Luks TL, Schulman BJ, Simpson GV: Deficit in a neural correlate of reality monitoring in schizophrenia patients. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:2532-2539.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.