Background: Football (soccer) betting, as a strategic form of betting, became one of the favorite wagers for pathological gamblers. Previous studies demonstrated the psychological and biological significance of the ‘illusion of control’ (personal control) and ‘near miss’ results in gambling. In our study, we explored whether knowledge and expertise of pathological sports gamblers can ensure a successful bet. Sample and Methods: Participants were divided into three groups of individuals – pathological gamblers, amateurs and laypersons – and were asked to predict in advance the general result and the exact result of football matches in the European Champions League Round of 16. Results: The 165 participants included 53 pathological sports gamblers (52 males and 1 female), 78 laypersons (45 females and 33 males) and 34 amateurs (all males). After a thorough statistical analysis, we found no significant differences between the groups, no matter what kind of previous knowledge they had acquired. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the ‘illusion of control’ of pathological gamblers, attained by knowledge of the game and its latest data and information (especially in a strategic gamble as football betting), has no factual background. Moreover, our study demonstrates without a doubt that there is no significant difference between the male pathological sports gamblers group and the male/female laypersons group.

Keywords:
Football, Pathological gambling, Strategic versus nonstrategic gambling, Illusion of control
1.
Dannon PN, Lowengrub K, Gonopolski Y, Musin E, Kotler M: Pathological gambling: a review of phenomenological models and treatment modalities for an underrecognized psychiatric disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;8:334–339.
2.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
3.
World Health Organization: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992.
4.
Dannon PN, Lowengrub K, Aizer A, Kotler M: Pathological gambling: comorbid psychiatric diagnoses in patients and their families. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2006;43:88–92.
5.
Moran E: Clinical and social aspects of risk-taking. Proc R Soc Med 1970;63:1273–1277.
6.
Moran E: Varieties of pathological gambling. Br J Psychiatry 1970;116:593–597.
7.
Steel Z, Blaszczynski A: The factorial structure of pathological gambling. J Gambl Stud 1996;12:3–20.
8.
Iancu I, Lowengrub K, Dembinsky Y, Kotler M, Dannon PN: Pathological gambling: an update on neuropathophysiology and pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs 2008;22:123–138.
9.
Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, et al: Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction 2006;101:534–547.
10.
Toneatto T, Blitz-Miller T, Calderwood K, Dragonetti R, Tsanos A: Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. J Gambl Stud 1997;13:253–266.
11.
Cote D, Caron A, Aubert J, Desrochers V, Ladouceur R: Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. J Gambl Stud 2003;19:433–438.
12.
Kassinove JI, Schare ML: Effects of the ‘near miss’ and the ‘big win’ on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychol Addict Behav 2001;15:155–158.
13.
Davis D, Sundahl I, Lesbo M: Illusory personal control as a determinant of bet size and type in casino craps games. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:1224–1242.
14.
Ladouceur R, Mayrand M: The level of involvement and the timing of betting in roulette. J Psychol 1987;121:169–176.
15.
Clark L, Lawrence AJ, Astley-Jones F, Gray N: Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron 2009;61:481–490.
16.
Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Tomasi D, Zhang L, Cottone LA, Maloney T, Telang F, Caparelli EC, Chang L, Ernst T, Samaras D, Squires NK, Volkow ND: Is decreased prefrontal cortical sensitivity to monetary reward associated with impaired motivation and self-control in cocaine addiction? Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:43–51.
17.
Potenza MN, Leung HC, Blumberg HP, et al: An fMRI Stroop task study of ventromedial prefrontal cortical function in pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:1990–1994.
18.
van Holst RJ, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE: Brain imaging studies in pathological gambling. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2010;12:418–425.
19.
Delfabbro PH, Winefield AH: Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. J Psychol 2000;134:117–128.
20.
Toneatto T: Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Subst Use Misuse 1999;34:1593–1604.
21.
Scoboria A, Wilson T: Memory for future gambling wins. Psychol Addict Behav 2011;25:565–572.
22.
Khazaal Y: ISAM/CSAM Annual Conference. Effects of Expertise on Football Betting. Geneva University Hospital, Department of Addictology, 2010.
23.
Odlaug BL, Marsh PJ, Kim SW, Grant JE: Strategic vs nonstrategic gambling: characteristics of pathological gamblers based on gambling preference. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2011;23:105–112.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.