Background: Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs) are video games in which a large number of players interact with one another in a persistent virtual world. MMORPGs can become problematic and result in negative outcomes in daily living (e.g. loss of control on gaming behaviors, compromised social and individual quality of life). The aim of the present study is to investigate psychological predictors of problematic involvement in MMORPGs. Sampling and Methods: Fifty-four males who played MMORPGs regularly were recruited in cybercafés and screened using the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale (which assesses 4 facets of impulsivity) and the Motivation to Play Online Questionnaire (which assesses personal motives to play online). Negative consequences due to excessive time spent on the Internet were assessed with the Internet Addiction Test. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed that problematic use of MMORPGs is significantly predicted by: (1) high urgency (b = 0.45), and (2) a motivation to play for immersion (b = 0.35). Conclusion: This study showed that, for certain individuals (who are characterized by a proneness to act rashly in emotional contexts and motivated to play to be immersed in a virtual world), involvement in MMORPGs can become problematic and engender tangible negative consequences in daily life.

Keywords:
Impulsivity, UPPS, Motivation, MMORPG, Internet, Addiction, Video games, Self-regulation, World of Warcraft
1.
Yee N: The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively-multiuser online graphical environments. Presence 2006;15:309–329.
2.
Hussain Z, Griffiths MD: Excessive use of massively multi-player online role-playing games: a pilot study. Int J Ment Health Addict 2009;7:563–571.
3.
Smyth J: Beyond self-selection in video game play: an experimental examination of the consequences of massively multiplayer online role-playing game play. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007;10:717–721.
4.
Young K: Understanding online gaming addiction and treatment issues for adolescents. Am J Fam Ther 2009;37:355–372.
5.
Gentile DA: Pathological video game use among youth 8 to 18: a national study. Psychol Sci 2009;20:594–602.
6.
Peters CS, Malesky LA: Problematic usage among highly-engaged players of massively multiplayer online role playing games. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008;11:481–484.
7.
Kim EJ, Namkoong K, Ku T, Kim SJ: The relationship between online game addiction and aggression, self-control and narcissistic personality traits. Eur Psychiatry 2008;23:212–218.
8.
Young KS: Internet addictions: symptoms, evaluation and treatment; in Vande Creek L, Jackson T (eds): Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book. Sarasota, Professional Resource Press, 1999, pp 19–31.
9.
Whiteside SP, Lynam DR: The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers Indiv Dif 2001;30:669–689.
10.
Anestis MD, Anestis JC, Selby EA, Joiner TE: Anger rumination across forms of aggression. Pers Individ Dif 2009;46:192–196.
11.
Miller JD, Campbell WK, Young DL, Lakey CE, Reidy DE, Zeichner A, Goodie AS: Examining the relations among narcissism, impulsivity, and self-defeating behaviours. J Pers 2009;77:761–793.
12.
Evenden J: Impulsivity: a discussion of clinical and experimental findings. J Psychopharmacol 1999;13:180–192.
13.
Smith GT, Fischer S, Cyders MA, Annus AM, Spillane NS, McCarthy DM: On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits. Assessment 2007;14:155–170.
14.
Billieux J, Rochat L, Rebetez MML, Van der Linden M: Are all facets of impulsivity related to self-reported compulsive buying behavior? Pers Indiv Diff 2008;44:1432–1442.
15.
Billieux J, Van der Linden M, d’Acremont M, Ceschi G, Zermatten A: Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence and actual use of the mobile phone? Appl Cogn Psychol 2007;21:527–537.
16.
Billieux J, Van der Linden M, Rochat L: The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Appl Cogn Psychol 2008;22:1195–1210.
17.
Yee N: Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9:772–775.
18.
Wan CS, Chiou WB: Psychological motives and online games addiction: a test of flow theory and humanistic needs theory for Taiwanese adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006;9:317–324.
19.
Ng BD, Malesky LA: Addiction to the internet and online gaming. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:110–113.
20.
Van der Linden M, d’Acremont M, Zermatten A, Jermann F, Laroi F, Willems S, Juillerat AC, Bechara A: A French adaptation of the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale: confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of undergraduates. Eur J Psychol Assess 2006;22:38–42.
21.
Khazaal Y, Billieux J, Thorens G, Khan R, Louati Y, Scarlatti E, Theintz F, Lederrey J, Van der Linden M, Zullino D: French validation of the Internet addiction test. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;11:703–706.
22.
Velicer WF: Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 1976;41:321–327.
23.
Yee N: Facets: 5 motivations factors for why people play MMORPG’s. 2002. http://www.nickyee.com/facets/home.html.
24.
Lance CE: Mallows’ Cp statistic; in Everitt D, Howell DC (eds): Encyclopedia of Behavioral Statistics. New York, Wiley, 2005.
25.
Hercerg-Hurn MD, Mirosevich VM: Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Am Psychol 2008;63:591–601.
26.
Verdejo-García A, Bechara A, Recknor EC, Pérez-García M: Negative emotion-driven impulsivity predicts substance dependence problems. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;91:213–219.
27.
Anestis MD, Selby EA, Joiner TE: The role of urgency in maladaptive behaviors. Behav Res Ther 2007;45:3018–3029.
28.
Billieux J, Van der Linden M, Ceschi G: Which dimensions of impulsivity are related to cigarette craving? Addict Behav 2007;32:1189–1199.
29.
Bechara A, Van der Linden M: Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Curr Opin Neurol 2005;18:734–739.
30.
Gay P, Rochat L, Billieux J, d’Acremont M, Van der Linden M: Heterogeneous inhibition processes involved in different facets of self-reported impulsivity: evidence from a community sample. Acta Psychol 2008;129:332–339.
31.
Dolan SL, Bechara A, Nathan PE: Executive dysfunction as a risk marker for substance abuse: the role of impulsive personality traits. Behav Sci Law 2008;26:799–822.
32.
Xiao L, Bechara A, Grenard LJ, Stacy WA, Palmer P, Wei Y, Jia Y, Fu X, Johnson CA: Affective decision-making predictive of Chinese adolescent drinking behaviors. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009;15:547–557.
33.
Cyders MA, Smith GT: Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency. Psychol Bull 2008;134:807–828.
34.
Cyders MA, Flory K, Rainer S, Smith GT: The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first year college drinking. Addiction 2009;104:193–202.
35.
Cyders MA, Smith GT, Spillane NS, Fischer S, Annus AM, Peterson C: Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychol Assess 2007;19:107–118.
36.
Jacobs DF: A general theory of addictions: a new theoretical model. J Gamb Behav 1986;2:15–31.
37.
Miltenberger RG, Redlin J, Crosby R, Stickney M, Mitchell J, Wonderlich S, Faber R, Smyth J: Direct and retrospective assessment of factors contributing to compulsive buying. J Behav Ther Exp Psychol 2003;34:1–9.
38.
Caplan SE: Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007;10:234–242.
39.
Dunning D, Heath C, Suls J: Flawed self-assessment. Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2004;5:69–106.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.