Background: Neurasthenia was defined over a century ago. In view of a questionable clinical validity, it was omitted from the 3rd edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM, while it remains as an own diagnostic category in the WHO’s ICD-10. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to examine the clinical validity of ICD-10 neurasthenia in a consecutive sample of chronic pain patients. Patients and Methods: We included 193 patients (mean age 45.1, SD ± 10.2, 63% females) in the study. Psychiatric diagnoses were established by the use of ICD-10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research. In addition, the Screening List for Somatization Symptoms was administered: self-rating of 53 medically unexplained somatic symptoms, and 11 additional screening questions concerning weakness after slight mental or physical exertion and disease conviction. Results: Thirty-three percent of the patients who fulfilled the criteria of ICD-10 neurasthenia also fulfilled the criteria of ICD-10 somatization disorder, 69% the criteria of ICD-10 undifferentiated somatoform disorder, 14% the criteria of ICD-10 hypochondriacal disorder, 66% the criteria of ICD-10 somatoform autonomic dysfunction, 85% the criteria of ICD-10 persistent somatoform pain disorder and 14% the criteria for sexual dysfunction not caused by organic disorder or disease. The symptom profile of ICD-10 neurasthenia was not clearly distinguishable from the symptom profiles of ICD-10 somatoform disorders and ICD-10 sexual dysfunction. Discussion: Due to this substantial diagnostic overlap, the clinical validity of ICD-10 neurasthenia remains questionable.

Keywords:
Neurasthenia, Somatoform disorders, ICD-10
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.