Abstract
Introduction: Family caregivers of patients with dementia suffer a high burden of depression and reduced positive emotions. Mentalizing imagery therapy (MIT) provides mindfulness and guided imagery skills training to improve balanced mentalizing and emotion regulation. Objective: Our aims were to test the hypotheses that MIT for family caregivers would reduce depression symptoms and improve positive psychological traits more than a support group (SG), and would increase dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) connectivity and reduce subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) connectivity. Methods: Forty-six caregivers participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing a 4-week MIT group (n = 24) versus an SG (n = 22). Resting state neuroimaging was obtained at baseline and post-group in 28 caregivers, and questionnaires completed by all participants. The primary outcome was change in depression; secondary measures included anxiety, mindfulness, self-compassion, and well-being. Brain networks with participation of DLPFC and sgACC were identified. Connectivity strengths of DLPFC and sgACC with respective networks were determined with dual regression. DLPFC connectivity was correlated with mindfulness and depression outcomes. Results: MIT significantly outperformed SG in improving depression, anxiety, mindfulness, self-compassion, and well-being, with moderate to large effect sizes. Relative to SG, participants in MIT showed significant increases in DLPFC connectivity – exactly replicating pilot study results – but no change in sgACC. DLPFC connectivity change correlated positively with mindfulness and negatively with depression change. Conclusions: In this trial, MIT was superior to SG for reducing depression and anxiety symptoms and improving positive psychological traits. Neuroimaging results suggested that strengthening DLPFC connectivity with an emotion regulation network might be mechanistically related to MIT effects.
References
1.
Brodaty
H
, Donkin
M
. Clinical research: family caregivers of people with dementia
. Dialogues Clin Neurosci
. 2009
;11
(2
):217
–28
.2.
Schulz
R
, Sherwood
PR
. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving
. Am J Nurs
. 2008 Sep
;108
(9 Suppl
):23
–7
. .3.
Gaugler
JE
, Yu
F
, Krichbaum
K
, Wyman
JF
. Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia
. Med Care
. 2009
;47
(2
):191
–8
. .4.
Wuest
J
, Ericson
PK
, Stern
PN
. Becoming strangers: the changing family caregiving relationship in Alzheimer’s disease
. J Adv Nurs
. 1994 Sep
;20
(3
):437
–43
.5.
Allen
J
, Fonagy
P
. Mentalizing in psychotherapy
. The American psychiatric publishing textbook of psychiatry
. 6th ed. Washington
: American Psychiatric Publishing
; 2014
. p. 1095
–118
.6.
Jain
FA
, Fonagy
P
. Mentalizing imagery therapy: theory and case series of imagery and mindfulness techniques to understand self and others
. Mindfulness
. 2020 Jan
;11
(1
):153
–65
. .7.
Van Gordon
W
, Shonin
E
. Second-generation mindfulness-based interventions: toward more authentic mindfulness practice and teaching
. Mindfulness
. 2020 Jan
;11
(1
):1
–4
. .8.
Yang
FC
, Zamaria
J
, Morgan
S
, Lin
E
, Leuchter
AF
, Abrams
M
, How family dementia caregivers perceive benefits of a 4-week Mentalizing Imagery Therapy Program: a pilot study
. Prof Psychol Res Pract
. Forthcoming 2021
.9.
Jain
FA
, Chernyak
S
, Nickerson
L
, Abrams
M
, Iacoboni
M
, Christov-Moore
L
, Mentalizing imagery therapy for depressed family dementia caregivers: feasibility, clinical outcomes and brain connectivity changes
. J Affect Disord Reports
. 2021
;5
:100155
.10.
Dixon
ML
, Thiruchselvam
R
, Todd
R
, Christoff
K
. Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review
. Psychol Bull
. 2017 Oct
;143
(10
):1033
–81
. .11.
Greicius
MD
, Flores
BH
, Menon
V
, Glover
GH
, Solvason
HB
, Kenna
H
, Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus
. Biol Psychiatry
. 2007
;62
(5
):429
–37
.12.
Rush
AJ
, Trivedi
MH
, Ibrahim
HM
, Carmody
TJ
, Arnow
B
, Klein
DN
, The 16-Item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression
. Biol Psychiatry
. 2003 Sep
;54
(5
):573
–83
.13.
Hamilton
M
. A rating scale for depression
. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
. 1960
;23
:56
–62
. .14.
Morriss
R
, Leese
M
, Chatwin
J
, Baldwin
D
; THREAD Study Group
. Inter-rater reliability of the hamilton depression rating scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care
. J Affect Disord
. 2008 Dec
;111
(2–3
):204
–13
. .15.
Carrozzino
D
, Patierno
C
, Fava
GA
, Guidi
J
. The hamilton rating scales for depression: a critical review of clinimetric properties of different versions
. Psychother Psychosom
. 2020 Apr
;89
(3
):133
–50
. .16.
Bond
FW
, Hayes
SC
, Baer
RA
, Carpenter
KM
, Guenole
N
, Orcutt
HK
, Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance
. Behav Ther
. 2011
;42
(4
):676
–88
.17.
Baer
RA
, Smith
GT
, Lykins
E
, Button
D
, Krietemeyer
J
, Sauer
S
, Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples
. Assessment
. 2008
;15
(3
):329
–42
.18.
Keyes
CL
. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life
. J Health Soc Behav
. 2002 Jun
;43
(2
):207
. .19.
Watson
D
, Clark
LA
, Tellegen
A
. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales
. J Pers Soc Psychol
. 1988 Jun
;54
(6
):1063
–70
. .20.
Raes
F
, Pommier
E
, Neff
KD
, Van Gucht
D
. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale
. Clin Psychol Psychother
. 2011
;18
(3
):250
–5
. .21.
Spielberger
CD
, Gorsuch
RL
, Lushene
RE
. State-trait anxiety inventory
. Palo Alto
: Consulting Psychologists Press
; 1970
.22.
O’Rourke
N
, Tuokko
HA
. Psychometric properties of an abridged version of The Zarit Burden Interview within a representative Canadian caregiver sample
. Gerontologist
. 2003 Feb
;43
(1
):121
–7
.23.
Borkovec
TD
, Nau
SD
. Credibility of analogue therapy rationales
. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry
. 1972
;3
(4
):257
–60
. .24.
Carrozzino
D
, Patierno
C
, Guidi
J
, Berrocal Montiel
C
, Cao
J
, Charlson
ME
, Clinimetric criteria for patient-reported outcome measures
. Psychother Psychosom
. 2021
;90
(4
):222
–32
.25.
Esteban
O
, Markiewicz
CJ
, Blair
RW
, Moodie
CA
, Isik
AI
, Erramuzpe
A
, fMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI
. Nat Methods
. 2019 Jan
;16
(1
):111
–6
.26.
Beckmann
CF
, DeLuca
M
, Devlin
JT
, Smith
SM
. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis
. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
. 2005 May
;360
(1457
):1001
–13
. .27.
Pervaiz
U
, Vidaurre
D
, Woolrich
MW
, Smith
SM
. Optimising network modelling methods for fMRI
. Neuroimage
. 2020 May
;211
:116604
. .28.
Nickerson
LD
, Smith
SM
, Öngür
D
, Beckmann
CF
. Using dual regression to investigate network shape and amplitude in functional connectivity analyses
. Front Neurosci
. 2017 Mar
;11
:115
. .29.
R Core Team
. R: a language and environment for statistical computing
. Vienna
: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
; 2018
.30.
Fitzmaurice
G
, Laird
N
, Ware
J
. Applied longitudinal analysis
. 2nd ed. Hoboken
: John Wiley & Sons
; 2011
. p. 128
–9
.31.
Guidi
J
, Brakemeier
E-L
, Bockting
CL
, Cosci
F
, Cuijpers
P
, Jarrett
RB
, Methodological recommendations for trials of psychological interventions
. Psychother Psychosom
. 2018 Sep
;87
(5
):276
–84
.32.
Trivedi
MH
, Rush
AJ
, Ibrahim
HM
, Carmody
TJ
, Biggs
MM
, Suppes
T
, The inventory of depressive symptomatology, clinician rating (IDS-C) and self-report (IDS-SR), and the quick inventory depressive symptomatology, clinician rating (QIDS-C) and self-report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychome
. Psychol Med
. 2004
;34
(1
):73
–82
.33.
Rush
AJ
, South
C
, Jain
S
, Agha
R
, Zhang
M
, Shrestha
S
, Clinically significant changes in the 17- and 6-item hamilton rating scales for depression: a STAR*D Report
. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
. 2021
;17
:2333
–45
.34.
Raymond
M
, Rousset
F
. An exact test for population differentiation
. Evolution
. 1995
;49
(6
):1280
–3
. .35.
Kim
S
. ppcor: an R package for a fast calculation to semi-partial correlation coefficients
. Commun Stat Appl Methods
. 2015 Nov
;22
(6
):665
–74
. .36.
Kievit
RA
, Frankenhuis
WE
, Waldorp
LJ
, Borsboom
D
. Simpson’s paradox in psychological science: a practical guide
. Front Psychol
. 2013 Aug 12
;4
:513
.37.
Fonseka
TM
, MacQueen
GM
, Kennedy
SH
. Neuroimaging biomarkers as predictors of treatment outcome in Major Depressive Disorder
. J Affect Disord
. 2018 Jun
;233
:21
–35
. .38.
Liu
Z
, Chen
QL
, Sun
YY
. Mindfulness training for psychological stress in family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
. Clin Interv Aging
. 2017 Sep
;12
:1521
–9
. .39.
Fredrickson
BL
. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions
. Am Psychol
. 2001 Mar
;56
(3
):218
–26
. .40.
Holzel
BK
, Hoge
EA
, Greve
DN
, Gard
T
, Creswell
JD
, Brown
KW
, Neural mechanisms of symptom improvements in generalized anxiety disorder following mindfulness training
. Neuroimage Clin
. 2013
;2
:448
–58
.41.
King
AP
, Block
SR
, Sripada
RK
, Rauch
S
, Giardino
N
, Favorite
T
, Altered default mode network (DMN) resting state functional connectivity following a mindfulness-based exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in combat veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq
. Depress Anxiety
. 2016 Apr
;33
(4
):289
–99
.42.
Hamani
C
, Mayberg
H
, Stone
S
, Laxton
A
, Haber
S
, Lozano
AM
. The subcallosal cingulate gyrus in the context of major depression
. Biol Psychiatry
. 2011 Feb
;69
(4
):301
–8
. .© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
