Background: Since the cognitive revolution of the early 1950s, cognitions have been discussed as central components in the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses. Even though there is an extensive literature on the association between therapy-related cognitions such as irrational beliefs and psychological distress over the past 60 years, there is little meta-analytical knowledge about the nature of this association. Methods: The relationship between irrational beliefs and distress was examined based on a systematic review that included 100 independent samples, gathered in 83 primary studies, using a random-effect model. The overall effects as well as potential moderators were examined: (a) distress measure, (b) irrational belief measure, (c) irrational belief type, (d) method of assessment of distress, (e) nature of irrational beliefs, (f) time lag between irrational beliefs and distress assessment, (g) nature of stressful events, (h) sample characteristics (i.e. age, gender, income, and educational, marital, occupational and clinical status), (i) developer/validator status of the author(s), and (k) publication year and country. Results: Overall, irrational beliefs were positively associated with various types of distress, such as general distress, anxiety, depression, anger, and guilt (omnibus: r = 0.38). The following variables were significant moderators of the relationship between the intensity of irrational beliefs and the level of distress: irrational belief measure and type, stressful event, age, educational and clinical status, and developer/validator status of the author. Conclusions: Irrational beliefs and distress are moderately connected to each other; this relationship remains significant even after controlling for several potential covariates.

1.
World Health Organization (WHO): The Global Burden of Disease - 2004 Update. Geneva, WHO, 2008.
2.
Cratsley K, Samuels R: Cognitive science and explanations of psychopathology; in Fulford K, Davies M, Gipps R, et al (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry, ed 1. New York, Oxford University, 2015, pp 413-433.
3.
Chomsky N: Universals of human nature. Psychother Psychosom 2005;74:263-268.
4.
Ellis A: New approaches to psychotherapy techniques. J Clin Psychol 1955;11:207-260.
5.
Ellis A: Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. Oxford, Stuart, 1962.
6.
Ellis A, Bernard ME: What is rational-emotive therapy (RET); in Ellis A, Bernard ME (eds): Clinical Applications of Rational-Emotive Therapy. New York, Plenum, 1985, pp 1-30.
7.
Ellis A: Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy, revised. Secaucus, Birch Lane, 1994.
8.
Beck AT: Cognitive Therapy for Emotional Disorders. New York, International University, 1976.
9.
Lazarus RS: Emotion and Adaptation. New York, Oxford University, 1991.
10.
Vîslă A, grosse Holtforth M, David D: Descriptive/inferential cognitive processes and evaluative cognitive processes: relationships among each other and with emotional distress. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 2015;33:148-159.
11.
David D, Lynn SJ, Ellis A: Rational and Irrational Beliefs. Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice. New York, Oxford University, 2010.
12.
Haaga D, Davison G: An appraisal of rational-emotive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:215-220.
13.
Storch E, Roberti J, Roth D: Factor structure, concurrent validity, and internal consistency of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition in a sample of college students. Depress Anxiety 2004;19:187-189.
14.
Jones RG: A Factored Measure of Ellis' Irrational Belief Systems with Personality and Maladjustment Correlated. Wichita, Test Systems, 1968.
15.
Kassinove H: Self-reported affect and core irrational thinking: a preliminary analysis. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 1986;4:119-130.
16.
DiGiuseppe R, Leaf R, Exner T, Robin MW: The development of a measure of irrational/rational thinking. The World Congress of Behaviour Therapy, Edinburgh, 1988.
17.
Malouff J, Schutte N: Development and validation of a measure of irrational belief. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986;54:860-862.
18.
Terjesen M, Salhany J, Sciutto M: A psychometric review of measures of irrational beliefs: implications for psychotherapy. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 2009;27:83-96.
19.
David D, Schnur J, Belloiu A: Another search for the ‘hot' cognitions: appraisal, irrational beliefs, attributions, and their relation to emotion. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 2002;20:93-131.
20.
Szentagotai A, Freeman A: An analysis of the relationship between irrational beliefs and automatic thought in predicting distress. J Cogn Behav Psychother 2007;7:1-9.
21.
DiLorenzo T, David D, Montgomery GH: The impact of general and specific rational and irrational beliefs on exam distress: a further investigation of the binary model of distress as an emotional regulation model. J Cogn Behav Psychother 2011;11:121-142.
22.
Cramer D, Buckland N: Effect of rational and irrational statements and demand characteristics on task anxiety. J Psychol 1995;129:269-275.
23.
Szentagotai A, David D, Lupu V, Cosman D: Rational emotive behavior therapy versus cognitive therapy versus pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depressive disorder: mechanisms of change analysis. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2008;45:523-538.
24.
David D, Freeman A, DiGiuseppe R: Rational and irrational beliefs: implications for mechanism of change and practice in psychotherapy; in David D, Lynn SJ, Ellis A (eds): Rational and Irrational Beliefs: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice. New York, Oxford University, 2010, pp 195-217.
25.
Hayslip B Jr, Galt CP, Lopez FG, Nation PC: Irrational beliefs and depressive symptoms among younger and older adults: a cross-sectional comparison. Int J Aging Hum Dev 1994;38:307-326.
26.
Kassinove H, Eckhardt CI: Irrational beliefs and self-reported affect in Russia and America. Pers Individ Dif 1994;16:133-142.
27.
Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC: The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 2009.
28.
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL: Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, ed 2. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2004.
29.
Del Re AC, Hoyt WT: MAc: Meta-Analysis with Correlations 2010. R Package Version 1.0.5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package! Mac.
30.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988.
31.
Viechtbauer W: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010;36:1-48.
32.
Higgins J, Thompson S: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-1558.
33.
Begg C, Mazumdar M: Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101.
34.
Egger M, Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634.
35.
Duval S, Tweedie R: Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-463.
36.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK: Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, Psychological Corporation, 1996.
37.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists, 1983.
38.
McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF: Profile of Mood State. San Diego, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1971.
39.
Fava GA: Statistical alchemy for drug treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a commentary on the meta-analysis by Baldwin et al. [BMJ 2011; 342:d1199]. Psychother Psychosom 2011;80:261-263.
40.
Fava GA, Guidi J, Rafanelli C, Sonino N: The clinical inadequacy of evidence-based medicine and the need for a conceptual framework based on clinical judgment. Psychother Psychosom 2015;84:1-3.
41.
Zurawski R, Smith T: Assessing irrational beliefs and emotional distress: evidence and implications of limited discriminant validity. J Couns Psychol 1987;34:224-227.
42.
Harrington N: Frustration intolerance as a multidimensional concept. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther 2007;25:191-211.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.