Background: Some general hospitals within the German health system provide supportive interventions, psychological as well as spiritual, to their patients. It remains to be proven if these interventions are effective when used in routine clinical practice. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of psychological and spiritual interventions on improving recovery following bypass surgery. Methods: The BY.PASS study is a pragmatic, patient preference trial (ISRCTN 07297983). Adult patients scheduled for elective coronary bypass surgery were enrolled. Patients were assigned to study conditions according to their personal preference: preference for psychological interventions, for spiritual interventions or for no intervention. Patients who were open for any kind of intervention were randomly assigned either to psychological or spiritual interventions. During a control period, patients were asked about their preference, but did not receive any interventions. Primary outcomes of the study were in-hospital morbidity and early mortality. Psychological measures served as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 847 patients were enrolled. Patients of the control (n = 260) and the intervention group (n = 269) who explicitly wanted to have interventions were compared. No significant treatment effects either for morbidity (d = 0.08, 95% CI –0.09 to 0.25), or for mortality (OR = 1.81; 95% CI 0.50–6.57) could be found. A reduction of negative mood resulted from both interventions. Conclusions: Although the effects observed were small, the study can serve as a basis to discuss methodological as well as theoretical aspects of a pragmatic trial, based upon patients’ preferences.

Keywords:
Coronary artery bypass, Pragmatic trial, Patient preference, Psychological intervention, Spiritual intervention
1.
Salmon P: Psychological factors in surgical stress – implications for management. Clin Psychol Rev 1992;12:681–704.
2.
Ashton C Jr, Whitworth GC, Seldomridge JA, Shapiro PA, Weinberg AD, Michler RE, Smith CR, Rose EA, Fisher S, Oz MC: Self-hypnosis reduces anxiety following coronary artery bypass surgery. A prospective, randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1997;38:69–75.
3.
Ashton RC Jr, Whitworth GC, Seldomridge JA, Shapiro PA, Michler RE, Smith CR, Rose EA, Fisher S, Oz MC: The effects of self-hypnosis on quality of life following coronary artery bypass surgery: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Altern Complement Med 1995;1:285–290.
4.
Bergmann P, Huber S, Machler H, Liebl E, Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Rehak P, Rigler B: The influence of medical information on the perioperative course of stress in cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1093–1099.
5.
Herdy AH, Marcchi PL, Vila A, Tavares C, Collaco J, Niebauer J, Ribeiro JP: Pre- and postoperative cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in hospitalized patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:714–719.
6.
Ku SL, Ku CH, Ma FC: Effects of phase I cardiac rehabilitation on anxiety of patients hospitalized for coronary artery bypass graft in Taiwan. Heart Lung 2002;31:133–140.
7.
Pignay-Demaria V, Lesperance F, Demaria RG, Frasure-Smith N, Perrault LP: Depression and anxiety and outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:314–321.
8.
Imel Z, Wampold B: The importance of treatment and the science of common factors in psychotherapy; in Brown S, Lent R (eds): Handbook of Counseling Psychology. New York, Wiley, 2008, pp 249–262.
9.
Ahn HN, Wampold BE: Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. J Couns Psychol 2001;48:251–257.
10.
Lambert MJ, Ogles BM: The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy; in Lambert MJ (ed): Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York, Wiley, 2004, pp 139–193.
11.
Crits-Christoph P: Limitations of the dodo bird verdict and the role of clinical trials in psychotherapy research: comment on Wampold et al. (1997). Psychol Bull 1997;122:216–220.
12.
Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, Altman DG, Tunis S, Haynes B, Oxman AD, Moher D: Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the consort statement. BMJ 2008;337:A2390.
13.
Rosendahl J, Tigges-Limmer K, Gummert J, Dziewas R, Albes JM, Strauss B: Bypass surgery with psychological and spiritual support (the BY.PASS study): study design and research methods. Am Heart J 2009;158:8–14 e11.
14.
Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM: Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: Demonstration of potential impact using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:286–298.
15.
Herrmann C: International experiences with the hospital anxiety and depression scale – a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1997;42:17–41.
16.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361–370.
17.
Abele A, Brehm W: Mood effects of exercise versus sport games: findings and implications for well-being and health. Int Rev Health Psychol 1993;2:53–80.
18.
Attkisson CC, Zwick R: The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982;5:233–237.
19.
Alexander LB, Luborsky L: The Penn Helping Alliance Scales; in Greenberg LS, Pinsof W (eds): In the Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook. New York, Guilford Press, 1986, pp 325–366.
20.
Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R: European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9–13.
21.
Brooks D, Parsons J, Tran D, Jeng B, Gorczyca B, Newton J, Lo V, Dear C, Silaj E, Hawn T: The two-minute walk test as a measure of functional capacity in cardiac surgery patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1525–1530.
22.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
23.
Rubin DB: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, Wiley, 1987.
24.
Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD: How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci 2007;8:206–213.
25.
Schafer JL, Graham JW: Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002;7:147–177.
26.
Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM: A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods 2001;6:330–351.
27.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55.
28.
Hedges LV, Cooper HM, Valentine J (eds): The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, ed 2. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
29.
Austin PC: A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 2008;27:2037–2049.
30.
Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D: The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:69–77.
31.
King M, Nazareth I, Lampe F, Bower P, Chandler M, Morou M, Sibbald B, Lai R: Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1089–1099.
32.
Mergl R, Henkel V, Allgaier AK, Kramer D, Hautzinger M, Kohnen R, Coyne J, Hegerl U: Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients’ choice arm. Psychother Psychosom 2011;80:39–47.
33.
Swift JK, Callahan JL: The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 2009;65:368–381.
34.
Norcross JC (ed): Psychotherapy Relationships That Work, ed 2. New York, Oxford University Press, 2011.
35.
Nuesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Rutjes AW, Burgi E, Scherer M, Altman DG, Juni P: The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2009;339:b3244.
36.
Porta N, Bonet C, Cobo E: Discordance between reported intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:663–669.
37.
Tierney JF, Stewart LA: Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:79–87.
38.
Rees K, Bennett P, West R, Davey SG, Ebrahim S: Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD002902.
39.
Benson H, Dusek JA, Sherwood JB, Lam P, Bethea CF, Carpenter W, Levitsky S, Hill PC, Clem DW, Jain MK, Drumel D, Kopecky SL, Mueller PS, Marek D, Rollins S, Hibberd PL: Study of the therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer (step) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer. Am Heart J 2006;151:934–942.
40.
Ai AL, Ladd KL, Peterson C, Cook CA, Shearer M, Koenig HG: Long-term adjustment after surviving open heart surgery: the effect of using prayer for coping replicated in a prospective design. Gerontologist 2010;50:798–809.
41.
Ano GG, Vasconcelles EB: Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol 2005;61:461–480.
42.
Chida Y, Steptoe A, Powell LH: Religiosity/spirituality and mortality. A systematic quantitative review. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:81–90.
43.
Baron G, Ravaud P, Samson A, Giraudeau B: Missing data in randomized controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis with radiographic outcomes: a simulation study. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:25–31.
44.
Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, Hirsh J, Rush B: Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:253–262.
45.
Shuldham CM, Fleming S, Goodman H: The impact of pre-operative education on recovery following coronary artery bypass surgery. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Heart J 2002;23:666–674.
46.
Sorlie T, Busund R, Sexton J, Sexton H, Sorlie D: Video information combined with individualized information sessions: Effects upon emotional well-being following coronary artery bypass surgery – a randomized trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007;65:180–188.
47.
Burg MM, Rieckmann N, Clemow L, Medina V, Schwartz J, Davidson KW: Treatment preferences among depressed patients after acute coronary syndrome: the COPES observational cohort. Psychother Psychosom 2011;80:380–382.
48.
Küchler T, Berend M: Psychotherapie in der Chirurgie; in Faller H (ed): Psychotherapie bei Somatischen Erkrankungen. Stuttgart, Thieme, 2004, pp 117–127.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.