Background: The impact of chronic illnesses is not only influenced by one’s physical functioning but also by its subjective importance to the individual’s life. However, it is often difficult to asses such an impact in an appropriate way. PRISM (pictorial representation of illness and self measure) measures the perception of illness and first data on its validity have been published. The aim of the present study was to prove the applicability of PRISM regarding alcohol-dependent patients. Therefore, a comparison was made between alcohol-dependent patients, alcohol abusers and at-risk drinkers. Method: The sample consisted of 763 general practice patients, who scored above the cutoff in alcohol-related screening questionnaires. Of this sample, 330 were diagnosed as alcohol dependent, alcohol abusers (both according to DSM-IV) or at-risk drinkers. To prove the applicability, PRISM was put in context with the severity of alcohol dependence and the core constructs of the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Results: PRISM was related to the severity of the drinking problem: the severer the drinking problem, the shorter the distance between self and illness. High correlations with aspects of alcohol consumption – such as adverse consequences from drinking, temptation to drink, and self-efficacy to abstain – were found. Concerning stages of change according to the transtheoretical model of behavior change, data show a significant difference in the self-illness separation between patients in the stage of contemplation compared to those in the precontemplation or action stage. Conclusions: The PRISM task is applicable to patients with alcohol use disorders. Within this group and in contrast to other chronic diseases, PRISM reveals a significant relationship not only to the severity of drinking, but also to the readiness to change one’s drinking behavior.

1.
Büchi S, Sensky T, Sharpe L, Timberlake N: Graphic representation of illness: a novel method of measuring patients’ perceptions of the impact of illness. Psychother Psychosom 1998;67:222–225.
2.
Cassell EJ: The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. N Engl J Med 1982;306:639–645.
3.
Büchi S, Sensky T: PRISM: Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure. A brief nonverbal measure of illness impact and therapeutic aid in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics 1999;40:314–320.
4.
Rumpf HJ, Lontz W, Uesseler S: A self-administered version of a brief measure of suffering: first aspects of validity. Psychother Psychosom 2004;73:53–56.
5.
Büchi S, Buddeberg C, Klaghofer R, Russi EW, Brandli O, Schlosser C, Stoll T, Villiger PM, Sensky T: Preliminary validation of PRISM (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure) – A brief method to assess suffering. Psychother Psychosom 2002;71:333–341.
6.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrated model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51:390–395.
7.
Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC: The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Homewood, Dow Jones Irwin, 1984.
8.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–483.
9.
Allen JP, Litten RZ, Fertig JB, Babor T: A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997;21:613–619.
10.
Rumpf H-J, Hapke U, Hill A, John U: Development of a screening questionnaire for the general hospital and general practices. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997;21:894–898.
11.
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG: AUDIT – The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001.
12.
Rumpf H-J, Hapke U, Meyer C, John U: Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the general population: psychometric performance of three questionnaires. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37:261–268.
13.
Rumpf H-J, Hapke U, John U: Der Lübecker Alkoholabhängigkeits- und -missbrauchs-Screening-Test (LAST). Testmanual. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 2001.
14.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4, international version. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1995.
15.
Wittchen H-U, Beloch E, Garczynski E, Holly A, Lachner G, Perkonigg A, Vodermaier A, Vossen A, Wunderlich U, Zieglgänsberger S: Münchener Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI), Version 2.2. München, Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, 1995.
16.
Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiological instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:1069–1077.
17.
Andrews G, Peters L: The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998;33:80–88.
18.
Lachner G, Wittchen H-U, Perkonigg A, Holly A, Schuster P, Wunderlich U, Türk D, Garczynski E, Pfister H: Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) substance use sections. Eur Addict Res 1988;4:28–41.
19.
Babor TF, Grant M: Program on Substance Abuse. Project on Identification and Management of Alcohol-Related Problems. Report on Phase II: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Brief Interventions in Primary Health Care. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992.
20.
John U, Hapke U, Rumpf H-J: A new measure of the alcohol dependence syndrome: the severity scale of alcohol dependence. Eur Addict Res 2003;9:87–93.
21.
Moos RH, Cronkite RC, Billings AG, Finney JW: Health and Daily Living Form Manual. Palo Alto, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Veterans Administration and Stanford University Medical Centers, 1985.
22.
Finney W, Moos R: Entering treatment for alcohol abuse: a stress and coping model. Addiction 1995;90:1223–1240.
23.
Heather N, Rollnick S, Bell A: Predictive validity of the readiness to change questionnaire. Addiction 1993;88:1667–1677.
24.
Hannöver W, Rumpf H-J, Meyer C, Hapke U, John U: Der Fragebogen zur Änderungsbereitschaft bei Alkoholkonsum: deutsche Version (RCQ-D); in Glöckner-Rist A, Rist F, Küfner H (eds): Elektronisches Handbuch zu Erhebungsinstrumenten im Suchtbereich (EHES) Version: 3.00. Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, 2003. Available online: www.psy.uni-muenster.de/institut1/ehes/startseite.htm.
25.
Hannöver W, Thyrian JR, Hapke U, Rumpf H-J, Meyer C, John U: The Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ) in subjects with hazardous alcohol consumption, alcohol misuse and dependence in a general population survey. Alcohol Alcohol 2002;37:362–369.
26.
Rollnick S, Heather N, Gold R, Hall W: Development of a short ‘readiness to change’ questionnaire for use in brief, opportunistic interventions among excessive drinkers. Br J Addict 1992;87:743–754.
27.
DiClemente CC, Carbonari JP, Addy RC, Velasquez MM: Alternate short forms of a Processes of Change Scale for alcoholism treatment. 4th Int Congr Behav Med, Washington, 1996.
28.
Freyer J, Schumann A, Rumpf H-J, Meyer C, Hapke U, John U: Processes of Change Scala für Alkoholkonsum: deutsche Version (POC-A-G); in Glöckner-Rist A, Rist F, Küfner H (eds): Elektronisches Handbuch zu Erhebungsinstrumenten im Suchtbereich (EHES) Version:3.00. Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, 2003. Available online: www.psy.uni-muenster.de/institut1/ehes/startseite.htm.
29.
King TK, DiClemente CC: A decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting drinking behavior. Advances in Addictive Behaviors Therapy, AABT poster presentation, University of Houston, 1993.
30.
Hannöver W, Rumpf H-J, Meyer C, Hapke U, John U: Die Skala zur Entscheidungsbalance bei Alkoholkonsum (ADBS-D); in Glöckner-Rist A, Rist F, Küfner H (eds): Elektronisches Handbuch zu Erhebungsinstrumenten im Suchtbereich (EHES) Version: 1.00. Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, 2001. Available online: www.psy.uni-muenster.de/institut1/ehes/startseite.htm.
31.
DiClemente CC, Carbonari JP, Montgomery RPG, Hughes SO: The Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale. J Stud Alcohol 1994;55:141–148.
32.
Bott KE, Rumpf HJ, Bischof G, Meyer C, Hannöver W, Hapke U, John U: Der Alkoholabstinenz-Selbstwirksamkeitsfragebogen: deutsche Version (AASE-G); in Glöckner-Rist A, Rist F, Küfner H (eds): Elektronisches Handbuch zu Erhebungsinstrumenten im Suchtbereich (EHES) Version: 3.00. Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, 2003. Available online: www.psy.uni-muenster.de/institut1/ehes/startseite.htm.
33.
Denton F, Sharpe L, Schrieber L: PRISM: Enmeshment of illness and self-schema. Psychother Psychosom 2004;73:57–63.
34.
Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing. Preparing People for Change. New York, Guilford, 2002.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.