Background: Increasingly, researchers attend to both positive and negative aspects of mental health. Such distinctions call for clarification of whether psychological well-being and ill-being comprise opposite ends of a bipolar continuum, or are best construed as separate, independent dimensions of mental health. Biology can help resolve this query – bipolarity predicts ‘mirrored’ biological correlates (i.e. well-being and ill-being correlate similarly with biomarkers, but show opposite directional signs), whereas independence predicts ‘distinct’ biological correlates (i.e. well-being and ill-being have different biological signatures). Methods: Multiple aspects of psychological well-being (eudaimonic, hedonic) and ill-being (depression, anxiety, anger) were assessed in a sample of aging women (n = 135, mean age = 74) on whom diverse neuroendocrine (salivary cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, DHEA-S) and cardiovascular factors (weight, waist-hip ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, total/HDL cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin) were also measured. Results: Measures of psychological well-being and ill-being were significantly linked with numerous biomarkers, with some associations being more strongly evident for respondents aged 75+. Outcomes for seven biomarkers supported the distinct hypothesis, while findings for only two biomarkers supported the mirrored hypothesis. Conclusion: This research adds to the growing literature on how psychological well-being and mental maladjustment are instantiated in biology. Population-based inquiries and challenge studies constitute important future directions.

Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL: Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999;125:276–302.
Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N: Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.
Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD: Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002;82:1007–1022.
Ryan RM, Deci EL: On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Ann Rev Psychol 2001;52:141–166.
Bradburn NM: The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago, Aldine, 1969.
Diener E, Smith H, Fujita F: The personality structure of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;69:130–141.
Russell JA, Carroll JM: On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull 1999;125:3–30.
Yik MSM, Russell JA, Barrett LF: Structure of self-reported current affect: integration and beyond. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;77:600–619.
Keyes CLM: The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav 2002;43:207–222.
Singer BH, Ryff CD, Carr D, Magee WJ: Life histories and mental health: A person-centered strategy; in Raftery A (ed): Sociological Methodology. Washington, American Sociological Association, 1998, pp 1–51.
Davidson RJ: Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cogn Emotion 1998;12:307–330.
Urry HL, Nitschke JB, Dolski I, Jackson DC, Dalton KM, Mueller CJ, Rosenkranz MA, Ryff CD, Singer BH, Davison RJ: Making a life worth living: neural correlates of well-being. Psychol Sci 2004;15:367–372.
Fava GA, Rafanelli C, Grandi S, Conti S, Belluardo P: Prevention of recurrent depression with cognitive behavioral therapy. Arch Gen Psychiat 1998;55:816–821.
Fava GA, Ruini C, Rafanelli C, Finos L, Conti S, Grandi S: Six-year outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for prevention of recurrent depression. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:1872–1876.
Ryff CD, Singer BH: The contours of positive human health. Psychol Inq 1998;9:1–28.
Ryff CD, Singer BH: Social environments and the genetics of aging: advancing knowledge of protective health mechanisms. J Gerontol Ser B 2005;60:12–23.
Brown ES, Varghese FP, McEwen BS: Association of depression with medical illness: Does cortisol play a role? Biol Psychiatry 2004;55:1–9.
Hughes JW, Watkins L, Blumenthal JA: Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to increased 24-hour urinary norepinephrine excretion among healthy middle-aged women. J Psychosom Res 2004;57:353–358.
Polk DE, Cohen S, Doyle WJ: State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005;30:261–272.
Rubin RT, Poland RE, Lesser IM: Neuroendocrine aspects of primary endogenous depression. I. Cortisol secretory dynamics in patients and matched controls. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:328–336.
Barefoot JC, Heitmann BL, Helms MJ, Williams RB, Surwit RS, Siegler IC: Symptoms of depression and changes in body weight from adolescence to mid-life. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998;22:688–694.
Ahlberg AC, Ljung T, Rosmond R: Depression and anxiety symptoms in relation to anthropometry and metabolism in men. Psychiatr Res 2002;112:101–110.
Landén M, Baghaei F, Rosmond R: Dyslipidemia and high waist-hip ratio in women with self-reported social anxiety. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004;29:1037–1046.
Schuck P: Glycated hemoglobin as a physiological measure of stress and its relation to some psychological stress indicators. Behav Med 1998;24:89–94.
Markovitz JH, Matthews KA, Wing RR, Kuller LH, Meilahn EN: Psychological, biological and health behavior predictors of blood pressure changes in middle-age women. J Hypertens 1991;9:399–406.
Räikkönen R, Matthews KA, Kuller LH, Reiber C, Burher CH: Anger, hostility and visceral adipose tissue in healthy post-menopausal women. Metabolism 1999;489:1146–1151.
Steptoe A, Cropley M, Griffith J, Kirschbaum C: Job strain and anger expression predict early morning elevations in salivary cortisol. Psychosom Med 2000;62:286–292.
Lindfors P, Lundberg U: Is low cortisol release an indicator of positive health? Stress Health 2002;18:153–160.
Ryff CD, Singer BH, Love GD: Positive health: connecting well-being with biology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004;359:1383–1394.
Friedman EM, Hayney M, Love GD, Singer BH, Ryff CD: Serum interleukin-6 and soluble IL-6 receptors are modulated by psychological well-being in aging women. Meet Am Psychosom Soc, Vancouver, March, 2005.
Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK: The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull 1996;119:488–531.
Taylor SE, Lerner JS, Sherman DK, Sage RM, McDowell NK: Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles? J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;85:605–615.
Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM: The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;75:1333–1349.
Ryff CD, Singer BH: From social structure to biology: integrative science in pursuit of human health and well-being; in Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (eds): Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp 541–555.
Ryff CD: Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;57:1069–1081.
Ryff CD, Keyes CLM: The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;69:719–727.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:1063–1070.
Watson D, Clark LA, Weber K, Assenheimer JS, Strauss ME, McCormick RA: Testing a tripartite model. II. Exploring the symptom structure of anxiety and depression in student, adult, and patient samples. J Abnorm Psychol 1995;104:15–25.
Radloff L: The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385–401.
Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
Dixon WJ, Tukey JW: Approximate behavior of the distribution of Winsorized t (Trimming/Winsorization 2). Technometrics 1968;10:83–98.
Meng XL, Rosenthal R, Rubin DB: Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychol Bull 1992;111:172–175.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc B 1995;57:289–300.
Jorm A: Association of hypotension with positive and negative affect and depressive symptoms. Br J Psychiatry 2001;178:553–555.
James W: The varieties of religious experience. New York, New American Library, 1902.
Seeman TE, Singer B, Charpentier P: Gender differences in HPA axis response to challenge: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1995;20:711–725.
Seeman TE, Berkman LF, Gulanski B, Robbins R, Greenspan S, Rowe J: Response to challenge as a mechanism of successful aging: self-esteem as a predictor of neuroendocrine response. Psychosom Res 1995;39:69–84.
Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC, Atkinson C, Malarkey WB, Glaser R: Chronic stress and age-related increases in the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2003;100:9090–9095.
Marks NF: Does it hurt to care? Caregiving, work-family conflict, and midlife well-being. J Marriage Fam 1998;60:951–966.
Heffner KL, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Loving TJ, Glaser R, Malarkey WB: Spousal support satisfaction as a modifier of physiological responses to marital conflict in younger and older couples. J Behav Med 2004;27:233–254.
Charney DS: Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:195–216.
Ryff CD, Singer BH: Flourishing under fire: resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving; in Keyes CLM, Haidt J (eds): Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-Lived. Washington, American Psychological Association, 2003, pp 15–36.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.