Background: Cancer has an enormous impact on the patient, triggering fears of suffering, disability and death. Still, little research has been published which investigates the coping strategies adopted by cancer patients, when attempting to deal with their serious health threat. Moreover, it is often not clarified whether the selected coping strategies are used exclusively by cancer patients, or whether other groups of women facing benign breast diseases or having health worries regarding their breasts share similar coping strategies. This study attempts to identify those coping strategies that distinguish breast cancer patients from non-malignant controls. Methods: A sample of 180 breast cancer patients was assessed on how it coped with health threats. The control group was composed of 268 women who were diagnosed as having either a benign disease or were disease free. The Ways of Coping Questionnaire was administered in order to record the frequency of the coping strategies used under the health conditions. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare mean scores in coping strategies among the diagnostic groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify those variables that distinguish one group from the other. Results: Compared with women with benign breast disease and those who were disease free, breast cancer patients significantly infrequently exhibited attributions of blame to self, whereas they did not differ from controls in other ways of coping such as self-isolation, passive acceptance, seeking social support, problem-focused coping, positive reappraisal, distancing, and wishful thinking. Conclusion: Our results may suggest that under the conditions of a cancer diagnosis, patients do not tend to assign responsibility on themselves and their character, since they possibly need to avoid guilt, low self-esteem, and social distance, and to maintain a potential to invest in the adjustment process.

Keywords:
Coping, Breast cancer, Breast diseases, Self-blame
1.
Meyerowitz BE: Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments. Psychol Bull 1980;87:108–131.
2.
Rowland JH: Intrapersonal resources: Coping; in Holland JC, Rowland JH (eds): Handbook of Psychooncology: Psychological Care of the Patient with Cancer. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp 44–57.
3.
Ali NS, Khalil HZ: Identification of stressors, level of stress, coping strategies, and coping effectiveness among Egyptian mastectomy patients. Cancer Nurs 1991;14:232–239.
4.
Dunkel-Schetter C, Feinstein LG, Taylor SE, Falke RL: Patterns of coping with cancer. Health Psychol 1992;11:79–87.
5.
Jarrett SR, Ramirez AJ, Richards MA, Weinman J: Measuring coping in breast cancer. J Psychosom Res 1992;36:593–602.
6.
Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, Noriega V, Scheier MF, Robinson DS, Ketcham AS, Moffat FL, Clark KK: How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:375–390.
7.
Thomas SF, Marks DF: The measurement of coping in breast cancer patients. Psychooncology 1995;4:231–237.
8.
Heim E, Augustiny KF, Blaser A, Bürki C, Kühne D, Rothenbühler M, Schaffner L, Valach L: Coping with breast cancer – A longitudinal prospective study. Psychother Psychosom 1987;48:44–59.
9.
Cooper CL, Faragher EB: Coping strategies and breast disorders/cancer. Psychol Med 1992;22:447–455.
10.
Stanton AL, Snider PR: Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: A prospective study. Health Psychol 1993;12:16–23.
11.
Andrykowski MA, Curran SL, Studts JL, Cunningham L, Carpenter JS, McGrath PC, Sloan DA, Kenady DE: Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women with breast cancer and benign breast problems: A controlled comparison. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:827–834.
12.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, Springer, 1984.
13.
Lazarus RS: From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol 1993;44:1–21.
14.
Sheridan CL, Radmacher SA: Health Psychology: Challenging the Biomedical Model. New York, Wiley, 1992.
15.
US Department of Health and Human Services: The Breast Cancer Digest: A Guide to Medical Care, Emotional Support, Educational Programs, and Resources. Bethesda, NIH, Public Health Service, 1982.
16.
Epping-Jordan JE, Compas BE, Osowiecki DM, Oppedisano G, Gerhardt C, Primo K, Krag DN: Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: Processes of emotional distress. Health Psychol 1999;18:315–326.
17.
Osowiecki D, Compas BE: Psychological adjustment to cancer: Control beliefs and coping in adult cancer patients. Cognit Ther Res 1998;22:483–499.
18.
McCaul KD, Sandgren AK, King B, O’Donnell S, Branstetter A, Foreman G: Coping and adjustment to breast cancer. Psychooncology 1999;8:230–236.
19.
Ben-Zur H, Gilbar O, Lev S: Coping with breast cancer: Patient, spouse, and dyad models. Psychosom Med 2001;63:32–39.
20.
Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Huggins ME: The first year after breast cancer diagnosis: Hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment. Psychooncology 2002;11:93–102.
21.
Stanton AL, Danoff-Burg S, Cameron CL, Bishop M, Collins CA, Kirk SB, Sworowski LA: Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:875–882.
22.
Malcarne VL, Compas BE, Epping-Jordan JE, Howell DC: Cognitive factors in adjustment to cancer: Attributions of self-blame and perceptions of control. J Behav Med 1995;18:401–417.
23.
Lowery BJ, Jacobsen BS, DuCette J: Causal attribution, control, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 1993;10:37–53.
24.
Glinder JG, Compas BE: Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: A prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychol 1999;18:475–481.
25.
Posner JB: Neurological complications of systemic cancer. Med Clin North Am 1979;63:783–800.
26.
Gilbar O, Florian V: Do women with inoperable breast cancer have a psychological profile? Omega 1991;23:217–226.
27.
Boyle P: Epidemiology of breast cancer. Baillieres Clin Oncol 1988;2:1–57.
28.
Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ: Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;50:992–1003.
29.
Norusis MJ: SPSS User’s Guide. Chicago, SPSS, 1986.
30.
Heim E, Valach L, Schaffner L: Coping and psychosocial adaptation: Longitudinal effects over time and stages in breast cancer. Psychosom Med 1997;59:408–418.
31.
Wonghongkul T, Moore SM, Musil C, Schneider S, Deimling G: The influence of uncertainty in illness, stress appraisal, and hope on coping in survivors of breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 2000;23:422–429.
32.
Massie MJ, Holland JC: Overview of normal reactions and prevalence of psychiatric disorders; in Holland JC, Rowland JH (eds): Handbook of Psychooncology: Psychological Care of the Patient with Cancer. New York, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp 273–282.
33.
Irvine D, Brown B, Crooks D, Roberts J, Browne G: Psychosocial adjustment in women with breast cancer. Cancer 1991;67:1097–1117.
34.
Psychological Aspects of Breast Cancer Study Group: Psychological response to mastectomy: A prospective comparison study. Cancer 1987;59:189–196.
35.
Van’t Spijker A, Trijsburg RW, Duivenvoorden HJ: Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: A meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med 1997;59:280–293.
36.
Dorval M, Maunsell E, Deschenes L, Brisson J, Masse B: Long-term quality of life after breast cancer: Comparison of 8-year survivors with population controls. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:487–494.
37.
Grassi L, Rosti G: Psychiatric and psychosocial concomitants of abnormal illness behaviour in patients with cancer. Psychother Psychosom 1996;65:246–252.
38.
Folkman S, Lazarus RS: If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;48:150–170.
39.
Valentiner DP, Holahan CJ, Moos RH: Social support, appraisals of event controllability, and coping: An integrative model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;66:1094–1102.
40.
Burger JM: Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;56:246–256.
41.
Tomich PL, Helgeson VS: Five years later: A cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women. Psychooncology 2002;11:154–169.
42.
Taylor SE: Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. Am Psychol 1983;38:1161–1173.
43.
Stewart DE, Cheung AM, Duff S, Wong F, McQuestion M, Cheng T, Purdy L, Bunston T: Attributions of cause and recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2001;10:179–183.
44.
Butow PN, Coates AS, Dunn SM: Psychosocial predictors of survival: Metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2000;11:469–474.
45.
Crandall CS, Moriarty D: Physical illness stigma and social rejection. Br J Soc Psychol 1995;34:67–83.
46.
Weiner B: On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. Am Psychol 1993;48:957–965.
47.
Janoff-Bulman R, Timko C, Carli LL: Cognitive biases in blaming the victim. J Exp Soc Psychol 1985;21:161–177.
48.
Reynolds P, Hurley S, Torres M, Jackson J, Boyd P, Chen VW, and the Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group: Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: Results from the Black/White cancer survival study. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:940–949.
49.
Clipp EC, Hollis DR, Cohen HJ: Considerations of psychosocial illness phase in cancer survival. Psychooncology 2001;10:166–178.
50.
Lavery JF, Clarke VA: Causal attributions, coping strategies, and adjustment to breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 1996;19:20–28.
51.
Lederberg MS, Fitchett G: Can you measure a sunbeam with a ruler? Psychooncology 1999;8:375–377.
52.
Scott J: Cancer patients; in Scott J, Williams JMG, Beck AT (eds): Cognitive Therapy Clinical Practice: An Illustrative Casebook. London, Routledge, 1989, pp 103–126.
53.
Fawzy FI, Cousins N, Fawzy NW, Kemeny ME, Elashoff R, Morton D: A structured psychiatric intervention for cancer patients: Changes over time in methods of coping and affective disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:720–725.
54.
Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ: Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: Overview and recommendations for future research. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:558–584.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.