Background: Somatic illness and its consequences evoke strong emotions of various kinds. They may affect the course of illness and the treatment results through their physiological components. The purpose of the study was to explore emotional reactions to different kinds of illnesses and changes of these emotions over time. Methods: Subjects were 259 medical patients suffering from: primary hypertension, myocardial infarction and cancer of the lungs or pharynx. The study was longitudinal and consisted of three phases. The first was performed immediately after the patient was diagnosed, the second was done 5 weeks later and the third about half a year after the onset of illness. The patients’ emotional state was evaluated with the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales: the Anxiety and the Hope Scales. Results: Significant effects of the kind of illness and of its interaction with the phase of the study were found. In the hypertension group, both anxiety and hope were slightly elevated immediately after diagnosis, then slightly lowered. The myocardial infarction group exhibited a low level of these emotions in the first phase, an increase in the second and then a little decrease. Cancer patients manifested high anxiety and relatively low hope in the initial phase, then a decrease in anxiety and an increase in hope. Conclusions: Both anxiety and hope accompany the illness in its consecutive phases, reflecting properties of illness as a source of psychological stress and the coping process.

Maes S, Leventhal H, de Ridder DTD: Coping with chronic diseases; in Zeidner M, Endler NS (eds): Handbook of Coping. Theory, Research, Applications. New York, Wiley, 1996, pp 221–251.
Viney LL, Westbrook MT: Psychological reactions to chronic illness-related disability as a function of its severity and type. J Psychosom Res 1981;25:513–523.
Viney LL, Westbrook MT: Patterns of anxiety in the chronically ill. Br J Med Psychol 1982;55:87–95.
Gottschalk LA, Hoigaard-Martin J: The emotional impact of mastectomy. Psychiatry Res 1986;17:153–167.
Viney LL, Westbrook MT: Psychological states in patients with diabetes mellitus; in Gottschalk LA, Lolas F, Viney LL (eds): Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Significance in Clinical Medicine and Psychiatry. Heidelberg, Springer, 1986, pp 157–169.
Gottschalk LA: A hope scale applicable to verbal samples. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1974;30:779–785.
Averill JR: Intellectual emotion; in Spielberger CD, Sarason IG, Kulcsar Z, Van Heck GL (eds): Stress and Emotions: Anxiety, Anger and Curiosity. Washington, Hemisphere, 1991, vol 14, pp 3–16.
Perley J, Winget C, Placci C: Hope and discomfort as factors influencing treatment continuance. Compr Psychiatry 1971;12:557–563.
Taylor SE: Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. Amer Psychol 1983;38:1161–1173.
Hamera EK, Shontz FC: Perceived positive and negative effects of life-threatening illness. J Psychosom Res 1978;22:419–424.
Klenow DJ: Emotion and life-threatening illness: A typology of hope sources. Omega 1991–92;24:49–60.
Westbrook MT, Viney LL: Psychological reactions to the onset of chronic illness. Soc Sci Med 1982;16:899–905.
Deter HC, Klepper A, Schulte KH: Preliminary results of a differentiated emotion-stimulating interview in patients with essential hypertension as compared with inpatients of a psychosomatic unit and normal controls. Psychother Psychosom 1996;65:262–271.
Friedman EH: Neurobiology of anger-hostility and coronary risk. Psychother Psychosom 1996;65:222.
Tsouna HED, Mitsibounas DN, Kallergis GE, Sideris DA: Autonomic nervous system responses to personal stressful events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Preliminary results. Psychother Psychosom 1998;67:31–36.
Giraldi T, Rodani MG, Cartei G, Grassi L: Psychosocial factors and breast cancer: A 6-year Italian follow-up study. Psychother Psychosom 1997;66:229–236.
Pagotto U, Fallo F, Fava GA, Boscaro M, et al.: Anxiety sensitivity in essential hypertension. Stress Med 1992;8:113–115.
Chaudhury S, Singh, M, Bhardwaj P: Anxiety and expression in idiopathic hypertension. Indian J Clin Psychol 1994;21:18–21.
Pleszewski Z: Emotional functioning of patients before and after myocardial infarction. Poznań, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu im Adama Mickiewicza, 1977.
Wrześniewski K: Psychological problems of cardiac infarction patients. Warszawa, Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich, 1986.
Sarantidis D, Thomas A, Iphantis K, Katsaros N, Tripodianakis J, Katsabouris G: Level of anxiety, depression and denial in patients with myocardial infarction. Eur Psychiatry 1997;12:149–151.
Wirsching M: Krebs im Kontext. Gdańsk, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, 1994.
Van’t Spijker A, Trijsburg RW, Duivenvoorden HJ: Psychological sequelae of cancer diagnosis: A meta-analytical review of 58 studies after 1980. Psychosom Med 1997;59:280–293.
Heim E: Coping and adaptation in cancer; in Cooper CL, Watson M (eds): Cancer and Stress: Psychological, Biological and Coping Studies. New York, Wiley, 1991, pp 197–235.
Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D: The common sense representation of illness danger; in Rachman S (ed): Contribution to Medical Psychology. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1980, vol 2, pp 7–30.
Weinman J, Petrie KJ: Illness perception: A new paradigm for psychosomatics (editorial). J Psychosom Res 1997;42:113–116.
Shontz FC: Psychological Aspects of Physical Illness and Disability. New York, Macmillan, 1975.
Gottschalk LA, Gleser GC: The Measurement of Psychological States through the Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1969.
Wallbott HG, Scherer KW: Assessing emotion by questionnaire; in Plutchik R, Kellerman H (eds): Emotion. Theory, Research and Experience. San Diego, Academic Press, 1989, pp 55–82.
Coyone JC, Gottlieb BH: The mismeasure of coping by checklist. J Pers 1996;64:959–991.
Gottschalk LA: Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. New Findings and Clinical Applications. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1995.
Gottschalk LA: Research using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales in English since 1969; in Gottschalk LA, Lolas F, Viney LL (eds): Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Significance in Clinical Medicine and Psychiatry. Heidelberg, Springer, 1986, pp 29–53.
Lebovits AH, Holland JC: Use of the Gottschalk-Gleser Verbal Content Analysis Scales with medically ill patients; in Gottschalk LA, Lolas F, Viney LL (eds): Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Significance in Clinical Medicine and Psychiatry. Heidelberg, Springer, 1986, pp 133–148.
Viney LL: Expression of positive emotion by people who are physically ill: Is it evidence of defending or coping?; in Gottschalk LA, Lolas F, Viney LL (eds): Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior. Significance in Clinical Medicine and Psychiatry. Heidelberg, Springer, 1986, pp 215–224.
Heszen-Niejodek I: The doctor and a patient. Psychological research. Krakow, Universitas, 1992.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Luschene RE: Manual for the State-Traite Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.
Parker JD, Endler NS: Coping and defense: A historical overview; in Zeidner M, Endler NS (eds): Handbook of Coping. Theory, Research, Applications. New York, Wiley, 1996, pp 3–23.
Lazarus R, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer, 1984.
Gottschalk LA, Fronczek J: Defensive mechanisms and hope as protective factors in physical and mental disorders; in Henschel U (ed): The Concept of Defense Mechanisms in Contemporary Psychology. Heidelberg, Springer, 1993, pp 339–359.
Faller H, Buelzebruck H, Schilling S, Drings P, Lang H: Beeinflussen psychologische Faktoren die Überlebenszeit bei Krebskranken? II. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung mit Bronchialkarzinomkranken. Psychother Med Psychol 1997;47:206–218.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.