The author reaches the conclusion that the psychosomatic specificity hypothesis for the etiology of peptic ulcer, which was based on physiological, clinical, psycho-analytical and biographical data, has been shown to be compatible with the results of later physiological, behavioral, epidemiological and sociological observations. There have, however, been too few studies in which predictions derived from the hypothesis were systematically tested by apropriate validated methods. As a result the hypothesis still stands more or less at the same degree of probability as when it was formulated. The author indicates how more direct ways of testing would be possible by animal, clinical-investigative, epidemiological, and psycho-therapeutic studies.

This content is only available via PDF.
© 1971 S. Karger AG, Basel
1971
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.