Background: Obese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have been shown to present with larger curve magnitudes preoperatively. However, the effect of obesity on shoulder balance in AIS remains unknown. The purpose of our study was to determine if overweight and obese patients with AIS have worse radiographic shoulder balance on initial presentation when compared with normal weight patients. Methods: AIS patients <18 years old, with Lenke 1 or 2 curves, who underwent a posterior spinal fusion between March 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. BMI-for-age percentiles as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention were used: obese (≥95th percentile), overweight (85th to <95th percentile), and normal weight (5th to <85th percentile). Shoulder height was measured via the radiographic shoulder height (RSH) method, with an RSH ≤ 1 cm considered balanced. The primary outcome was preoperative shoulder balance. Secondary outcomes included postoperative shoulder balance, major curve correction, and UIV selection. Results: One hundred eighty-four patients (116 [63%] normal weight and 68 [37%] overweight/obese) were included. The mean age at surgery was 13.1 ± 2 years, and mean follow-up was 17.4 ± 13 months. Preoperative shoulder imbalance was significantly greater in the overweight/obese group compared to the normal weight group (1.9 ± 1 cm vs. 1.5 ± 1 cm, p = 0.04). The odds ratio of presenting with unbalanced shoulders was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.02–3.83, p = 0.04) for the overweight/obese group. No significant differences were found for postoperative shoulder balance, UIV selection, or major curve correction. Conclusions: Overweight and obese patients with AIS are twice as likely to present with unbalanced shoulders preoperatively; however, this difference is not clinically relevant with a mean difference of 0.4 cm between cohorts. Finally, the preoperative BMI percentile did not show a significant effect on the chosen UIV or curve magnitude correction. Level of Evidence: Level III: this is a retrospective case-control study.

1.
Goodbody
CM
,
Sankar
WN
,
Flynn
JM
.
Presentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the bigger the kid, the bigger the curve
.
J Pediatr Orthop
.
2017
;
37
:
41
6
. .
2.
Gilbert
SR
,
Savage
AJ
,
Whitesell
R
,
Conklin
MJ
,
Fineberg
NS
.
BMI and magnitude of scoliosis at presentation to a specialty clinic
.
Pediatrics
.
2015
;
135
:
e1417
24
. .
3.
Margalit
A
,
McKean
G
,
Constantine
A
,
Thompson
CB
,
Lee
RJ
,
Sponseller
PD
.
Body mass hides the curve: thoracic scoliometer readings vary by body mass index value
.
J Pediatr Orthop
.
2017
;
37
:
e255
60
. .
4.
Li
Y
,
Binkowski
L
,
Grzywna
A
,
Robbins
CB
,
Caird
MS
,
Farley
FA
,
Is obesity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis associated with larger curves and worse surgical outcomes?
Spine
.
2017
;
42
:
E156
62
. .
5.
O’neill
PJ
,
Karol
LA
,
Shindle
MK
,
Elerson
EE
,
BrintzenhofeSzoc
KM
,
Katz
DE
,
Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
.
JBJS
.
2005
;
87
:
1069
74
.
6.
Newton
PO
,
Bastrom
TP
,
Yaszay
B
.
Patient-specific risk adjustment improves comparison of infection rates following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
.
J Bone Joint Surg Am
.
2017
;
99
:
1846
50
. .
7.
Snowden
RD
,
Prusick
VW
,
Oeffinger
DJ
,
Iwinski
HJ
,
Muchow
RD
.
Increased acute postoperative wound problems following spinal fusion in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
.
J Pediatr Orthop B
.
2019
;
28
:
374
9
. .
8.
Lee
CS
,
Hwang
CJ
,
Lee
DH
,
Cho
JH
.
Does fusion to T2 compared with T3/T4 lead to improved shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a double thoracic curve?
J Pediatr Orthop B
.
2019
;
28
:
32
9
. .
9.
Jian
YM
,
Yang
SH
,
Hu
MH
.
Assessment of change of shoulder balance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after correctional surgery
.
Orthop Surg
.
2018
;
10
:
198
204
. .
10.
Brooks
JT
,
Bastrom
TP
,
Bartley
CE
,
Lonner
BS
,
Shah
SA
,
Miyanji
F
,
Search of the ever-elusive postoperative shoulder balance: is the T2 UIV the key?
Spine Deform
.
2018
;
6
:
707
11
.
11.
Bjerke
BT
,
Saiyed
R
,
Cheung
ZB
,
Uppstrom
TJ
,
Shifflett
GD
,
Cunningham
ME
.
Does adolescent obesity affect surgical presentation and radiographic outcome for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
J Pediatr Orthop B
.
2017
;
26
:
53
8
. .
12.
Center for Disease Control (CDC)
.
Defining childhood obesity
;
2021
. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html.
13.
O’Brien
MF
,
Kuklo
TR
,
Blanke
KM
,
Lenke
LG
.
Spinal deformity study group radiographic measurement manual
;
2021
14.
Han
X
,
Liu
Z
,
Qiu
Y
,
Sha
S
,
Yan
H
,
Jin
M
,
Clavicle chest cage angle difference: is it a radiographic and clinical predictor of postoperative shoulder imbalance in lenke i adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
Spine
.
2016
;
41
:
1346
54
.
15.
Yagi
M
,
Takemitsu
M
,
Machida
M
.
Chest cage angle difference and rotation of main thoracic curve are independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
.
Spine
.
2013
;
38
(
19
):
E1209
15
. .
16.
Pahys
JM
,
Vivas
AC
,
Samdani
AF
,
Cunn
G
,
Betz
RR
,
Newton
PO
,
Assessment of proximal junctional kyphosis and shoulder balance with proximal screws versus hooks in posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
.
Spine
.
2018
;
43
:
E1322
E1328
.
17.
Hong
JY
,
Suh
SW
,
Yang
JH
,
Park
SY
,
Han
JH
.
Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison of the 4 available methods
.
Spine
.
2013
;
38
:
E1684
90
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.