Aims: To gain a better understanding of how clinical outcome in children with ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) correlates with clinical and imaging parameters on admission. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients with bAVMs, aged 18 or below, managed at their hospital between January 1992 and December 2008. Clinical outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Patients with ruptured bAVMs were analyzed; their clinical parameters and computerized tomography findings on admission were recorded. Clinical outcome was then evaluated against admission scores using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Grading System of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (WFNS-SAH), the Spetzler-Martin grade, the intracerebral hemorrhage score and 2 other independent parameters, namely pupillary response and significant focal neurological injuries. Spearman’s correlation coefficient, linear regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: 40 pediatric patients with bAVMs were found and 32 of them presented with hemorrhage (80%). In the 32 children with ruptured bAVMS, follow-up ranged between 7 and 204 months (median 100.5 months). The complete excision/obliteration rate as confirmed by digital subtraction angiography was 73.3%. The mRS scores at the last follow-up were: grades 0–II in 87.5%; grades IV–V in 6.25%, and grade VI in 6.25%. The Spetzler-Martin grade, the intracerebral hemorrhage score, the WFNS-SAH grade, the GCS scores, and a combined scoring scale consisting of the GCS, pupillary response and significant focal neurological injuries correlated significantly with clinical outcome 6 months after hemorrhage. However, on the scatter diagrams, it appeared that only the combined scoring scale might be valid for clinical practice. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the combined scoring scale was a statistically significant independent predictor of clinical outcome 6 months after hemorrhage. Conclusion: In this series of pediatric patients with ruptured bAVMs, although various grading scales correlated significantly with clinical outcome 6 months after hemorrhage, only the combined scoring scale might have the potential to be applied to predict clinical outcome in these children.

Keywords:
Brain arteriovenous malformation, Ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation, Admission parameters
1.
Bristol RE, Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF, Rekate HL, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM: Surgical management of arteriovenous malformations in children. J Neurosurg 2006;105(2 suppl):88–93.
2.
Fong D, Chan ST: Arteriovenous malformation in children. Childs Nerv Syst 1988;4:199–203.
3.
Kiriş T, Sencer A, Sahinbaş M, Sencer S, Imer M, Izgi N: Surgical results in pediatric Spetzler-Martin grades I–III intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:69–74.
4.
Klimo P, Rao G, Brockmeyer D: Pediatric arteriovenous malformations: a 15-year experience with an emphasis on residual and recurrent lesions. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:31–37.
5.
Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Rollo M: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations in children. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:145–156.
6.
Hartmann A, Mast H, Mohr JP, Koennecke HC, Osipov A, Pile-Spellman J, Duong H, Yong WL: Morbidity of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Stroke 1998;29:931–934.
7.
Kuhmonen J, Piippo A, Vaart K, Karatas A, Ishii K, Winkler P, Niemela M, Porras M, Hernesniemi J: Early surgery for ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;94:111–114.
8.
Lawton MT, Du R, Tran MN, Achrol AS, McCulloch CE, Johnston SC, Quinnine NJ, Young WL: Effect of presenting hemorrhage on outcome after microsurgical resection of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2005;56:485–493.
9.
Meyer PG, Orliaguet GA, Zerah M, Charron B, Jarreau MM, Brunelle F, Laurent-Vannier A, Carli PA: Emergency management of deeply comatose children with acute rupture of cerebral arteriovebous malformations. Can J Anesth 2000;48:758–766.
10.
Sanchez-Mejia RO, Chennupati SK, Gupta N, Fullerton H, Young WL, Lawton MT: Superior outcomes in children compared with adults after microsurgical resection of brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2006;105(2 suppl):82–87.
11.
Godoy DA, Piñero G, Di Napoli M: Predicting mortality in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: can modification to original score improve the prediction? Stroke 2006;37:1038–1044.
12.
Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC: The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2001;32:891–897.
13.
Hamilton MG, Spetzler RF: The prospective application of a grading system for arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1994;34:2–6.
14.
van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J: Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients: Stroke 1988;19:604–607.
15.
Wilson L, Hareendran A: Structured Interview for the Modified Rankin Scale: Questionnaire and Guidelines. 2002. http://www.psychology.stir.ac.uk/staff/wilson/documents/MRS_Structured_interview.pdf (accessed January 5, 2009).
16.
Berry M, Bannister LH, Standring SM: Nervous system; in Williams PL (ed): Gray’s Anatomy, ed 38. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1995, pp 1130–1131.
17.
Chiang VL, Claus EB, Awad IA: Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2000;46:28–35.
18.
Buis DR, Dirven CM, Lagerwaard FJ, Mandl ES, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Eshghi DS, van den Berg R, Baayen JC, Meijer OW, Slotman BJ, Vandertop WP: Radiosurgery of brain arteriovenous malformations in children. J Neurol 2008;255:551–560.
19.
Lasjaunias P, Hui F, Zerah M, Garcia-Monaco R, Malherbe V, Rodesch G, Tanaka A, Alvarez H: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations in children. Childs Nerv Syst 1995;11:66–79.
20.
Nicolato A, Foroni R, Seghedoni A, Martines V, Lupidi F, Zampieri P, Sandri MF, Ricci U, Mazza C, Beltramello A, Gerosa M, Bricolo A: Leksell gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 2005;21:301–307.
21.
Pan DH, Kuo YH, Guo WY, Chung WY, Wu HM, Liu KD, Chang YC, Wang LW, Wong TT: Gamma Knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations in children: a 13-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;1:296–304.
22.
Reyns N, Blond S, Gauvrit JY, Touzet G, Coche B, Pruvo JP, Dhellemmes P: Role of radiosurgery in the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations in the pediatric age group: data from a 100-patient series. Neurosurgery 2007;60:268–276.
23.
Zadeh G, Andrade-Souza YM, Tsao MN, Scora D, Armstrong D, Humphreys R, Rutka J, Drake J, Dirks P, Schwartz ML: Pediatric arteriovenous malformation: University of Toronto experience using stereotactic radiosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:195–199.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.