Suprasegmental effects following selective posterior rhizotomy have been frequently reported. However, few studies have used validated functional outcome measures to report the surgical results beyond 3 years. The authors analyzed data obtained from the McGill Rhizotomy Database to determine the long-term impact of lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy on fine motor skills. The study population comprised children with debilitating spasticity who underwent SPR and were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Quantitative standardized assessments of upper extremity function were obtained using the fine motor skills section of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS) test. Of 70 patients who met the entry criteria for the study, 45 and 25 completed the 3- and 5-year assessments, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant improvements in grasping, hand use, eye-hand coordination, and manual dexterity at 1 year after SPR. More importantly, all improvements were maintained at 3 and 5 years following SPR. This study supports that significant improvements in upper extremity fine motor function using the PDMS evaluative measure are present after SPR and that these suprasegmental benefits are durable.

1.
Peterson MC, Palmer FB: Advances in prevention and treatment of cerebral palsy. MRDD Res Rev 2000;7:30–37.
2.
Beck AJ, Gaskill SJ, Marlin AE: Improvement in upper extremity function and trunk control after selective posterior rhizotomy. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47:704–707.
3.
Bloom KK, Nazar GB: Functional assessment following selective posterior rhizotomy in spastic cerebral palsy. Child’s Nerv Syst 1994;10:84–86.
4.
Buckon CE, Sienko Thomas S, Aiona MD, Piatt JH: Assessment of upper-extremity function in children with spastic diplegia before and after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996;38:967–975.
5.
Craft S, Park TS, White DA, Schatz J, Noetzel M, Arnold S: Changes in cognitive performance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy following selective dorsal rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;23:68–74.
6.
Dudgeon BJ, Libby AK, McLaughlin JF, Hays RM, Bjornson KF, Roberts TS: Prospective measurement of functional changes after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994;75:46–53.
7.
Kinghorn J: Upper extremity functional changes following selective posterior rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:502–507.
8.
Lewin JE, Mix CM, Gaebler-Spira D: Self-help and upper extremity changes in 36 children with cerebral palsy subsequent to selective posterior rhizotomy and intensive occupational and physical therapy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1993;13:25–42.
9.
Loewen P, Steinbok P, Holsti L, MacKay M: Upper extremity performance and self-care skill changes in children with spastic cerebral palsy following selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998;29:191–198.
10.
Steinbok P, Reiner A, Beauchamp RD, Cochrane DD, Keyes R: Selective functional posterior rhizotomy for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy in children: Review of 50 consecutive cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 1992;18:34–42.
11.
Abbott R, Johann-Murphy M, Shiminski- Maher T, Quartermain D, Forem SL, Gold JT, Epstein FJ: Selective dorsal rhizotomy: Outcome and complications in treating spastic cerebral palsy. Neurosurgery 1993;33:851–857.
12.
Mittal S, Farmer JP, Poulin C, Silver K: Reliability of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 2001;95:67–75.
13.
Folio MR, Fewell RR: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards. Austin, PRO-ED, 1983.
14.
Stokes NA, Deitz JL, Crowe TK: The Peabody Developmental Fine Motor Scale: An interrater reliability study. Am J Occup Ther 1990;44:334–340.
15.
Palisano RJ, Kolobe TH, Haley SM, Lowes LP, Jones SL: Validity of the Peabody Developmental Gross Motor Scale as an evaluative measure of infants receiving physical therapy. Phys Ther 1995;75:939–951.
16.
Schmidt LS, Westcott SL, Crowe TK: Interrater reliability of the gross motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales with 4- and 5-year-old children. Pediatr Phys Ther 1993;5:169–175.
17.
Chicoine MR, Park TS, Kaufman BA: Selective dorsal rhizotomy and rates of orthopedic surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 1997;86:34–39.
18.
Cosgrove AP, Corry I, Graham HK: Botulinum toxin in the management of the lower limb in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994;36:386–396.
19.
Ubhi T, Bhakta BB, Ives HL, Allgar V, Roussounis SH: Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial to the effect of botulinum toxin on walking in cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:481–487.
20.
Abbott R: Complications with selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 1992;18:43–47.
21.
Steinbok P, Schrag C: Complications after selective posterior rhizotomy for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998;28:300–313.
22.
von Koch CS, Park TS, Steinbok P, Smyth M, Peacock WJ: Selective posterior rhizotomy and intrathecal baclofen for the treatment of spasticity. Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:57–65.
23.
Peacock WJ, Arens LJ, Berman B: Cerebral palsy spasticity: Selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosci 1987;13:61–66.
24.
Lazareff JA, Mata-Acosta AM, Garcia-Mendez MA: Limited selective posterior rhizotomy for the treatment of spasticity secondary to infantile cerebral palsy: A preliminary report. Neurosurgery 1990;27:535–538.
25.
Cohen AR, Webster HC: How selective is selective posterior rhizotomy? Surg Neurol 1991;35:267–272.
26.
McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Hays RM, Hoffinger SA, Armantrout EA, Roberts TS: The role of selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy: Critical evaluation of a prospective clinical series. Dev Med Child Neurol 1994;36:755–769.
27.
Albright AL, Barry MJ, Fasick MP, Janosky J: Effects of continuous intrathecal baclofen infusion and selective posterior rhizotomy on upper extremity spasticity. Pediatr Neurosurg 1995;23:82–85.
28.
Peacock WJ, Arens LJ: Selective posterior rhizotomy for the relief of spasticity in cerebral palsy. South Afr Med J 1982;62:119–124.
29.
Arens LJ, Peacock WJ, Peter J: Selective posterior rhizotomy: A long-term follow-up study. Child’s Nerv Syst 1989;5:148–152.
30.
Fasano VA, Broggi G, Zeme S: Intraoperative electrical stimulation for functional posterior rhizotomy. Scan J Rehab Med Suppl 1988;17:149–154.
31.
Schijman E, Erro MG, Meana NV: Selective posterior rhizotomy: Experience of 30 cases. Child’s Nerv Syst 1993;9:474–477.
32.
Steinbok P, Gustavsson B, Kestle JR, Reiner A, Cochrane DD: Relationship of intraoperative electrophysiological criteria to outcome after selective functional posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 1995;83:18–26.
33.
DeMatteo C, Law M, Russell D, Pollock N, Rosenbaum P, Walter S: The reliability and validity of the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1993;13:1–18.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.