The ability to perform a ‘selective’ dorsal rhizotomy has been challenged. EMG responses are inconsistent and often do not represent reflex responses. We perform nonselective partial dorsal rhizotomy (NSPDR) when reflex response is not evident. Ten children undergoing primarily NSPDR were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Modified Ashworth Scale, gait lab analyses gross motor function measure and the NSPDR was performed by nonselectively sectioning 50–75% of the dorsal roots not demonstrating a reflex response. Standard selective rhizotomy was performed in the remainder. Only 17 of 106 (16%) dorsal roots demonstrated reflex responses. The results reported in this study demonstrate a benefit to patients undergoing primarily NSPDR which is similar to that reported for patients in whom a selective procedure was intended.

Keywords:
Dorsal rhizotomy, Spasticity, Cerebral palsy
1.
Sherrington GS: Decerebrate rigidity and reflex coordination of movement. J Physiol 1892;22:319–337.
2.
Foerster O: On the indications and results of the excision of posterior spinal nerve roots in man. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1913;16:463–475.
3.
Fasano VA, Barolat-Romama G, Zeme S, Sguazzi A: Electrophysiological assessment of spinal circuits in spasticity by direct dorsal root stimulation. Neurosurgery 1979;4:146–151.
4.
Peacock WJ, Arens LJ: Selective posterior rhizotomy for the relief of spasticity in cerebral palsy. S Afr Med J 1982;62:119–124.
5.
Phillips LH, Park TS: Electrophysiological studies of selective posterior rhizotomy patients; in Park TS, Phillips LH, Peacock WH (eds): Neurosurgery: State of the Art Reviews: Management of Spasticity in Cerebral Palsy and Spinal Cord Injury. Philadelphia, Hanley & Belfus, 1989, pp 459–469.
6.
Newberg NL, Gooch JL, Walker ML: Intraoperative monitoring in selective dorsal rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosurg 1991–92;17:124–127.
7.
Park TS, Gaffney PE, Kaufman BA, Molleston MC: Selective lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy immediately caudal to the conus medullaris for cerebral palsy spasticity. Neurosurgery 1993;33:929–934.
8.
Steinbok P, Keyes R, Langill L, Cochrane DD: The validity of electrophysiological criteria used in selective functional posterior rhizotomy for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 1994;81:354–361.
9.
Wright FV, Sheil EMH, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S: Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:239–247.
10.
Logigian EL, Wolinsky JS, Soriano SG, Madsen JR, Scott RM: H reflex studies in cerebral palsy patients undergoing partial dorsal rhizotomy. Muscle Nerve 1994;17:539–549.
11.
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S: The gross motor function measure: A means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1989;31:341–352.
12.
Bohannon RW, Smith MB: Interrater reliability of a modified ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67:206–207.
13.
Staudt LA, Nuwer MR, Peacock WJ: Intraoperative monitoring during selective posterior rhizotomy: Technique and patient outcome. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:296–309.
14.
Peacock WJ, Staudt LA: Functional outcomes following selective posterior rhizotomy in children with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 1991;74:380–385.
15.
Vaughan CL, Berman B, Peacock WJ: Cerebral palsy and rhizotomy: A 3-year follow-up evaluation with gait analysis. J Neurosurg 1991;74:178–184.
16.
Boscarino LF, Ounpuu MS, Davis RB, Gage JR, DeLuca PA: Effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy on gait in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:174–179.
17.
Cahan LD, Adams JM, Perry J, Beeler LM: Instrumented gait analysis after selected dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1990;32:1037–1043.
18.
McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, Price R, Tempkin N: Selective dorsal rhizotomy: Efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:220–232.
19.
Steinbock P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong RW, Cochrane DD: A randomized clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy to physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:178–184.
20.
Landau WM, Hunt CC: Dorsal rhizotomy, a treatment of unproven efficacy. J Child Neurol 1990;5:174–178.
21.
Hays RM, Mclaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Stephens K, Roberts TS, Price R: Electrophysiological monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy, and spasticity and GMFM performance. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:233–238.
22.
Steinbok P, Gustavsson B, Kestle JRW, Reiner A, Cochran DD: Relationship of intraoperative electrophysiological criteria to outcome after selective functional posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 1995;83:18–26.
23.
Rivera ADC, Burke T, Schiff SJ, Weiss IP: An experimental study of reflex variability in selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 1994;81:885–894.
24.
Weiss IP, Schiff SJ: Reflex variability in selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 1993;79:346–353.
25.
Warf BC, Nelson KR: The electrophysiologic responses to dorsal rootlet stimulation during partial dorsal rhizotomy are inconsistent. Pediatr Neurosurg 1996;25:13–19.
26.
Abbott R: Electrical stimulation in selective dorsal rhizotomy; in Devinsky O, Beric A, Dogali M (eds): Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain and Spinal Cord. New York, Raven Press, 1993, pp 263–270.
27.
Cohen AR, Webster HC: How selective is selective posterior rhizotomy? Surg Neurol 1991;35:267–272.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.