Although considerable scientific work has been published on the role of the skull base in craniosynostosis, the changes with age throughout childhood have not been fully outlined. The realisation that little attention has been paid to the posterior skull in craniosynostosis, resulted in renewed interest in skull base growth. The availability of computer-based image analysis provides a new accurate method of study in three dimensions. Using three-dimensional visualisation techniques, 34 points of the skull base were identified on CT scans of 50 children with craniosynostosis of various types, aged from 1 month to 5 years. Several distances and angles between the various landmarks were measured in an attempt to quantify the growth of skull fossae with age. Comparisons were made with normal controls. In children with craniosynostosis, the anterior fossa was overdeveloped in the males, whereas in the females remained underdeveloped throughout the first 2 years of life. The body of the sphenoid showed moderate underdevelopment in the first 2 years in both sexes, the effect being more prominent in the males. The middle fossae showed overdevelopment in both sexes in the first 2 years of life. The posterior fossa was underdeveloped in both sexes in the first 2 years of life, the effect being more prominent in the females. Craniosynostosis seems to affect both sexes to a similar degree, but there are regional differences in the growth pattern. Better understanding of the normal growth pattern of the skull base and the effect of craniosynostosis upon it may assist our approach to surgical treatment and in particular the role of anterior and posterior skull expansive surgery.

1.
Moss ML: The pathogenesis of premature cranial synostosis in man. Acta Anat 1959;37:351–370.
2.
Moss ML: Functional anatomy of cranial synostosis. Childs Brain 1975;1:22–33.
3.
Carinci F, Avantaggiato A, Curioni C: Crouzon syndrome: Cephalometric analysis and evaluation of pathogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:201–209.
4.
Slomic AM, Bernier JP, Morissette J, Renier D: A craniometric study of sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1992;12:49–54.
5.
Slomic AM, Bernier JP, Morissette J, Renier D: A craniometric study of bicoronal craniosynostosis (BCC). J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1992;12:174–181.
6.
Hoyte DA: The cranial base in normal and abnormal skull growth. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1991;2:515–537.
7.
Kreiborg S, Marsh JL, Cohen MM Jr, Liversage M, Pedersen H, Skovby F, Borgesen SE, Vannier MW: Comparative three-dimensional analysis of CT-scans of the calvaria and cranial base in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1993;21:181–188.
8.
Leboucq N, Montoya P, Martinez Y, Castan P: Value of 3D imaging for the study of craniofacial malformations in children. J Neuroradiol 1991;18:225–239.
9.
Marsh JL, Vannier MW: Cranial base changes following surgical treatment of craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate J 1986;23(suppl 1):9–18.
10.
Marsh JL, Vannier MW: The anatomy of the cranio-orbital deformities of craniosynostosis: Insights from 3-D images of CT scans. Clin Plast Surg 1987;14:49–60.
11.
Abramson DL, Janecka IP, Mulliken JB: Abnormalities of the cranial base in synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 1996;7:426–428.
12.
Carr M, Posnick JC, Pron G, Armstrong D: Cranio-orbito-zygomatic measurements from standard CT scans in unoperated Crouzon and Apert infants: Comparison with normal controls. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:129–136.
13.
Genitori L, Cavalheiro S, Lena G, Dollo C, Choux M: Skull base in trigonocephaly. Pediatr Neurosurg 1991–92;17:175–181.
14.
Genitori L, Zanon N, Denis D, Erdincler P, Achouri M, Lena G, Choux M: The skull base in plagiocephaly. Childs Nerv Syst 1994;10:217–223.
15.
Posnick JC, Lin KY, Jhawar BJ, Armstrong D: Crouzon syndrome: Quantitative assessment of presenting deformity and surgical results based on CT scans. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:1027–1037.
16.
Richtsmeier JT: Craniofacial growth in Apert syndrome as measured by finite-element scaling analysis. Acta Anat 1988;133:50–56.
17.
Richtsmeier JT: Beyond morphing: Visualization to predict a child’s skull growth. Adv Imaging 1993;8:24–27.
18.
Richtsmeier JT, Grausz HM, Morris GR, Marsh JL, Vannier MW: Growth of the cranial base in craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:55–67.
19.
Beals SP, Francis PM, Rekate HL, Manwaring KH, Pittman H, Reiff J: Crouzon’s syndrome and Chiari I malformation; in Montoya AG (ed): Craniofacial Surgery. Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Society of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Santiago De Compostela Spain, 1991. Bologna, Monduzzi Editore, 1992, pp 181–183.
20.
Cinalli G, Renier D, Sebag G, Sainte-Rose C, Arnaud E, Pierre-Khan A: Chronic tonsillar herniation in Crouzon’s and Apert’s syndromes; the role of the premature synostosis of the lambdoid suture. J Neurosurg 1995;83:575–582.
21.
Sgouros S, Goldin JH, Hockley AD, Wake MJC: Skull base growth in childhood. Pediatr Neurosurg 1999:31;259–268.
22.
Glat PM, Freund RM, Spector JA, Levine J, Noz M, Bookstein FL, McCarthy JG, Cutting CB: A classification of plagiocephaly utilizing a three-dimensional computer analysis of cranial base landmarks. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:469–474.
23.
Ohman JC, Richtsmeier JT: Perspectives on craniofacial growth. Clin Plast Surg 1994;21:489–499.
24.
Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA: Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. California, Duxbury Press, 1983, pp 75–125.
25.
Posnick JC, Lin KY, Jhawar BJ, Armstrong D: Apert syndrome: Quantitative assessment by CT scan of presenting deformity and surgical results after first-stage reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:489–497.
26.
Lavelle CL: Craniofacial growth in patients with craniosynostosis. Acta Anat 1985;123:201–206.
27.
Sgouros S, Goldin JH, Hockley AD, Wake MJC: Posterior skull surgery in craniosynostosis. Child’s Nerv Syst 1996;12:727–733.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.