Nonaccidental injury accounts for nearly one quarter of all hospital admissions for head injury in infancy, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Long-term outcome in survivors, however, has been incompletely studied. In this series, 84 infants 2 years of age and younger with the shaking-impact syndrome consecutively admitted to a single hospital between 1978 and 1988 were identified. A questionnaire detailing current medical, developmental, and behavioral status was developed, and attempts were made to locate the 62 children surviving the acute injury. Family instability and strict confidentiality restrictions precluded locating the majority of children, but 14 children with demographic and injury characteristics similar to those of the overall group were contacted at an average of 9 years after injury. Seven children were severely disabled or vegetative, 2 were moderately disabled, and 5 had a good outcome. Of the latter group, 3 had repeated grades and/or required tutoring. Acute factors associated with poor outcome included unre-sponsiveness on admission, need for intubation, age less than 6 months, and bilateral or unilateral diffuse hypodensity on CT scan. All children with bilateral diffuse hypodensity and loss of gray-white differentiation on CT scan remained blind, retarded, nonverbal, and nonambulatory in spite of aggressive medical and surgical management. This study suggests that the majority of children surviving the shaking-impact syndrome suffer major permanent morbidity, and that acute factors predicting long-term outcome may help guide aggressiveness of care.

Keywords:
Head injury, Infants, Shaking-impact syndrome, Child abuse, Subdural hematoma, Outcome
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.