Tumors of the terminal ileum are rare, and their diagnosis and treatment standards have not been established. The effectiveness of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) in the duodenum and colon has been reported [1, 2]; however, its effectiveness in the small intestine is rarely reported [3]. We present a case of an ileum adenoma diagnosed using magnifying endoscopy and completely resected using UEMR (online supplementary video; for all online suppl. material, see https://doi.org/10.1159/000531774).

A 56-year-old woman with a lesion in the terminal ileum was referred to our hospital for treatment. Colonoscopy revealed a 10 mm slightly depressed lesion with marginal elevation in the terminal ileum (Fig. 1a, b). Magnifying narrow-band imaging showed a tubular surface pattern with regular vessels on the slightly elevated marginal area and regular brown vessels on the slightly depressed central area (Fig. 1c). Magnifying chromoendoscopy using crystal violet staining showed a branch-like or gyrus-like pattern on the marginal area and a roundish and tubular structure on the central area (Fig. 1d). The lesion was diagnosed as an adenoma in the terminal ileum, similar to a colonic adenoma; hence, we decided to perform UEMR. The lesion was completely removed using a 10 mm snare (10 mm, Captivator Ⅱ; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) with an electric generator (Endocut Q effect 2, interval 1, duration 4; VIO 300D; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany) (Fig. 2). No intra- or post-operative complications occurred. The pathological diagnosis revealed that it was an intestinal-type low grade adenoma with negative margins. At the margins of the lesions, the tumor tended to form a villous structure, while the center appeared tubular with a relatively flat surface (Fig. 3). These histopathological findings were consistent with the magnifying endoscopic findings.

Fig. 1.

Endoscopic images showing a 10 mm slightly depressed lesion with marginal elevation in the terminal ileum, suggesting type 0-Ⅱa in the Paris classification: in white light (a); chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine (b). c Magnifying narrow-bind imaging: a tubular surface pattern with regular vessels on the marginal elevation area and regular brown vessels on the slightly depressed area, suggesting the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification type 2. d Magnifying chromoendoscopy image using crystal violet staining showing a pit pattern like type Ⅳ on the marginal area and type ⅢL on the slightly depressed area.

Fig. 1.

Endoscopic images showing a 10 mm slightly depressed lesion with marginal elevation in the terminal ileum, suggesting type 0-Ⅱa in the Paris classification: in white light (a); chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine (b). c Magnifying narrow-bind imaging: a tubular surface pattern with regular vessels on the marginal elevation area and regular brown vessels on the slightly depressed area, suggesting the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification type 2. d Magnifying chromoendoscopy image using crystal violet staining showing a pit pattern like type Ⅳ on the marginal area and type ⅢL on the slightly depressed area.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

After immersing the terminal ileum with normal saline andfloating the lesion in it, we performed UEMR.

Fig. 2.

After immersing the terminal ileum with normal saline andfloating the lesion in it, we performed UEMR.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Histological examination (hematoxylin and eosin stain): A villous structure at the margins of the lesions and a tubular structure with a relatively flat surface at the center. The lesion size was 13 × 9 mm.

Fig. 3.

Histological examination (hematoxylin and eosin stain): A villous structure at the margins of the lesions and a tubular structure with a relatively flat surface at the center. The lesion size was 13 × 9 mm.

Close modal

Because of the limited luminal space in the terminal ileum, it might be difficult to completely remove a lesion using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, especially in cases where submucosal injection would prevent snaring. UEMR allows for easier and complete capture of the lesions by suctioning the lumen air and filling it with water, thereby making flat lesions smaller and more polypoid. Therefore, UEMR may be an effective method for terminal ileum tumor resection.

Ethical approval was not required for this study in accordance with local/national guidelines. Written informed consent was given by the patient for publication of this report, including images.

Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

No funding was received.

Atsushi Michigami wrote the manuscript and is the article guarantor. Satoshi Maeda performed the procedures. Shin Ichihara helped write the manuscript and developed the histological images. All authors revised this case report and approved the final version of the manuscript.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

1.
Yamasaki
Y
,
Uedo
N
,
Takeuchi
Y
,
Higashino
K
,
Hanaoka
N
,
Akasaka
T
et al
.
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas
.
Endoscopy
.
2018
;
50
(
2
):
154
8
.
2.
Binmoeller
KF
,
Weilert
F
,
Shah
J
,
Bhat
Y
,
Kane
S
.
“Underwater” EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video)
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2012
;
75
(
5
):
1086
91
.
3.
Uedo
N
,
Nemeth
A
,
Toth
E
,
Thorlacius
H
.
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of a large depressed adenoma in the ileum
.
Endoscopy
.
2014
46
Suppl 1 UCTN
E336
7
.