The efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin for prophylaxis of thrombo-embolism in orthopaedic surgery were compared using meta-analysis techniques. Twenty-two studies were included, 2 of which compared LMWH to warfarin. The mean probabilities to develop deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism and major and minor bleeding using UFH were: 0.21 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.18-0.24); 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.02); 0.05 (95% CI: 0.03-0.07), and 0.19 (95 % CI: 0.17-0.22), respectively. The relative risk (RR) of DVT for LMWH vs. UFH was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.60-0.91), p < 0.05 and for LMWH vs. warfarin 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), p < 0.05. The RR of minor bleeding for LMWH vs. UFH was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.92), p < 0.05. The RR of minor bleeding for LMWH vs. warfarin was 3.28 (95% CI: 2.21-4.70), p < 0.05. Conclusion: in orthopaedic surgery, LMWH is significantly superior to both UFH and warfarin in the prevention of DVT and results in significantly less minor bleeding complications when compared to UFH, but significantly more minor bleeding when compared to warfarin.

Keywords:
Low molecular weight heparin, Orthopaedic surgery, Meta-analysis
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.