Acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) continues to be a common clinical problem requiring objective evaluation. Hemo-dynamic testing for acute DVT has been popular, but is inadequate for evaluating asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients with isolated calf vein thrombi. Venous duplex imaging (VDI) has rapidly gained in popularity, and is generally accepted to be the noninvasive technique of choice for the evaluation of patients with acute DVT. Twenty-five reports evaluate gray-scale venous duplex imaging versus ascending phlebography in 2,781 symptomatic patients. The sensitivity for proximal DVT and calf DVT is 96 and 80%, respectively. Seven reports review the use of VDI for surveillance in 857 asymptomatic patients, with an overall sensitivity of 76% for proximal DVT and of 11 % for isolated calf vein thrombosis. The results of color-flow duplex appear to be somewhat better; however, the numbers are considerably smaller. The results for identification of calf vein thrombosis in asymptomatic surveillance patients continue to be poor. VDI appears to be the best noninvasive diagnostic test for acute DVT, and may challenge ascending phlebography as the best diagnostic test for proximal DVT in symptomatic patients, although it will miss 20% of isolated calf DVT. VDI appears to be the best noninvasive screening technique for high-risk asymptomatic patients under surveillance; however, additional correlative studies with ascending phlebography are required. The addition of color Doppler images appears to have improved results, although these higher sensitivities may be the consequence of improved experience as much as the addition of color to the image.

Keywords:
Venous duplex imaging, Acute deep venous thrombosis
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
1993
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.