Ninety consecutive outpatients with acute proximal and/or distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), as shown by phlebography, were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing intravenous adjusted unfractionated heparin (UFH) with subcutaneous fixed doses of a low-molecular-weight heparin (CY216; 225 IC anti-Xa U/kg 12 hourly) for 10 days. The incidence of pulmonary embolism did not differ in the two groups (one episode per group). The comparison between pre- and posttreatment venograms and perfusion lung scans showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) only in the CY216-treated group. The incidence of major adverse reactions (major hemorrhages, relevant hemoglobin fall, and serious thrombocytopenia) was significantly higher (22 vs. 4.5%; p = 0.01) in the UFH-treated group. After a mean follow-up period of 2 years, the incidence of thromboembolic recurrences and that of post-thrombotic manifestations did not differ in the two groups. It is concluded that subcutaneous fixed doses of CY216 are more effective and safer than intravenous adjusted UFH in the treatment of acute DVT.

Keywords:
Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism, Low-molecular-weight heparin, Hemorrhage, Post-thrombotic syndrome
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1990 S. Karger AG, Basel
1990
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.