English has multiple potential acoustic cues to coda stop voicing, including the duration of the preceding vowel, the coda closure duration, and, in some varieties, glottalisation. Glottalisation associated with coda stops appears to be a recent change to Australian English (AusE) with younger speakers using glottalisation more than older speakers in production. Here we report on a study designed to examine AusE-speaking listeners’ perception of cues to coda stop voicing. Listeners were presented with audio stimuli in which preceding vowel duration, coda closure duration, and the relative proportions of the rhyme that these occupy were manipulated and co-varied with the presence or absence of glottalisation. The results show that listeners used preceding vowel duration to cue coda stop voicing, and that coda closure duration was a weaker cue to voicing when not varied in conjunction with preceding vowel duration. In addition, glottalisation facilitated increased perception of coda voicelessness, even when paired with very long preceding vowels, which otherwise signal coda voicing. Although age-related differences in production have previously been reported, we found that both older and younger listeners used glottalisation similarly in perception. These results may provide support for a sound change led by a shift in perception.

1.
Abramson, A. S. (1977). Laryngeal timing in consonant distinctions. Phonetica, 34(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259888
[PubMed]
2.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
Beddor, P. S. (2015). The relation between language users’ perception and production repertoires. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, August 10–14.
4.
Bochner, J. H., Snell, K. B., & MacKenzie, D. J. (1988). Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(2), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396827
[PubMed]
5.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.37. www.praat.org
6.
Brunner, J., & Zygis, M. (2011). Why do glottal stops and low vowels like each other? In W. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 376–379). Hong Kong.
7.
Burnham, D., Estival, D., Fazio, S., Viethen, J., Cox, F., Dale, R., et al. (2011). Building an audio-visual corpus of Australian English: Large corpus collection with an economical portable and replicable black box. In P. Cosi, R. De Mori, G. Di Fabbrizio, & R. Dieraccini (Eds.), Proceedings of Interspeech 2011 (pp. 841–844). Florence, Italy.
8.
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–59. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259312
9.
Cho, T., Whalen, D. H., & Docherty, G. (2019). Voice onset time and beyond: Exploring laryngeal contrast in 19 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 72, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.11.002
[PubMed]
10.
Chong, A., & Garellek, M. (2018). Online perception of glottalized coda stops in American English. Laboratory Phonology, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.70
11.
Coetzee, A. W., Beddor, P. S., Shedden, K., Styler, W., & Wissing, D. (2018). Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.009
12.
Cox, F. (2006). The acoustic characteristics of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of some Australian teenagers. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600600885494
13.
Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2007). An illustration of the IPA: Australian English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100307003192
14.
Cox, F., & Palethorpe, S. (2011). Timing differences in the VC rhyme of standard Australian English and Lebanese Australian English. In W. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 528–531). Hong Kong, 17–21 August.
15.
Cox, F., Palethorpe, S., & Miles, K. (2015). The role of contrast maintenance in the temporal structure of the rhyme. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, 10–14 August.
16.
Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34(5), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918172
17.
Crowhurst, M. J. (2018). The influence of varying vowel phonation and duration on rhythmic grouping biases among Spanish and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.001
18.
Davidson, L. (2016). Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 54, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003
19.
Denes, P. (1955). Effect of Duration on the perception of voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 761–764. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908020
20.
Docherty, G. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin, Germany: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637
21.
Docherty, G., & Foulkes, P. (1999). Derby and Newcastle: Instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 47–71). London, UK: Arnold.
22.
Drager, K. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x
23.
Fitch, H. L. (1981). Distinguishing temporal information for speaking rate from temporal information for intervocalic stop consonant voicing. Haskins Laboratories Status Report of Speech Research, SR-65, 1–32.
24.
Flege, J. E., & Brown, W. S., Jr. (1982). The voicing contrast between /p/ and /b/ as a function of stress and position in utterance. Journal of Phonetics, 10(4), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30999-4
25.
Foulkes, P., & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002
26.
Fowler, C. A. (1992). Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics, 20(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30244-X
27.
Garellek, M. (2011). The benefits of vowel laryngealization on the perception of coda stops in English. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 109, 31–39.
28.
Garellek, M. (2015). Perception of glottalization and phrase-final creak. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(2), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906155
[PubMed]
29.
Gordeeva, O. B., & Scobbie, J. M. (2013). A phonetically versatile contrast: Pulmonic and glottalic voicelessness in Scottish English obstruents and voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000200
30.
Gruenenfelder, T. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1980). Fundamental frequency as a cue to postvocalic consonantal voicing: Some data from speech perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(6), 514–520. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198819
[PubMed]
31.
Hanson, H. M. (2009). Effects of obstruent consonants on fundamental frequency at vowel onset in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3021306
[PubMed]
32.
Harrington, J., Cox, F., & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609708599550
33.
Harrington, J., Kleber, F., & Reubold, U. (2008). Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(5), 2825–2835. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2897042
[PubMed]
34.
Haslerud, V. C. D. (1995). The variable (t) in Sydney adolescent speech: A sociolinguistic study of phonological variation (Cand. Philol dissertation). University of Bergen, Norway.
35.
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001
36.
Hejná, M., & Scanlon, J. (2015). New laryngeal allophony in Manchester English. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, August 10–14.
37.
Higginbottom, E. (1964). Glottal reinforcement in English. Transactions of the Philological Society, 63(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1964.tb01010.x
38.
Hogan, J. T., & Rozsypal, A. J. (1980). Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(5), 1764–1771. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.384304
[PubMed]
39.
House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982
40.
Huffman, M. K. (2005). Segmental and prosodic effects on coda glottalization. Journal of Phonetics, 33(3), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.02.004
41.
Ingram, J. C. L. (1989). Connected speech processes in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608908599410
42.
Jannedy, S., & Weirich, M. (2014). Sound change in an urban setting: Category instability of the palatal fricative in Berlin. Laboratory Phonology, 5(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0005
43.
Keyser, S. J., & Stevens, K. N. (2006). Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language, 82(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0051
44.
Kingston, J., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70(3), 419–454. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1994.0023
45.
Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208–1221. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380986
[PubMed]
46.
Kleber, F., Harrington, J., & Reubold, U. (2012). The relationship between the perception and production of coarticulation during a sound change in progress. Language and Speech, 55(Pt 3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830911422194
[PubMed]
47.
Kohler, K. J. (1982). F0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives. Phonetica, 39(4-5), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261663
[PubMed]
48.
Kuang, J., & Cui, A. (2018). Relative cue weighting in production and perception of an ongoing sound change in Southern Yi. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.002
49.
Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
50.
Liberman, A. M., Delattre, P. C., & Cooper, F. S. (1958). Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech, 1(3), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100301
51.
Lisker, L. (1957). Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced-voiceless distinction in English. Language, 33(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/410949
52.
Lisker, L. (1974). On explaining vowel duration variation. Glossa (London), 8, 233–246.
53.
Lisker, L. (1975). Letter: Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(6 Pt 2), 1547–1551. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380602
[PubMed]
54.
Lisker, L. (1986). “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29(Pt 1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900102
[PubMed]
55.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
56.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096701000101
[PubMed]
57.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1970). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. In B. Halá, M. Romportl & P. Janota (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 563–567). Prague: Academia.
58.
Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1985). Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(6), 1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392651
[PubMed]
59.
Malécot, A. (1970). The lenis-fortis opposition: Its physiological parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47(6), 1588–1592. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912092
[PubMed]
60.
Malisz, Z., Żygis, M., & Pompino-Marschall, B. (2013). Rhythmic structure effects on glottalisation: A study of different speech styles in Polish and German. Laboratory Phonology, 4(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2013-0006
61.
Mathisen, A. G. (1999). Sandwell, West Midlands: Ambiguous perspectives on gender patterns and models of change. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 107–123). London, UK: Arnold.
62.
Ohala, J. (1993). The phonetics of sound change. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives (pp. 237–278). London: Longman.
63.
Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrick, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behaviour (pp. 178–203). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
64.
Ohde, R. N. (1984). Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(1), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.390399
[PubMed]
65.
Penney, J., Cox, F., Miles, K., & Palethorpe, S. (2018). Glottalisation as a cue to coda consonant voicing in Australian English. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.10.001
66.
Penney, J., Cox, F., & Szakay, A. (2019). Glottalisation of utterance-final coda stops in Australian English unstressed syllables. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100319000045
67.
Peterson, G., & Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllabic nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(6), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908183
68.
Pierrehumbert, J. (1994). Knowledge of variation. In Papers from the Parasession on Variation, 30th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 232–256). Chicago, USA.
69.
Pierrehumbert, J. (1995). Prosodic effects on glottal allophones. In O. Fujimura & M. Hirano (Eds.), Vocal fold physiology: Voice quality control (pp. 39–60). San Diego, CA: Singular.
70.
Pinget, A.-F. (2015). The actuation of sound change (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
71.
Pompino-Marschall, B., & Żygis, M. (2010). Glottal marking of vowel-initial words in German. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 52, 1–17.
72.
Port, R. F. (1979). The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics, 7(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31032-0
73.
Port, R. F. (1981). Linguistic timing factors in combination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69(1), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385347
[PubMed]
74.
Port, R. F., & Dalby, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics, 32(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204273
[PubMed]
75.
R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.1). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
76.
Raphael, L. J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(4), 1296–1303. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912974
[PubMed]
77.
Raphael, L. J. (1981). Durations and contexts as cues to word-final cognate opposition in English. Phonetica, 38(1-3), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260019
78.
Redi, L., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2001). Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 29(4), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0145
79.
Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.81
[PubMed]
80.
Roach, P. J. (1973). Glottalization of English /p/, /t/, /k/ and /ʧ/ – a reexamination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300000633
81.
Seyfarth, S., & Garellek, M. (2015). Coda glottalization in American English. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK, August 10–14.
82.
Small, A. M., Jr., & Campbell, R. A. (1962). Temporal differential sensitivity for auditory stimuli. The American Journal of Psychology, 75(3), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419863
[PubMed]
83.
Song, J. Y., Demuth, K., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2012). The development of acoustic cues to coda contrasts in young children learning American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4), 3036–3050. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3687467
[PubMed]
84.
Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
85.
Tollfree, L. (1999). South East London English: Discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent studies in the British Isles (pp. 163–184). London, UK: Arnold.
86.
Tollfree, L. (2001). Variation and change in Australian consonants. In D. B. Blair & P. Collins (Eds.), Varieties of English around the world: English in Australia (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
87.
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
88.
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759
89.
Westbury, J. R., & Keating, P. A. (1986). On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010598
90.
Wright, R. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically-based phonology (pp. 34–57). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.002
91.
Zlatin, M. A. (1974). Voicing contrast: Perceptual and productive voice onset time characteristics of adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56(3), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1903359
[PubMed]
You do not currently have access to this content.