Abstract
Background/Aims: In French, the size of a focus constituent is not reliably marked through pitch accent assignment as in many stress accent languages. While it has been argued that the distribution of lower-level prosodic boundaries plays a role, this is at best a weak cue to focus, leaving open the question of whether other marking strategies are available. In this study, we assess whether the right edge of a contrastive focus constituent is marked by differences in prosodic boundary strength. Methods: We elicited utterances with target words in six combinations of focus and syntactic contexts using an interactive production task. Results: The results show that if a given location is realized as an accentual phrase boundary in an all-focus context, then it is realized as an intermediate phrase boundary when it coincides with the right edge of a narrow-focus constituent. A location that is an intermediate phrase boundary in an all-focus context, however, remains unchanged under narrow focus. Conclusion: These findings suggest that focus constituents are constrained to align with a minimum prosodic domain size in French (i.e., the intermediate phrase), and that French does not rely on a general strategy of prosodic enhancement for marking focus.
References
1.
Astésano
, C.
, Bard
, E. G.
, & Turk
, A.
(2007
). Structural influences on initial accent placement in French.
Language and Speech
, 50
(Pt 3
), 423
–446
.
[PubMed]
0023-83092.
Avanzi
M
(2011
): L'interface prosodie/syntaxe en français: Dislocations, incises et asyndètes. Doctoral thesis, Paris 10.3.
Beyssade
C
, Hemforth
B
, Marandin
J-M
, Portes
C
(2009
): Prosodic marking of information focus in French; in Yoo H-Y, Delais-Roussarie E (eds): Actes de Interfaces Discours et Prosodie 2009. Paris, Université Paris 7, pp 109-122.4.
Beyssade
, C.
, Hemforth
, B.
, Marandin
, J.-M.
, & Portes
, C.
(2015
). Prosodic Realizations of Information Focus in French. In L.
Frazier
& T.
Gibson
(Eds.), Explicit and Implicit Prosody in Sentence Processing
(pp. 39
–61
). Heidelberg
: Springer International Publishing
. 5.
Boersma
P
, Weenink
D
(2015
): Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Computer program). Version 5.4. 01, retrieved from http://www.praat.org/6.
Bolinger
, D. L.
(1961
). Contrastive accent and contrastive stress.
Language
, 37
(1
), 83
–96
. 0097-85077.
8.
Chafe
, W. L.
(1974
). Language and consciousness.
Language
, 50
(1
), 111
–133
. 0097-85079.
Chen
, A.
, & Destruel
, E.
(2010
). Intonational encoding of focus in Toulousian French.
Speech Prosody
, 2010
(100233
), 1
–4
.10.
Clech-Darbon
, A.
, Rebuschi
, G.
, & Rialland
, A.
(1999
). Are there cleft sentences in French. In L.
Tuller
& G.
Rebuschi
(Eds.), The Grammar of Focus
(pp. 83
–118
). Amsterdam
: Benjamins
. 11.
12.
Delais-Roussarie
, E.
(1996
). Phonological Phrasing and Accentuation in French. In M.
Nespor
& N.
Smith
(Eds.), Dam Phonology: HIL Phonology Paper II
(pp. 83
–118
). Den Haag
: Holland Academic Graphics
.13.
Delais-Roussarie
, E.
, Post
, B.
, Avanzi
, M.
, Buthke
, C.
, Di Cristo
, A.
, Feldhausen
, I.
, et alYoo
, H.-Y.
(2015
). Intonational phonology of French: developing a ToBI system for French. In S.
Frota
& P.
Prieto
(Eds.), Intonation in Romance
(pp. 63
–100
). Oxford
: Oxford University Press
. 14.
Delais-Roussarie
E
, Post
B
(2008
): Unités prosodiques et grammaire de l’intonation : vers une nouvelle approche. In Actes des XXVIIème Journées d'Études sur la Parole JEP-TALN 8.15.
Delais-Roussarie
E
(2005
): Vers une grammaire prosodique formelle: le cas des incidentes en français. In Actes Electroniques de la Conférence Interface Discours et Prosodie, vol. 5, pp 66-205.16.
Di Cristo
, A.
(1996
). Intonation in French. In D.
Hirst
& A.
Di Cristo
(Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages
(pp. 195
–218
). Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
.17.
Di Cristo
A
, Hirst
D
(1993
): Rythme syllabique, rythme mélodique et représentation hiérarchique de la prosodie du français. In Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix-en-Provence 15, pp 9-24.18.
D’Imperio
, M.
, German
, J. S.
, & Michelas
, A.
(2012
). A multi-level approach to focus, phrasing and intonation in French. In G.
Elordieta
& P.
Prieto
(Eds.), Prosody and Meaning
(pp. 11
–34
). Berlin
: Mouton de Gruyter
. 19.
D’Imperio
, M.
, & Michelas
, A.
(2014
). Scaling and the internal structuring of the intonation phrase in French.
Phonology
, 31
(1
), 95
–122
. 0952-675720.
Dohen
M
, Loevenbruck
H
(2004
): Pre-focal rephrasing, focal enhancement and post-focal deaccentuation in French
; in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing
, pp 785
-788
.21.
Féry
, C.
(2001
). Intonation of focus in French. In C.
Féry
& W.
Sternefeld
(Eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientes: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow
(pp. 153
–181
). Berlin
: Akademi Verlag
.22.
Fougeron
, C.
, & Jun
, S.-A.
(1998
). Rate effects on French intonation: Prosodic organization and phonetic realization.
Journal of Phonetics
, 26
(1
), 45
–69
. 0095-447023.
German
JS
, D'Imperio
M
(2010
): Focus, phrase length, and the distribution of phrase-initial rises in French; in Speech Prosody 2010, 100207, pp 1-424.
German
, J. S.
, & D’Imperio
, M.
(2016
). The status of the initial rise as a marker of focus in French.
Language and Speech
, 59
(Pt 2
), 165
–195
.
[PubMed]
0023-830925.
German
, J. S.
, Sagi
, E.
, Clark
, B.
, & Kaufmann
, S.
(2011
). The role of speaker beliefs in determining accent placement. In A.
Benz
, C.
Ebert
, & R.
van Rooij
(Eds.), Language, games, and evolution
(pp. 92
–116
). Berlin
: Springer
. 26.
Goldman
J-P
(2011
): Easy Align: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat; in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Red Hook, NY, Curran Associates, pp 3240-3243.27.
Gussenhoven
, C.
(2004
). The phonology of tone and intonation
. Cambridge
: Cambridge University Press
. 28.
Halliday
, M. A. K.
(1967
). Notes on transitivity and theme in English.
Journal of Linguistics
, 3
(02
), 199
–244
. 0022-226729.
Hastie
, T.
, Tibshirani
, R.
, & Friedman
, J.
(2009
). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
(2nd ed.). Berlin
: Springer Verlag
. 30.
Hothorn
, T.
, Bretz
, F.
, & Westfall
, P.
(2008
). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.
Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
, 50
(3
), 346
–363
.
[PubMed]
0323-384731.
Jun
, S.-A.
, & Fougeron
, C.
(2000
). A phonological model of French intonation. In A.
Botinis
(Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology
(pp. 209
–242
). Boston
: Kluwer Academic
. 32.
Jun
, S.-A.
, & Fougeron
, C.
(2002
). Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation.
Probus
, 14
(1
), 147
–172
. 0921-477133.
Kenesei
, I.
(1986
). On the Logic of Word Order in Hungarian. In A.
Werner
& S.
de Meij
(Eds.), Topic, Focus, and Configurationality
(pp. 143
–159
). Amsterdam
: John Benjamins
. 34.
Krifka
, M.
(1992
). A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions. In J.
Jacobs
(Ed.), Informations struktur und Grammatik
(pp. 17
–53
). Opladen
: Westdeutscher Verlag
. 35.
Kuznetsova
, A.
, Brockhoff
, P. B.
, & Christensen
, R. H. B.
(2017
). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
Journal of Statistical Software
, 82
(13
), 1
–26
. 1548-766036.
Martin
, P.
(2009
). Intonation du français, mesures, théories, modèles
. Paris
: Armand Colin
.37.
McCarthy
, J.
, & Prince
, A.
(1993
). Generalized alignment
. Netherlands
: Springer
. 38.
Michelas
A
(2011
): Caractérisation phonétique et phonologique du syntagme intermédiaire en français: de la production à la perception.
Doctoral thesis, Université de Provence-Aix-Marseille I.39.
Michelas
, A.
, Champagne-Lavau
, M.
(2018
). Does the addressee matter when producing French prosodic focus marking?
Workshop on Prosody and Meaning: Information Structure and Beyond
, Nov 2018
, Aix-en-Provence, France
.40.
Michelas
, A.
, & D’Imperio
, M.
(2012
). When syntax meets prosody: Tonal and duration variability in French accentual phrases.
Journal of Phonetics
, 40
(6
), 816
–829
. 0095-447041.
Michelas
, A.
, & D’Imperio
, M.
(2015
). Prosodic boundary strength guides syntactic parsing of French utterances.
Laboratory Phonology
, 6
(1
), 119
–146
. 1868-634642.
Michelas
, A.
, Faget
, C.
, Portes
, C.
, Lienhart
, A.-S.
, Boyer
, L.
, Lançon
, C.
, & Champagne-Lavau
, M.
(2014
). Do patients with schizophrenia use prosody to encode contrastive discourse status?
Frontiers in Psychology
, 5
, 755
.
[PubMed]
1664-107843.
Pierrehumbert
JB
(1980
): The phonology and phonetics of English intonation.
PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.44.
Pierrehumbert
, J. B.
, & Hirschberg
, J.
(1990
). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P.
Cohen
, J.
Morgan
, & M.
Pollack
(Eds.), Intentions in communication
(pp. 342
–365
). Cambridge
: MIT Press
.45.
Post
, B.
(2000
). Tonal and Phrasal Structures in French Intonation
. The Hague
: Holland Academic Graphics
.46.
Price
, P. J.
, Ostendorf
, M.
, Shattuck-Hufnagel
, S.
, & Fong
, C.
(1991
). The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, 90
(6
), 2956
–2970
.
[PubMed]
0001-496647.
R Core Team
(2017
): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/48.
Rialland
, A.
, & Robert
, S.
(2001
). The Intonational System of Wolof.
Linguistics
, 39
(5
), 893
–940
. 0024-394949.
Rooth
M
(1985
): Associations with Focus.
PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.50.
Rooth
, M.
(1992
). A theory of focus interpretation.
Natural Language Semantics
, 1
(1
), 75
–116
. 0925-854X51.
Rossi
, M.
(1985
). L’intonation et l’organisation de l’énoncé.
Phonetica
, 42
(2-3
), 135
–153
.
[PubMed]
0031-838852.
Selkirk
, E. O.
(1986
). Phonology and syntax: the relationship between sound and structure
. Cambridge
: MIT press
.53.
Selkirk
, E. O.
(1995
). The prosodic structure of function words. In J.
Beckman
, L.
Walsh-Dickey
, & S.
Urbanczyk
(Eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory
(pp. 439
–470
). GLSA Publications
.54.
Smith
, C. L.
(2002
). Prosodic finality and sentence type in French.
Language and Speech
, 45
(Pt 2
), 141
–178
.
[PubMed]
0023-830955.
Streeter
, L. A.
(1978
). Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, 64
(6
), 1582
–1592
.
[PubMed]
0001-496656.
Touati
, P.
(1987
). Structures Prosodiques du Suédois et du Français
. Lund
: Lund University Press
.57.
Welby
, P.
(2006
). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment.
Journal of Phonetics
, 34
(3
), 343
–371
. 0095-4470© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
