Background/Aims: Lexically guided perceptual learning in speech is the updating of linguistic categories based on novel input disambiguated by the structure provided in a recognized lexical item. We test the range of variation that allows for perceptual learning by presenting listeners with items that vary from subtle within-category variation to fully remapped cross-category variation. Methods: Experiment 1 uses a lexically guided perceptual learning paradigm with words containing noncanonical /s/ realizations from s/ʃ continua that correspond to “typical,” “ambiguous,” “atypical,” and “remapped” steps. Perceptual learning is tested in an s/ʃ categorization task. Experiment 2 addresses listener sensitivity to variation in the exposure items using AX discrimination tasks. Results: Listeners in experiment 1 showed perceptual learning with the maximally ambiguous tokens. Performance of listeners in experiment 2 suggests that tokens which showed the most perceptual learning were not perceptually salient on their own. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that perceptual learning is enhanced with maximally ambiguous stimuli. Excessively atypical pronunciations show attenuated perceptual learning, while typical pronunciations show no evidence for perceptual learning. AX discrimination illustrates that the maximally ambiguous stimuli are not perceptually unique. Together, these results suggest that perceptual learning relies on an interplay between confidence in phonetic and lexical predictions and category typicality.

1.
Allen
,
J S
, &
Miller
,
J L
(
2004
):
Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115(6: 3171-3183.
2.
Baese-Berk
,
M. M.
,
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, &
Wright
,
B. A.
(
2013
).
Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
133
(
3
),
EL174
EL180
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
3.
Bates
,
D.
,
Maechler
,
M.
,
Bolker
,
B.
, &
Walker
,
S.
(
2015
).
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.
Journal of Statistical Software
,
67
(
1
),
1
48
. 1548-7660
4.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, &
Alexander
,
J. A.
(
2007
).
Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
121
(
4
),
2339
2349
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
5.
Bradlow
,
A. R.
, &
Bent
,
T.
(
2008
).
Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.
Cognition
,
106
(
2
),
707
729
.
[PubMed]
0010-0277
6.
Clark
,
A.
(
2013
).
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
,
36
(
3
),
181
204
.
[PubMed]
0140-525X
7.
Clarke
,
C. M.
, &
Garrett
,
M. F.
(
2004
).
Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
116
(
6
),
3647
3658
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
8.
Clarke-Davidson
,
C. M.
,
Luce
,
P. A.
, &
Sawusch
,
J. R.
(
2008
).
Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias?
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
,
70
(
4
),
604
618
.
[PubMed]
1943-3921
9.
Cooper
,
A.
, &
Bradlow
,
A. R.
(
2016
).
Linguistically guided adaptation to foreign-accented speech.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
140
(
5
),
EL378
EL384
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
10.
Cutler
,
A.
(
2012
).
Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words
.
Cambridge
:
MIT Press
.
11.
Cutler
,
A.
,
Mehler
,
J.
,
Norris
,
D.
, &
Segui
,
J.
(
1987
).
Phoneme identification and the lexicon.
Cognitive Psychology
,
19
(
2
),
141
177
. 0010-0285
12.
Ganong
,
W. F.
, III
. (
1980
).
Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
,
6
(
1
),
110
125
.
[PubMed]
0096-1523
13.
Hay
,
J. B.
,
Pierrehumbert
,
J. B.
,
Walker
,
A. J.
, &
LaShell
,
P.
(
2015
).
Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change.
Cognition
,
139
,
83
91
.
[PubMed]
0010-0277
14.
Holt
,
R. F.
, &
Bent
,
T.
(
2017
).
Children’s use of semantic context in perception of foreign-accented speech.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR
,
60
(
1
),
223
230
.
[PubMed]
1092-4388
15.
Jesse
,
A.
, &
McQueen
,
J. M.
(
2011
).
Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
,
18
(
5
),
943
950
.
[PubMed]
1069-9384
16.
Kawahara
,
H
,
Morise
,
M
,
Takahashi
,
T
,
Nisimura
,
R
,
Irino
,
T
, &
Banno
,
H
(
2008
, March): TANDEM-STRAIGHT: A temporally stable power spectral representation for periodic signals and applications to interference-free spectrum, F0, and aperiodicity estimation. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP. IEEE International Conference 3933-3936).
17.
Kleinschmidt
,
D. F.
, &
Jaeger
,
T. F.
(
2015
).
Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.
Psychological Review
,
122
(
2
),
148
203
.
[PubMed]
0033-295X
18.
Knoblauch, K. (2014). psyphy: Functions for analyzing psychophysical data in R. R package version 0.1-9. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psyphy
19.
Kraljic
,
T.
, &
Samuel
,
A. G.
(
2005
).
Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?
Cognitive Psychology
,
51
(
2
),
141
178
.
[PubMed]
0010-0285
20.
Kraljic
,
T.
, &
Samuel
,
A. G.
(
2006
).
Generalization in perceptual learning for speech.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
,
13
(
2
),
262
268
.
[PubMed]
1069-9384
21.
Kraljic
,
T.
, &
Samuel
,
A. G.
(
2007
).
Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers.
Journal of Memory and Language
,
56
(
1
),
1
15
. 0749-596X
22.
Kraljic
,
T.
,
Brennan
,
S. E.
, &
Samuel
,
A. G.
(
2008
a).
Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing.
Cognition
,
107
(
1
),
54
81
.
[PubMed]
0010-0277
23.
Kraljic
,
T.
,
Samuel
,
A. G.
, &
Brennan
,
S. E.
(
2008
b).
First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability.
Psychological Science
,
19
(
4
),
332
338
.
[PubMed]
0956-7976
24.
Kuperberg
,
G. R.
, &
Jaeger
,
T. F.
(
2016
).
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
,
31
(
1
),
32
59
.
[PubMed]
2327-3798
25.
Lenth
,
R.
(
2016
).
Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans.
Journal of Statistical Software
,
69
(
1
),
1
33
. 1548-7660
26.
Liberman
,
A. M.
,
Harris
,
K. S.
,
Hoffman
,
H. S.
, &
Griffith
,
B. C.
(
1957
).
The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.
Journal of Experimental Psychology
,
54
(
5
),
358
368
.
[PubMed]
0022-1015
27.
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Psychology Press.
28.
Maye
,
J.
,
Aslin
,
R. N.
, &
Tanenhaus
,
M. K.
(
2008
).
The weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent.
Cognitive Science
,
32
(
3
),
543
562
.
[PubMed]
0364-0213
29.
McAuliffe
,
M
(
2015
): Attention and salience in lexically-guided perceptual learning (University of British Columbia Doctoral Dissertation). cIRcle: UBC’s Digital Repository: Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 2008+. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/54152
30.
McAuliffe
,
M.
, &
Babel
,
M.
(
2016
).
Stimulus-directed attention attenuates lexically-guided perceptual learning.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
140
(
3
),
1727
1738
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
31.
McClelland
,
J. L.
, &
Elman
,
J. L.
(
1986
).
The TRACE model of speech perception.
Cognitive Psychology
,
18
(
1
),
1
86
.
[PubMed]
0010-0285
32.
McClelland
,
J. L.
,
Mirman
,
D.
, &
Holt
,
L. L.
(
2006
).
Are there interactive processes in speech perception?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
,
10
(
8
),
363
369
.
[PubMed]
1364-6613
33.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299–325. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003241
34.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, &
Cutler
,
A.
(
2003
).
Perceptual learning in speech.
Cognitive Psychology
,
47
(
2
),
204
238
.
[PubMed]
0010-0285
35.
Norris
,
D.
,
McQueen
,
J. M.
, &
Cutler
,
A.
(
2016
).
Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
,
31
(
1
),
4
18
.
[PubMed]
2327-3798
36.
Pisoni
,
D. B.
, &
Tash
,
J.
(
1974
).
Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
,
15
(
2
),
285
290
.
[PubMed]
1943-3921
37.
Pitt
,
M. A.
, &
Samuel
,
A. G.
(
1993
).
An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
,
19
(
4
),
699
725
.
[PubMed]
0096-1523
38.
Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
(
2012
): E-Prime 2.0 [computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com
39.
R Core Team
(
2017
): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
40.
Reinisch
,
E.
,
Weber
,
A.
, &
Mitterer
,
H.
(
2013
).
Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
,
39
(
1
),
75
86
.
[PubMed]
0096-1523
41.
Reinisch
,
E.
,
Wozny
,
D. R.
,
Mitterer
,
H.
, &
Holt
,
L. L.
(
2014
).
Phonetic category recalibration: What are the categories?
Journal of Phonetics
,
45
,
91
105
.
[PubMed]
0095-4470
42.
Scharenborg
,
O.
, &
Janse
,
E.
(
2013
).
Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
,
75
(
3
),
525
536
.
[PubMed]
1943-3921
43.
Scharenborg
,
O.
,
Weber
,
A.
, &
Janse
,
E.
(
2015
).
The role of attentional abilities in lexically guided perceptual learning by older listeners.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
,
77
(
2
),
493
507
.
[PubMed]
1943-3921
44.
Sohoglu
,
E.
, &
Davis
,
M. H.
(
2016
).
Perceptual learning of degraded speech by minimizing prediction error.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
,
113
(
12
),
E1747
E1756
.
[PubMed]
0027-8424
45.
Sóskuthy
,
M.
(
2015
).
Understanding change through stability: A computational study of sound change actuation.
Lingua
,
163
,
40
60
. 0024-3841
46.
Sumner
,
M.
(
2011
).
The role of variation in the perception of accented speech.
Cognition
,
119
(
1
),
131
136
.
[PubMed]
0010-0277
47.
Theodore
,
R. M.
,
Myers
,
E. B.
, &
Lomibao
,
J. A.
(
2015
).
Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
,
138
(
2
),
1068
1078
.
[PubMed]
0001-4966
48.
Vaughn
,
C.
, &
Kendall
,
T.
(
2018
).
Listener sensitivity to probabilistic conditioning of sociolinguistic variables: The case of (ING).
Journal of Memory and Language
,
103
,
58
73
. 0749-596X
49.
Vroomen
,
J.
,
van Linden
,
S.
,
Keetels
,
M.
,
De Gelder
,
B.
, &
Bertelson
,
P.
(
2004
).
Selective adaptation and recalibration of auditory speech by lipread information: Dissipation.
Speech Communication
,
44
(
1
),
55
61
. 0167-6393
50.
Warren
,
R. M.
(
1970
).
Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.
Science
,
167
(
3917
),
392
393
.
[PubMed]
0036-8075
51.
Weatherholtz
,
K
(
2015
): Perceptual learning of systemic cross-category vowel variation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
52.
Wedel
,
A.
(
2012
).
Lexical contrast maintenance and the organization of sublexical contrast systems.
Language and Cognition
,
4
(
4
),
319
355
. 1866-9808
53.
Witteman
,
M. J.
,
Weber
,
A.
, &
McQueen
,
J. M.
(
2013
).
Foreign accent strength and listener familiarity with an accent codetermine speed of perceptual adaptation.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
,
75
(
3
),
537
556
.
[PubMed]
1943-3921
54.
Xie
,
X.
,
Theodore
,
R. M.
, &
Myers
,
E. B.
(
2017
).
More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories.
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
,
43
(
1
),
206
217
.
[PubMed]
0096-1523
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.