Skip to Main Content
S. Karger AG
header search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip Nav Destination

Comprehension and Data-Sharing Behavior of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Test Customers

Public Health Genomics (2016) 19 (2): 116–124.
This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.
Should Commercial Diagnostic Testing Be Stimulated or Discouraged? Analyzing Willingness-to-Pay and Market Externalities of Three Commercial Diagnostic Tests in The Netherlands
  • Niek Stadhouders
  • Ella van Vliet
  • Anne E.M. Brabers
  • Wieteke van Dijk
  • Suzanne Onstwedder
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy (2024) 22 (2): 193.
The Landscape of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in Reproductive Health Contexts: An Analytical Framework of Stakeholders and Their Competing Motivations
  • Elaine Hsieh
  • Brittney S. Morrissey
  • Isabella A. Chiareli
Health Communication (2024) 39 (13): 3211.
Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework
  • Alexandra Cernat
  • Naazish S. Bashir
  • Wendy J. Ungar
Journal of Community Genetics (2022) 13 (2): 155.
May direct-to-consumer genetic testing have an impact on general practitioners’ daily practice? a cross-sectional study of patients’ intentions towards this approach
  • Christine Cohidon
  • Regula Cardinaux
  • Jacques Cornuz
  • Robin Chenal
  • Béatrice Desvergne
  • Idris Guessous
  • Daniela Cerqui
  • Daniel Widmer
BMC Family Practice (2021) 22 (1)
Impact of Previous Genetic Counseling and Objective Numeracy on Accurate Interpretation of a Pharmacogenetics Test Report
  • Kelly Drelles
  • Robert Pilarski
  • Kandamurugu Manickam
  • Abigail B. Shoben
  • Amanda Ewart Toland
Public Health Genomics (2021) 24 (1-2): 26.
Strategies to Improve the Clinical Outcomes for Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenomic Tests
  • Alireza Tafazoli
  • Rama Krishna Guggilla
  • Zahra Kamel-Koleti
  • Wojciech Miltyk
Genes (2021) 12 (3): 361.
Do genetic ancestry tests increase racial essentialism? Findings from a randomized controlled trial
  • Wendy D. Roth
  • Şule Yaylacı
  • Kaitlyn Jaffe
  • Lindsey Richardson
  • Mellissa H. Withers
PLOS ONE (2020) 15 (1): e0227399.
Knowledge and understanding of pharmacogenomic testing among patients and health care professionals: A scoping review
  • Sophie Veilleux
  • Maud Bouffard
Patient Education and Counseling (2019) 102 (11): 2001.
Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals
  • Scott P. McGrath
  • Nephi Walton
  • Marc S. Williams
  • Katherine K. Kim
  • Kiran Bastola
BMC Health Services Research (2019) 19 (1)
Reconciling Opportunistic and Population Screening in Clinical Genomics
  • Kyle B. Brothers
  • Jason L. Vassy
  • Robert C. Green
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2019) 94 (1): 103.
Estimating the effects of consumer characteristics on the intention to use direct-to-consumer genetic testing
  • Gicheol Jeong
Health Policy and Technology (2018) 7 (3): 233.
The impact of raw DNA availability and corresponding online interpretation services: A mixed-methods study
  • Caitlin G Allen
  • Jazmine Gabriel
  • Maureen Flynn
  • Tricia N Cunningham
  • Catharine Wang
Translational Behavioral Medicine (2018) 8 (1): 105.
Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Kelly F. J. Stewart
  • Anke Wesselius
  • Maartje A. C. Schreurs
  • Annemie M. W. J. Schols
  • Maurice P. Zeegers
Journal of Community Genetics (2018) 9 (1): 1.
Trends and Gaps in Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests From 2007 to 2014
  • Nate C. Apathy
  • Terri Menser
  • Lindsay M. Keeran
  • Eric W. Ford
  • Christopher A. Harle
  • Timothy R. Huerta
American Journal of Preventive Medicine (2018) 54 (6): 806.
Stages of behavioural change after direct-to-consumer disease risk profiling: study protocol of two integrated controlled pragmatic trials
  • Kelly F. J. Stewart
  • Anke Wesselius
  • Annemie M. W. J. Schols
  • Maurice P. Zeegers
Trials (2018) 19 (1)
The dawn of consumer‐directed testing
  • Erica Ramos
  • Scott M. Weissman
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics (2018) 178 (1): 89.
Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Where and How Does Genetic Counseling Fit?
  • Anna Middleton
  • Álvaro Mendes
  • Caroline M Benjamin
  • Heidi Carmen Howard
Personalized Medicine (2017) 14 (3): 249.
Transparency of genetic testing services for ‘health, wellness and lifestyle’: analysis of online prepurchase information for UK consumers
  • Jacqueline A Hall
  • Rena Gertz
  • Joan Amato
  • Claudia Pagliari
European Journal of Human Genetics (2017) 25 (8): 908.
Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?
  • Tobias Haeusermann
  • Bastian Greshake
  • Alessandro Blasimme
  • Darja Irdam
  • Martin Richards
  • Effy Vayena
  • Kai Wang
PLOS ONE (2017) 12 (5): e0177158.
Does personalized melanoma genomic risk information trigger conversations about skin cancer prevention and skin examination with family, friends and health professionals?
  • A.K. Smit
  • L.A. Keogh
  • A.J. Newson
  • P.N. Butow
  • K. Dunlop
  • R.L. Morton
  • J. Kirk
  • D. Espinoza
  • A.E. Cust
British Journal of Dermatology (2017) 177 (3): 779.
  • Online ISSN 1662-8063
  • Print ISSN 1662-4246
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal