Background/Aims: Personalised nutrition has potential to revolutionise dietary health promotion if accepted by the general public. We studied trust and preferences regarding personalised nutrition services, how they influence intention to adopt these services, and cultural and social differences therein. Methods: A total of 9,381 participants were quota-sampled to be representative of each of 9 EU countries (Germany, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, the UK, and Norway) and surveyed by a questionnaire assessing their intention to adopt personalised nutrition, trust in service regulators and information sources, and preferences for service providers and information channels. Results: Trust and preferences significantly predicted intention to adopt personalised nutrition. Higher trust in the local department of health care was associated with lower intention to adopt personalised nutrition. General practitioners were the most trusted of service regulators, except in Portugal, where consumer organisations and universities were most trusted. In all countries, family doctors were the most trusted information providers. Trust in the National Health Service as service regulator and information source showed high variability across countries. Despite its highest variability across countries, personal meeting was the preferred communication channel, except in Spain, where an automated internet service was preferred. General practitioners were the preferred service providers, except in Poland, where dietitians and nutritionists were preferred. The preference for dietitians and nutritionists as service providers highly varied across countries. Conclusion: These results may assist in informing local initiatives to encourage acceptance and adoption of country-specific tailored personalised nutrition services, therefore benefiting individual and public health.

1.
Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Forster H, O'Donovan CB, Woolhead C, et al: Design and baseline characteristics of the Food4me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr 2015;10:450.
2.
Ferguson L, Bishop K, Karunsinghe N: Impact of personalized nutrition on public health; in Ghosh D, Bagchi D, Konishi T (eds): Clinical Aspects of Functional Foods Nutraceuticals. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2014, p 371.
3.
Boland M: Innovation in the food industry. Personalised nutrition and mass customisation. Innov Organ Manag 2008;10:53-60.
4.
Casper J: Epigenetics, Nutrigenomics, and Genetic Testing. 2016. http://nutritionalbalancing.org/center/htma/science/articles/epigenetics.php.
5.
Fenech M: Nutrigenomics and Nutrigenetics: the new paradigm for optimising health and preventing disease. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 2015;61(suppl):S209.
6.
Horne J, Madill J, O'Connor C: Nutrigenomics: an evident need for education in the field of dietetics. Can J Diet Pract Res 2015;76:pe9.
7.
Madden J, Williams CM, Calder PC, Lietz G, Miles EA, Cordell H, Mathers JC, Minihane AM: The impact of common gene variants on the response of biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk to increased fish oil fatty acids intakes. Ann Rev Nutr 2011;31:203-234.
8.
Ouhtit A: Nutrigenomics: from promise to practice. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2014;14:e1-e3.
9.
Vergères G: Nutrigenomics - linking food to human metabolism. Trends Food Sci Technol 2013;31:6-12.
10.
Abrahams M, Frewer L, Stewart-Knox B: Factors determining the integration of nutritional genomics into clinical practice by registered dietitians. Trends Food Sci Technol 2017;59:139-147.
11.
Rankin A, Kuznesof S, Frewer LJ, Orr K, Davison J, de Almeida MD, Stewart-Knox B: Public perceptions of personalised nutrition through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory. J Health Psychol 2017;22:1233-1242.
12.
Ronteltap A, van Trijp H, Berezowska A, Goossens J: Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model? Genes Nutr 2013;8:153-163.
13.
Fallaize R, Macready AL, Butler LT, Ellis JA, Lovegrove JA: An insight into the public acceptance of nutrigenomic-based personalised nutrition. Nutr Res Rev 2013;26:39-48.
14.
Stewart-Knox B, Kuznesof S, Robinson J, Rankin A, Orr K, Duffy M, Poínhos R, de Almeida MDV, Macready A, Gallagher C, Berezowska A, Fischer ARH, Navas-Carretero S, Riemer M, Traczyk I, Gjelstad IMF, Mavrogianni C, Frewer LJ: Factors influencing European consumer uptake of personalised nutrition. Results of a qualitative analysis. Appetite 2013;66:67-74.
15.
Stewart-Knox BJ, Bunting BP, Gilpin S, Parr HJ, Pinhão S, Strain JJ, de Almeida MD, Gibney M: Attitudes toward genetic testing and personalised nutrition in a representative sample of European consumers. Br J Nutr 2009;101:982-989.
16.
Berezowska A, Fischer ARH, Ronteltap A, Kuznesof S, Macready A, Fallaize R, van Trijp HCM: Understanding consumer evaluations of personalised nutrition services in terms of the privacy calculus: a qualitative study. Public Health Genomics 2014;17:127-140.
17.
Poínhos R, van der Lans IA, Rankin A, Fischer ARH, Bunting B, Kuznesof S, Stewart-Knox B, Frewer L: Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries: the importance of perceived benefit. PLos One 2014;9:e110614.
18.
Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ: Consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalised nutrition. Br J Nutr 2009;101:132-144.
19.
Giles EL, Kuznesof S, Clark B, Hubbard C, Frewer LJ: Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review. J Nanopart Res 2015;17:1-26.
20.
Roosen J, Bieberstein A, Blanchemanche S, Goddard E, Marette S, Vandermoere F: Trust and willingness to pay for nanotechnology food. Food Policy 2015;52:75-83.
21.
Berezowska A, Fischer AR, Ronteltap A, van der Lans IA, van Trijp HC: Consumer adoption of personalised nutrition services from the perspective of a risk-benefit trade-off. Genes Nutr 2015;10:42.
22.
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G: Perception of hazards. The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Anal 2000;20:713-719.
23.
Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G, Roth C: Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Anal 2000;20:353-362.
24.
Popa ME, Popa A: Consumer behavior: determinants and trends in novel food choice; in McElhatton A, Sobral PJA (eds): Novel Technologies in Food Science. New York, Springer, 2012, pp 137-156.
25.
Frewer LJ, Bergmann B, Brennan M, Lion R, Meertens R, Rowe G, Siegrist M, Vereijken C: Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies. Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends Food Sci Technol 2011;22:442-456.
26.
Costa-Font M, Gil JM: Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: a cross country study. Food Qual Prefer 2009;20:399-409.
27.
Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF: Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Anal 2003;23:961-972.
28.
Nocella G, Romano D, Stefani G: Consumers' attitudes, trust and willingness to pay for food information. Int J Consum Stud 2014;38:153-165.
29.
Fallaize R, Macready AL, Butler LT, Ellis JA, Berezowska A, Fischer ARH, Walsh M, Gallagher C, Stewart-Knox BJ, Kuznesof S, Frewer L, Gibney M, Lovegrove JA: The perceived impact of the National Health Service on personalised nutrition service delivery among the UK public. Br J Nutr 2015;8:1271-1279.
30.
Xiao N, Sharman R, Rao HR, Upadhyaya S: Factors influencing online health information search: an empirical analysis of a national cancer-related survey. Decis Support Syst 2014;57:417-427.
31.
Rutsaert P, Regan A, Pieniak Z, McConnon A, Moss A, Wall P, Verbeke W: The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Trends Food Sci Technol 2013;30: 84-91.
32.
van Kleef E, Frewer LJ, Chryssochoidis GM, Houghton JR, Korzen-Bohr S, Krystallis T, Lassen J, Pfenning U, Rowe G: Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: results from a cross-European study. Appetite 2006;47:46-63.
33.
Pieniak Z, Verbeke W, Scholdered J, Brunso K, Olsen SO: European consumers' use and trust in information sources about fish. Food Qual Pref 2007;18:1050-1063.
34.
Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211.
35.
Melnyk V, van Herpen E, Fischer AR, van Trijp H: To think or not to think: the effect of cognitive deliberation on the influence of injunctive versus descriptive social norms. Psychol Market 2011;28:709-729.
36.
Oliver RL, Rust RT, Varki S: Customer delight: foundations, findings, and managerial insight. J Retailing 1997;73:311-336.
37.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
38.
Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992;112:155-159.
39.
Divajeval D, Marsh T, Logstrup S, Kestens M, Vemer P, Kriaucioniene V, Peresson S, O'Kelly S, Rito A, Webber L: Economics of chronic diseases protocol: cost-effectiveness modeling and the future burden of non-communicable disease in Europe. BMC Public Health 2014;14:456.
41.
Houghton JR, van Kleef E, Rowe G, Frewer LJ: Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of food risk management practices: a cross-cultural study. Health Risk Soc 2006;8:165-183.
42.
Stewart-Knox B, Rankin A, Kuznesof S, Poínhos R, de Almeida MDV, Fischer A, Frewer L: Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull? Proc Nutr Soc 2015;74:171-176.
43.
Eiser JR, Miles S, Frewer LJ: Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002;32:2423-2433.
44.
de Bakker E, Dagevos H: Reducing meat consumption in today's consumer society: questioning the citizen-consumer gap. J Agr Envir Ethics 2012;25:877-894.
45.
Fischer ARH, Berezowska A, van der Lans IA, Ronteltap A, Rankin A, Kuznesof S, Poínhos R, Stewart-Knox B, Frewer LJ: Willingness to pay for personalised nutrition across Europe. Eur J Public Health 2016;26:640-644.
46.
Wendel S, Dellaert BGC, Rosentalp A, van Trijp HCM: Consumers' intention to use health recommendation systems to receive personalised nutrition advice. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:126.
47.
Pavlidis C, Karamitri A, Barakou A, Cooper DN, Poulas K, Topouzis S, Patrinos GP: Ascertainment and critical assessment of the views of the general public and healthcare professional on nutrigenomics in Greece. Pers Med 2012;9:201-210.
48.
Su H-L, Lu T-J: Exploring the consumer acceptance of and preferences in nutrigenomics-based personalized health management service. PIMTEC 2012;3050-3058.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.