Background: Due to disparities in the use of genetic services, there has been growing interest in examining beliefs and attitudes related to genetic testing for breast and/or ovarian cancer risk among women of African descent. However, to date, few studies have addressed critical cultural variations among this minority group and their influence on such beliefs and attitudes. Methods: We assessed ethnic, racial and cultural identity and examined their relationships with perceived benefits and barriers related to genetic testing for cancer risk in a sample of 160 women of African descent (49% self-identified African American, 39% Black-West Indian/Caribbean, 12% Black-Other) who met genetic risk criteria and were participating in a larger longitudinal study including the opportunity for free genetic counseling and testing in New York City. All participants completed the following previously validated measures: (a) the multi-group ethnic identity measure (including ethnic search and affirmation subscales) and other-group orientation for ethnic identity, (b) centrality to assess racial identity, and (c) Africentrism to measure cultural identity. Perceived benefits and barriers related to genetic testing included: (1) pros/advantages (including family-related pros), (2) cons/disadvantages (including family-related cons, stigma and confidentiality concerns), and (3) concerns about abuses of genetic testing. Results: In multivariate analyses, several ethnic identity elements showed significant, largely positive relationships to perceived benefits about genetic testing for breast and/or ovarian cancer risk, the exception being ethnic search, which was positively associated with cons/disadvantages, in general, and family-related cons/disadvantages. Racial identity (centrality) showed a significant association with confidentiality concerns. Cultural identity (Africentrism) was not related to perceived benefits and/or barriers. Conclusions: Ethnic and racial identity may influence perceived benefits and barriers related to genetic testing for breast and/or ovarian cancer risk among at-risk women of African descent. Genetic counseling services may want to take into account these factors in the creation of culturally-appropriate services which best meet the needs of this heterogenous population.

1.
Chen S, Parmigiani G: Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1329–1333.
2.
Kinney AY, Croyle RT, Dudley WN, Bailey CN, Pelias MK, Neuhausen SL: Knowledge, attitudes and interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: a survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Prev Med 2001;33:543–551.
3.
Hall MJ, Olopade OI: Confronting genetic testing disparities: knowledge is power. JAMA 2005;293:1783–1785.
4.
Hall MJ, Olopade OI: Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the BRCA box. J Clin Oncol 2005;24:2197–2203.
5.
Olopade OI: Genetics in clinical cancer care: a promise unfulfilled among minority populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1683–1686.
6.
Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M: Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA 2005;293:1729–1736.
7.
Matthews AK, Cummings S, Thompson S, Wohl V, List M, Olopade OI: Genetic testing of African Americans for susceptibility to inherited cancers: use of focus groups to determine factors contributing to participation. J Psychosoc Oncol 2000;18:1–19.
8.
Lerman C, Hughes C, Benkendorf JL, Biesecker B, Kerner J, Willison J, Eads N, Hadley D, Lynch J: Racial differences in testing motivation and psychological distress following pretest education for BRCA1 gene testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:361–367.
9.
Simon MS, Korczak JF, Yee CL, Malone KE, Ursin G, Bernstein L, McDonald JA, Deapen D, Strom BL, Press MF, Marchbanks PA, Burkman RT, Weiss IK, Schwartz AG: Breast cancer risk estimates for relatives of white and African American women with breast cancer in the Women’s Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2498–2504.
10.
Simon MS, Petrucelli N: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. The impact of race on uptake of genetic counseling and testing; in Verma M (ed): Methods in Molecular Biology, Cancer Epidemiology. New York, Springer, 2009, vol 471, pp 487–500.
11.
Donovan KA, Tucker DC: Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample. J Behav Med 2000;23:15–36.
12.
Peters N, Domchek SM, Rose A, Polis R, Stopfer J, Armstrong K: Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer. Genet Test2005;9:48–53.
13.
Hughes C, Gomez-Caminero A, Benkendorf J, Kerner J, Isaacs C, Barter J, et al: Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. Patient Educ Couns 1997;32:51–62.
14.
Thompson H, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C, Guevarra J, Bovbjerg DH, Richmond-Avellaneda C, Amarel D, Godfrey D, Brown K, Offit K: Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1579–1585.
15.
Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Jandorf L, Redd W: Perceived disadvantages and concerns about abuses of genetic testing for cancer risk: differences across African American, Latina and Caucasian women. Patient Educ Couns 2003;51:217–227.
16.
Bowman JE: Technical, genetic, and ethnical issues in screening and testing of African-Americans for hemochromatosis. Genet Test 2000;4:207–212.
17.
Telfair J, Nash NB: African American culture; in Fisher NL (ed): Cultural and Ethnic Diversity: A Guide for Genetics Professionals. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000, pp 37–59.
18.
Peters N, Rose A, Armstrong K: The association between race and attitudes about predictive genetic testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:361–365.
19.
Ford ME, Alford SH, Britton D, McClary B, Gordon HS: Factors influencing perceptions of breast cancer genetic counseling among women in an urban health care system. J Genet Couns 2007;16:735–753.
20.
Charles S, Kessler L, Stopfer JE, Domchek S, Halbert CH: Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:196–204.
21.
Baty BJ, Kinney AY, Ellis SM: Developing culturally sensitive cancer genetics communication aids for African Americans. Am J Med Genet A 2003;118A:146–155.
22.
Guidry JJ, Matthews-Juarez P, Copeland, VA: Barriers to breast cancer control for African-American women: the interdependence of culture and psychosocial issues. Cancer 2003;97(suppl 1):318–323.
23.
Kudadjie-Gyamfi E, Consedine NS, Magai C: On the importance of being ethnic: coping with the threat of prostate cancer in relation to prostate cancer screening. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2006;12:509–526.
24.
Magai C, Consedine NS, Conway F, Neugut A, Culver C: Diversity matters: unique populations of women and breast cancer screening. Cancer 2004;100:2300–2307.
25.
Consedine NS, Magai C, Krivoshekova YS, Ryzewicz L, Neugut AI: Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:501–510.
26.
Sussner KM, Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir H, Redd WH, Jandorf L: Acculturation and familiarity with attitudes toward and beliefs about genetic testing for cancer risk within Latinas in East Harlem, New York City. J Genet Couns 2009;18:60–71.
27.
Edwards TA, Thompson HS, Kwate NO, Brown K, McGovern MM, Forman A, Kapil-Pair N, Jandorf L, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB: Association between temporal orientation and attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing among women of African descent with family histories of breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2008;72:276–282.
28.
Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Winkel G, Jandorf L, Redd W: The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale: psychometric properties and association with breast cancer screening. Prev Med 2004;38:209–218.
29.
Hughes C, Fasaye GA, LaSalle VH, Finch C: Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2003;51:107–114.
30.
Wang VO: Multicultural genetic counseling: then, now and in the 21st century. Am J Med Genet 2001;106:208–215.
31.
Betancourt H, Lopez S: The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American Psychology; in Peplau LA, Taylor SE (eds): Sociocultural Perspectives in Social Psychology: Current Readings.Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, 1997.
32.
Deshpande AD, Thompson VL, Vaughn KP, Kreuter MW: The use of sociocultural constructs in cancer screening research among African Americans. Cancer Control 2009;16:256–263.
33.
Stryker S, Serpe RT: Identity salience and psychological centrality: equivalent, overlapping or complementary concepts? Soc Psychol Quart 1994;57:16–36.
34.
Sellers RM, Rowley SA, Chavous TM, Shelton JN, Smith MA: Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: a preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997;73:805–815.
35.
Phinney JS: The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: a new scale for use with diverse groups. J Adolescent Res 1992;7:156–176.
36.
Cokley KO: Racial(ized) identity, ethnic identity, and Afrocentric values: conceptual and methodological challenges in understanding African American identity. J Couns Psychol 2005;52:517–526.
37.
Cornell S, Hartmann D: Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks, Pine Forge Press, 2007.
38.
Carter RT, Quereshi A: A typology of philosophical assumptions in multicultural counseling and training; in Ponterroto JG, Casas JM, Suzuki LA, Alexander CM (eds): Handbook of Multicultural Counseling. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1995, pp 239–262.
39.
Parham TA: Counseling Persons of African Descent: Raising the Bar of Practitioner Competence. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2002.
40.
Grills C, Longshore D: Africentrism: psychometric analyses of a self-report measure. J Black Psychol 1996;22:86–106.
41.
New York City Department of City Planning Population Division: The Newest New Yorkers 2000, Immigrant New York in the New Millennium, NYC DCP #04-10. New York, NYC Dept of City Planning, 2004.
42.
Parmigiani G, Berry DA, Aquilar O: Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:145–158.
43.
Frank TS, Manley SA, Olopade OI, Cummings S, Garber JE, Bernhardt B, Antman K, Russo D, Wood ME, Mullineau L, Isaacs C, Peshkin B, Buys S, Venne V, Rowley PT, Loader S, Offit K, Robson M, Hampel H, Brener D, Winer EP, Clark S, Weber B, Strong LC, Thomas A, et al: Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2417–2425.
44.
Couch FJ, DeShano ML, Blackwood MA, Calzone K, Stopfer J, Campeau L, Ganguly A, Rebbeck T, Weber BL: BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1409–1415.
45.
Jacobsen PB, Valdimarsdottir HB, Brown KL, Offit K: Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosom Med 1997;59:459–466.
46.
Hughes C, Lerman C, Lustbader E: Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996;40:25–35.
47.
Lipkus IM, Iden D, Terrenoire J, Feaganes JR: Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:533–539.
48.
Halbert C, Kessler L, Stopfer JE, Domchek S, Wileyto EP: Low rates of acceptance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results among African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast–ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2006;8:576–582.
49.
Phinney JS: Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: review of research. Psychol Bull1990;108:499–514.
50.
Brook JS, Pahl K: The protective role of ethnic and racial identity and aspects of an Africentric orientation against drug use among African American young adults. J Genet Psychol 2005;166:329–345.
51.
Helms JE: Black and White Racial Identity: Theory, Research and Practice. Westport, Greenwood Press, 1990.
52.
Landrine H, Klonoff E: The African American acculturation scale: origin and current status; in Jones RL (ed): Handbook of Tests and Measurements for Black Populations. Hampton, Cobb and Henry Publishers, 1996.
53.
Bowen DJ, Christensen CL, Powers D, Graves DR, Anderson CA: Effects of counseling and ethnic identity on perceived risk and cancer worry in African American women. J Clin Psychol Med S 1998;5:365–379.
54.
Scribner R, Hohn A, Dwyer J: Blood pressure and self-concept among African-American adolescents. J Natl Med Assoc1995;87:417–422.
55.
Bowen D, Hickman KM, Powers D: Importance of psychological variables in understanding risk perceptiosn and breast cancer screening of African American women. Womens Health 1997;3:227–242.
56.
Parham TA, Helms JE: Attitudes of racial identity and self-esteem of Black students: an exploratory study. J Coll St Personnel 1985a;26:143–147.
57.
Cross WE Jr: Shades of Black: Diversity in African-American Identity. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1991.
58.
Parham TA, Helms JE: Relation of racial identity attitudes to self-actualization and affective states of Black students. J Couns Psychol 1985b;32:431–440.
59.
Rowley SJ, Sellers RM, Chavous TM, Smith MA: The relationship between racial identity and self-esteem in African American college and high school students. J Pers Soc Psychol1998;74:715–724.
60.
Taylor RD, Casten R, Flickinger SM, Roberts D, Fulmore CD: Explaining the school performance of African American adolescents. J Res Adolescence 1994;4:21–44.
61.
Azibo D: Liberation Psychology.Trenton, African World Press, 1992.
62.
Miller DB: Racial socialization and racial identity: can they promote resiliency for African American adolescents? Adolescence 1999;135:493–501.
63.
Rose AL, Peters N, Shea JA, Armstrong K: Attitudes and misconceptions about predictive genetic testing for cancer risk: a focus group study. Community Genet 2005;8:145–151.
64.
Catz DS, Green NS, Tobin JN, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Kyler P, Umemoto A, Cernoch J, Browne R, Wolman F: Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genet 2005;8:161–172.
65.
Nasim A, Belgrave FZ, Jagers RJ, Wilson KD, Owens K: The moderating effects of culture on peer deviance and alcohol use among high-risk African-American adolescents. J Drug Educ 2007;37:335–363.
66.
Belgrave FZ, Van Oss Marin B, Chambers DB: Cultural, contextual and intrapersonal predictors of risky sexual attitudes among urban African American girls in early adolescence. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2000;6:309–322.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.