Potassium channel openers are currently being evaluated for their inhibitory effect on hyperreflexia. Increasing potassium permeability results in a hyperpolarization of the smooth muscle membrane and a reduction in calcium entry. This stabilizes the membrane and should result in the reduction of spontaneous contractile activity. Potassium channel agonists have been shown to be effective in the reduction of hyperreflexia secondary to outlet obstruction in rats, and certainly have been shown to reduce the contractile responses of isolated tissues to a number of different agonists. In addition, intravesical administration of potassium channel openers have been shown to be effective against hyperreflexia (in rabbits) using intravesical administration, although relatively high concentrations had to be employed. Using an in vitro whole bladder model (rat), our current study compares the potency and efficacy of intravesical versus extravesical administration of two potassium channel openers for the inhibition of field-stimulated contraction. The results demonstrate that (1) the extracellular administration of ZD6169 and cromakalim were equally effective inhibitors of the contractile response to field stimulation, (2) low frequency stimulation was inhibited to a significantly greater degree than high frequency stimulation, (3) intravesical administration of ZD6169 was equally effective at inhibiting the response to low frequency field stimulation when compared to extravesical administration, (4) intravesical administration was less effective than extravesical administration at high frequency stimulation (although the inhibition was still statistically significant), and (5) intravesical administration of cromakalim did not inhibit field stimulation.

Keywords:
Bladder, rat, Potassium channel openers
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.