The time-course of the development and disappearance of physical dependence to morphine was studied in rats using the implantation method of Huidobro and Contreras (8). Groups of 12 rats were challenged with 10 mg/kg of levallorphan tartrate at various times from 3 to 96 h after implantation and the intensity of abstinence gauged by the behavioral reaction to a battery of graded mechanical stimuli. Physical dependence develops exponentially with a time-constant of 12 h, becoming 95 % complete at 48 h. The time-course of withdrawal abstinence was studied following the removal of the morphine tablets 96 h after implantation in a group of 13 rats. It requires 12 h for the intensity of abstinence to reach a maximum and the intensity at this time is comparable to that obtained with levallorphan challenge in the presence of morphine. This was confirmed in a third study of four groups of 18 rats each in which the tablets were removed 48, 72, 84 and 92 h after implantation and the animals challenged at the 96th h. In the 84 and 92 h groups, levallorphan enhanced the intensity of abstinence, whereas in the 48 and 72 h groups it did not, although the prechallenge irritability scores of these animals were still significantly greater than normal control scores. Rats implanted with levallorphan or pentazocine tablets are refractory to subsequent injections of morphine (D’Amour-Smith test) (3) and of levallorphan. The implantation of morphine simultaneously with or subsequent to levallorphan implantation neither produces signs of analgesic depression nor causes physical dependence to develop. Implantation of levallorphan 96 h after the implantation of morphine produces signs of abstinence lasting 96 h at which time the animals are similar behaviorally to those in whom the implantations were made simultaneously. A second implant of morphine at 96 h is without further effect in morphine-implanted rats.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.