Introduction: Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rarely occurring lymphoid malignancy which typically affects young adults and presents itself as an anterior mediastinal mass. Gene expression profiling as well as somatic genetic analysis revealed that it is closely related to classical Hodgkin lymphoma, whereas morphologically, it tends to resemble diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Familial clustering of PMBL is rare – only two reports have been published to date. While it is generally accepted that positive family history is associated with increased risk of developing a lymphoma, genetic risk factors which might predispose to PMBL are largely unknown. Case Presentation: We performed germline and tumor genetic analyses by whole-exome sequencing and array-CGH of a family, in which the father and the son both developed a PMBL. Germline investigations of both affected patients and of their two unaffected family members have not been able to provide a single risk factor associated with lymphoma predisposition. In addition, genes that were previously implicated in increased risk for PMBL, namely MLL (KMT2A) and TIRAP, were found to be intact in all investigated family members. Somatic genetic investigations identified known as well as novel genetic aberrations in tumors of the affected subjects. Conclusion: We conclude that predisposition to a PMBL might be inherited through a combination of low- or moderate-risk factors and provide a shortlist of the most likely selected candidates, which can be used in future studies.

Established Facts

Evidence for a genetic predisposition to lymphoma comes from large epidemiological studies and familial clustering of lymphoma cases. Multiple factors with a small effect size were mostly implicated, but some monogenetic predisposing factors were also suggested in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma.

Novel Insights

Comprehensive characterization of the affected family did not confirm previously described predisposing genetic factors, and no additional strong causes could be identified. Our results support the current view that genetic predisposition to lymphoma is most likely caused by multiple factors with a small effect size.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare lymphoid malignancy, making up 6–12% of all large B-cell lymphomas. It occurs more often in women (46–76% of cases) with a median age of presentation of 32 years (range: 27–42) [1].

It is well established that a positive familial history of lymphoid malignancy is associated with an increased risk of lymphoma [2]. Although it is difficult to completely exclude nongenetic risk factors (e.g., dietary influence, shared environmental exposure), common genetic make-up is regarded as the most important factor contributing to such an increased risk. A handful of rare genetic syndromes and variety of single nucleotide polymorphisms have been implicated to the increased genetic susceptibility for lymphomas [2‒4]. The majority of the latter are common genome variants (>5% population frequency) with low to modest effect, identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [2]. Rare single variants with moderate to strong predisposing effects, except for rare syndromic diseases, have not yet been identified. Moreover, as such studies require a large number of cases, it is often difficult to identify risk factors associated with a specific disease subtype. Owing to the rare occurrence of PMBL, familial risk factors for this disease have not been established. In one study, a KMT2A c.5533C>A, p.(His1845Asn) variant has been associated with familial clustering of PMBL [5]. Earlier, we contributed to the identification of a new TIRAP sequence variant c.241C>T p.(Arg81Cys) implicated in increased familial risk of PMBL [6].

Here, we report on a familial clustering of PMBL over two generations with a father and a son affected. We performed HLA typing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and genome-wide aCGH analysis on the patients’ tumors and peripheral blood cells obtained upon disease remission and the peripheral blood of their non-affected relatives, searching for a possible genetic predisposition factor.

Mediastinal masses were detected in the father (patient I-1) and son (patient II-1) in the course of the workup of a symptomatic cough. The father was diagnosed in January 2006 at the age of 67 years, and the son in August 2013 at the age of 48. Patient’s I-1 tumor, diagnosed on a transthoracal core needle biopsy, displayed a large cell lymphoma composed of slightly polymorphic centroblastoid cells, surrounded by compartmentalizing argyrophilic fibers. The tumor cells were positive for CD20, CD30 (partially), CD79a, p63, and BOB1, while being negative for CD15, CD23, and LMP1 of EBV. Patient’s II-1 tumor was diagnosed on a thoracoscopic excisional biopsy and showed a partially necrotic, large-cell lymphoma composed of polymorphic centroblastoid cells with clear cytoplasm, surrounded by compartmentalizing argyrophilic fibers. The tumor cells were positive for CD20, CD23, CD45, CD79a, p63, and BCL2, while remaining negative for CD15, CD30, C-MYC, and EBER. Diagnoses of PMBL were established. Both patients suffered from stage IB bulky disease confined to the mediastinum, without further organ or bone marrow involvement, as established by CT (I-1) and PET-CT (II-1) scans. While there were no tumor-associated complications in the father, the son’s lymphoma caused thrombosis of the left subclavian vein and hoarseness due to tumor-associated palsy of the left nervus laryngeus recurrens. A weight loss >10% and elevated LDH accompanied both clinical presentations.

Treatment consisted of 6 courses of R-CHOP without radiotherapy in patient I-1 and 6 cycles of DA-EPOCH without radiotherapy in patient II-1. Both patients achieved a partial response at interim staging and complete remission at the end of therapy. The son’s secondary symptoms were completely relieved after therapy. After a follow-up of 17 years (father) and 10 years (son), both remain in complete remission without any therapy- or tumor-related secondary problems.

Materials and methods to obtaining the results described below are defined in online supplementary materials (for all online suppl. material, see https://doi.org/10.1159/000532053). aCGH revealed a complex aberrant tumor genome of patient II-1 with 54 different copy number segments (deletions or duplications) larger than 400 kbp affecting 15 autosomes and the X chromosome (Fig. 1). Tumor copy number profile of patient I-1 showed hyperdiploid genome with trisomies 9, 12, and 20 as well as gain in the short arm of chromosome 6. Both tumors of patients I-1 and of II-1 displayed a classical spectrum of PMBL-associated genetic aberrations: amplification of 9p24 (affecting the JAK2, PDL1/2 loci), duplication of the HLA locus at 6p, and partial deletion and amplification of chromosome 16 affecting the SOCS1 and CIITA locus, respectively. Other aberrations (e.g., gain of the REL locus at 2p16.1, deletion of the HLA at 6p21.3, and TNFAIP3 at 6q23.3) that are frequently reported in PMBL were absent.

Fig. 1.

Top: Family pedigree segregating PMBL. Bottom: Copy number profiles of PMBL in both patients showing common alterations in chromosomes 6, 9, and 20 (arrows).

Fig. 1.

Top: Family pedigree segregating PMBL. Bottom: Copy number profiles of PMBL in both patients showing common alterations in chromosomes 6, 9, and 20 (arrows).

Close modal

At the nucleotide level, WES of tumor II-1 identified a total of 182 nonsynonymous somatic variants (online suppl. Table 1). Except for frameshift deletion of HIST1H3B, the majority of these variants have unclear functional consequences for tumor development as they have not been previously described as frequently occurring in PMBL [7, 8]. The tumor of patient I-1 was not sequenced due to insufficient material available and poor quality of extracted DNA.

Germline DNA investigations by WES and aCGH in affected patients as well as segregation analysis in their unaffected family members (I-2 and II-2) were performed, attempting to find an explanation for the familial clustering of this rare disorder. Closely considered variant candidates fulfilled all the following criteria: (1) nonsynonymous, deleterious (nonsense, truncating, damaging missense mutations as predicted by in silico analysis); (2) located in genes that are involved in immune cell development and function, cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA repair, carcinogen metabolism or are implicated in lymphoma predisposition by currently available studies; 3) present in both affected patients. The presence/absence of a genetic variant in the unaffected brother was not an inclusion/exclusion criterion due to the possibility of reduced-/age-related penetrance of the predisposing factor. Additionally, we looked into genes that were altered in the patients’ tumors, aiming to detect putative tumor suppressors inactivated by a somatic “second-hit.” Variants fulfilling the abovementioned criteria are listed in Table 1. In addition, genetic typing of HLA alleles was performed in patients I-1 and II-2 (Table 2), aiming to compare identified haplotypes with those already implicated in lymphoma predisposition.

Table 1.

Candidate variants considered potential candidates of PMBL predisposition

GenesCodingAmino acid changeVariant effectIn COSMIC cancer censusSomatically altered in tumor (II-1)Known_gene in lymphoma predispositionMetaLR_predEuropean population frequency (%, ExAC)Present in patients
HLA-DRB5 c.97C>T p.Arg33Ter Nonsense No Yes Yes  20.9 I-1; II-1; II-2 
CYP1B1 c.1103G>A p.Arg368His Missense No No Yes 0.3 I-1; II-1 
HLA-DRB5 c.88G>A p.Gly30Arg Missense No Yes Yes 22.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
HLA-DRB5 c.59T>C p.Met20Thr Missense No Yes Yes 32.4 I-1; II-1; II-2 
BTNL2 c.586A>G p.Lys196Glu Missense No No Yes 36.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
BTNL2 c.1078A>G p.Ser360Gly Missense No No Yes 43.1 I-1; II-1; II-2 
EP400 c.6679G>A p.Asp2227Asn Missense No No No 0.02 I-1; II-1; II-2 
WRN c.970A>G p.Thr324Ala Missense Yes No Yes 0.4 I-1; II-1 
CPT1C c.2077C>A p.Leu693Met Missense No No No 0.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
MPO c.752T>C p.Met251Thr Missense No No Yes 1.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
UGT1A8 c.830G>A p.Cys277Tyr Missense No No No 2.0 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ACAD9 c.976G>A p.Ala326Thr Missense No No No 2.6 I-1; II-1 
PRF1 c.272C>T p.Ala91Val Missense Yes No No 4.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ARAP3 c.4282A>C p.Thr1428Pro Missense No No No 6.4 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1291T>C p.Cys431Arg Missense No Yes Yes 10.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1199A>C p.Glu400Ala Missense No Yes Yes 10.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL34 c.639C>A p.Tyr213Ter Nonsense No Yes No  11.2 I-1; II-1 
HLA-B c.668C>T p.Ala223Val Missense No No No 12.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1507T>C p.Ser503Pro Missense No Yes Yes 16.2 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1727A>G p.Gln576Arg Missense No Yes Yes 20.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
SP110 c.617C>T p.Ala206Val Missense No No Yes 24.0 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ITSN2 c.4600G>A p.Ala1534Thr Missense No No No 24.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
LEPR c.326A>G p.Lys109Arg Missense No No Yes 25.9 I-1; II-1; II-2 
WRN c.4099T>C p.Cys1367Arg Missense Yes No Yes 26.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
HLA-DPB1 c.596C>T p.Thr199Ile Missense No No Yes 28.1 I-1; II-1; II-2 
TIAM2 c.3301C>T p.Arg1101Cys Missense No Yes No 29.7 I-1; II-1; II-2 
LTA c.179C>A p.Thr60Asn Missense No No Yes 33.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
SEC14L3 c.308T>C p.Ile103Thr Missense No No No 33.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
MUT c.1595G>A p.Arg532His Missense No Yes No 36.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.223A>G p.Ile75Val Missense No Yes Yes 44.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
FAM111B c.392del p.Tyr132fs Frameshift deletion No No No NA NA I-1; II-1; II-2 
REV1 c.3240_3241insC p.Gly1081fs Frameshift insertion No No No NA No MAF I-1; II-1 
TOP1MT c.844del p.Thr282fs Frameshift deletion No Yes No NA NA I-1; II-1 
SEMA7A c.268G>T p.Gly90Ter Nonsense No No No  NA I-1; II-1 
GenesCodingAmino acid changeVariant effectIn COSMIC cancer censusSomatically altered in tumor (II-1)Known_gene in lymphoma predispositionMetaLR_predEuropean population frequency (%, ExAC)Present in patients
HLA-DRB5 c.97C>T p.Arg33Ter Nonsense No Yes Yes  20.9 I-1; II-1; II-2 
CYP1B1 c.1103G>A p.Arg368His Missense No No Yes 0.3 I-1; II-1 
HLA-DRB5 c.88G>A p.Gly30Arg Missense No Yes Yes 22.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
HLA-DRB5 c.59T>C p.Met20Thr Missense No Yes Yes 32.4 I-1; II-1; II-2 
BTNL2 c.586A>G p.Lys196Glu Missense No No Yes 36.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
BTNL2 c.1078A>G p.Ser360Gly Missense No No Yes 43.1 I-1; II-1; II-2 
EP400 c.6679G>A p.Asp2227Asn Missense No No No 0.02 I-1; II-1; II-2 
WRN c.970A>G p.Thr324Ala Missense Yes No Yes 0.4 I-1; II-1 
CPT1C c.2077C>A p.Leu693Met Missense No No No 0.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
MPO c.752T>C p.Met251Thr Missense No No Yes 1.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
UGT1A8 c.830G>A p.Cys277Tyr Missense No No No 2.0 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ACAD9 c.976G>A p.Ala326Thr Missense No No No 2.6 I-1; II-1 
PRF1 c.272C>T p.Ala91Val Missense Yes No No 4.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ARAP3 c.4282A>C p.Thr1428Pro Missense No No No 6.4 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1291T>C p.Cys431Arg Missense No Yes Yes 10.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1199A>C p.Glu400Ala Missense No Yes Yes 10.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL34 c.639C>A p.Tyr213Ter Nonsense No Yes No  11.2 I-1; II-1 
HLA-B c.668C>T p.Ala223Val Missense No No No 12.8 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1507T>C p.Ser503Pro Missense No Yes Yes 16.2 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.1727A>G p.Gln576Arg Missense No Yes Yes 20.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
SP110 c.617C>T p.Ala206Val Missense No No Yes 24.0 I-1; II-1; II-2 
ITSN2 c.4600G>A p.Ala1534Thr Missense No No No 24.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
LEPR c.326A>G p.Lys109Arg Missense No No Yes 25.9 I-1; II-1; II-2 
WRN c.4099T>C p.Cys1367Arg Missense Yes No Yes 26.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
HLA-DPB1 c.596C>T p.Thr199Ile Missense No No Yes 28.1 I-1; II-1; II-2 
TIAM2 c.3301C>T p.Arg1101Cys Missense No Yes No 29.7 I-1; II-1; II-2 
LTA c.179C>A p.Thr60Asn Missense No No Yes 33.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
SEC14L3 c.308T>C p.Ile103Thr Missense No No No 33.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
MUT c.1595G>A p.Arg532His Missense No Yes No 36.5 I-1; II-1; II-2 
IL4R c.223A>G p.Ile75Val Missense No Yes Yes 44.6 I-1; II-1; II-2 
FAM111B c.392del p.Tyr132fs Frameshift deletion No No No NA NA I-1; II-1; II-2 
REV1 c.3240_3241insC p.Gly1081fs Frameshift insertion No No No NA No MAF I-1; II-1 
TOP1MT c.844del p.Thr282fs Frameshift deletion No Yes No NA NA I-1; II-1 
SEMA7A c.268G>T p.Gly90Ter Nonsense No No No  NA I-1; II-1 
Table 2.

Results of germline HLA genotyping of the affected patients

Father (I-1)Son (II-1)
Allele 1Allele 2Allele 1Allele 2
A*02:01 A*03:01 A*02:01 A*03:01 
B*15:01 B*44:02 B*40:01 B*44:02 
C*03:03 C*05:01 C*03:04 C*05:01 
DRB1*04:04 DRB1*13:01 DRB1*04:04 DRB1*15:01 
DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 
Father (I-1)Son (II-1)
Allele 1Allele 2Allele 1Allele 2
A*02:01 A*03:01 A*02:01 A*03:01 
B*15:01 B*44:02 B*40:01 B*44:02 
C*03:03 C*05:01 C*03:04 C*05:01 
DRB1*04:04 DRB1*13:01 DRB1*04:04 DRB1*15:01 
DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 DRB4*01:03 

Shared alleles between the two probands are italicized.

These analyses did not reveal a single genetic factor explaining the familial clustering of PMBL. The previously described genetic variants in KMT2A[5] and TIRAP [6] genes were absent. Both patients I-1 and II-2 displayed a heterozygous nonsense variant in the HLA-DRB5 gene c.97C>T, p.(Arg33Ter), leading to truncation of the protein shortly after a signal peptide, resulting in loss of function. The HLA-DRB5 gene that encodes HLA class II DRβ-chain has been implicated in lymphoma predisposition by GWAS [9]. However, this gene has multiple paralogues (DRB1, DBR3, DRB4), suggesting that its function is redundant. Moreover, this particular variant represents a frequent variation in Europeans (MAF=21%). Thus, a strong predisposing effect of this variant is very unlikely.

A heterozygous CYP1B1 missense variant c.1103G>A, p.(Arg368His) was also detected in both patients. The affected gene encodes the CYP superfamily member cytochrome P450 1B1, functioning as heme-thiolate-monooxygenase. This protein is involved in the metabolism of various xenobiotics and is expressed in a large variety of tissues. The currently detected variant is reliably predicted to be damaging by multiple in silico algorithms (MetaLR rankscore 0.85), and in vitro functional studies have shown that this variant leads to decreased metabolic rates of various tested substrates including estradiol, arachidonic acid, and retinoid [10]. Moreover, this variant is heavily debated regarding its role in the development of autosomal recessive primary congenital glaucoma [11]. However, there is evidence that an active CYP1B1 function, rather than abrogation of it, may be linked to increased carcinogenesis [12], which is explained by the fact that CYP1B1 activates procarcinogens, bringing up their carcinogenic effect. It has been demonstrated that Cyp1b1-null mice treated with 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]-anthracene (DMBA) develop aggressive lymphomas less frequently than wild-type mice [13]. Thus, according to current knowledge, inactivating mutations in CYP1B1 as detected in this family should decrease the probability of lymphoma rather than predispose to it.

Other detected variants frequently affect interleukin and interleukin receptor genes (IL34, IL4R), suggesting a possible involvement of interleukin signaling as potential predisposition factor, especially given its important role in immune cell functioning. Additional mutated immune regulators included SEMA7A and BTNL2, which play an important role in integrin-mediated regulation of immune responses and suppressing T-cell proliferation, respectively.

Owing to the rarity of PMBL, no associations are known between HLA alleles and disease risk. However, such data exist for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), which is a similar disease based on gene expression and somatic mutational signatures [14]. Interestingly, our patients do not have HLA alleles implicated in increased risk for cHL but carry HLA*02 and DRB1*04:04 haplotypes, which are associated with a reduced risk for cHL [15]. Taking into account the limitations of such an analysis, we cautiously conclude that physiological variations of HLA alleles were not among the genetic predisposing factors in this particular case of familial PMBL clustering.

We report a family with occurrence of the same rare lymphoma subtype in two first-degree relatives across two generations. Thorough genetic characterization of tumor and germline genomes as well as segregation analysis in the two unaffected family members could not clearly determine whether this noticeable clustering has occurred due to an underlying genetic predisposition or purely by chance. The fact that we find KMT2A and TIRAP, genes that have been implicated in familial PBML previously [5, 6], unaffected in our present study implicates that genetic alterations in PBML, even in familial-associated cases, are more complex than hitherto appreciated. Our findings are in line with the current concept of lymphoma predisposition being most likely the net effect of an accumulation of factors with low effect size rather than one strong predisposing alteration.

The study was approved by the Ethikkommission Nordwest-und Zentralschweiz (EKNZ) reference No.: 2014-127, issued on 22 September 2014. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for analysis of their biological samples and publication of their medical cases.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

The study was funded by the Krebsliga beider Basel, Grant No.: 09-2014.

D.J. designed the study, performed genetic analysis, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; P.L. performed exome sequencing and reviewed the manuscript; A.T. performed histopathological characterization of cases, analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript; S.D. designed the study, performed histopathological characterization of cases, and reviewed the manuscript; and F.S. designed the study, performed clinical characterization of cases, and reviewed the manuscript.

Data are not publicly available due to legal reasons. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

1.
Bhatt VR, Mourya R, Shrestha R, Armitage JO. Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 Jun;41(6):476–85.
2.
Cerhan JR, Slager SL. Familial predisposition and genetic risk factors for lymphoma. Blood. 2015;126(20):2265–73.
3.
Skibola CF, Curry JD, Nieters A. Genetic susceptibility to lymphoma. Haematologica. 2007 Jul;92(7):960–9.
4.
Szmyd B, Mlynarski W, Pastorczak A. Genetic predisposition to lymphomas: overview of rare syndromes and inherited familial variants. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021;788:108386.
5.
Saarinen S, Kaasinen E, Karjalainen-Lindsberg M-L, Vesanen K, Aavikko M, Katainen R, et al. Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma segregating in a family: exome sequencing identifies MLL as a candidate predisposition gene. Blood. 2013 Apr;121(17):3428–30.
6.
Burkhard R, Keller I, Arambasic M, Juskevicius D, Tzankov A, Lundberg P, et al. TIRAP p.R81C is a novel lymphoma risk variant which enhances cell proliferation via NF-κB mediated signaling in B-cells. Haematologica. 2019 Apr;104(4):766–77.
7.
Mottok A, Hung SS, Chavez EA, Woolcock B, Telenius A, Chong LC, et al. Integrative genomic analysis identifies key pathogenic mechanisms in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019 Sep;134(10):802–13.
8.
Chapuy B, Stewart C, Dunford AJ, Kim J, Wienand K, Kamburov A, et al. Genomic analyses of PMBL reveal new drivers and mechanisms of sensitivity to PD-1 blockade. Blood. 2019;134(26):2369–82.
9.
Skibola CF, Bracci PM, Halperin E, Conde L, Craig DW, Agana L, et al. Genetic variants at 6p21.33 are associated with susceptibility to follicular lymphoma. Nat Genet. 2009;41(8):873–5.
10.
Choudhary D, Jansson I, Sarfarazi M, Schenkman JB. Characterization of the biochemical and structural phenotypes of four CYP1B1 mutations observed in individuals with primary congenital glaucoma. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008 Aug;18(8):665–76.
11.
Alsaif HS, Khan AO, Patel N, Alkuraya H, Hashem M, Abdulwahab F, et al. Congenital glaucoma and CYP1B1: an old story revisited. Hum Genet. 2019;138(8–9):1043–9.
12.
Li F, Zhu W, Gonzalez FJ. Potential role of CYP1B1 in the development and treatment of metabolic diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;178:18–30.
13.
Buters JTM, Sakai S, Richter T, Pineau T, Alexander DL, Savas U, et al. Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 determines susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(5):1977–82.
14.
Bosch-Schips J, Granai M, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Fend F. The grey zones of classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancers. 2022 Jan;14(3):742.
15.
Kushekhar K, Van Den Berg A, Nolte I, Hepkema B, Visser L, Diepstra A. Genetic associations in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and insights into susceptibility mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(12):2737–47.