Conventional light microscopy (CLM) has classically been the basic tool to teach histology and pathology. In recent years, whole-slide imaging (WSI), which consists of generating a high-magnification digital image of an entire histological glass slide, has emerged as a useful alternative to CLM offering a myriad of opportunities for education. Navigation through the digitized slides closely simulates viewing glass slides with a microscope and is also referred to as virtual microscopy. WSI has many advantages for education. Students feel more comfortable with its use, and it can be used in any classroom as it only requires a computer with Internet access and it allows remote access from anywhere and from any device. WSI can be used simultaneously by a large number of people, stimulating cooperation between students and improving the interaction with the teachers. It allows making marks and annotations on specific fields, which enable specific directed questions to the teacher. Finally, WSI supports are cost-effective compared with CLM. Consequently, WSI has begun to replace CLM in many institutions. WSI has shown to be an extremely useful tool for undergraduate education (medical, dental and veterinary schools), for the training of residents of pathology, tele-education and in tumor boards.

Keywords:
Medical education, Teaching, Virtual microscopy, Whole-slide imaging
1.
Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Brauer L: Virtual microscopy - the future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann Anat 2010;192:378-382.
2.
Blake CA, Lavoie HA, Millette CF: Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine: transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. Anat Rec B New Anat 2003;275:196-206.
3.
Pantanowitz L, Valenstein PN, Evans AJ, Kaplan KJ, Pfeifer JD, Wilbur DC, Collins LC, Colgan TJ: Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:36.
4.
Al-Janabi S, Huisman A, Van Diest PJ: Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives. Histopathology 2012;61:1-9.
5.
Anyanwu GE, Agu AU, Anyaehie UB: Enhancing learning objectives by use of simple virtual microscopic slides in cellular physiology and histology: impact and attitudes. Adv Physiol Educ 2012;36:158-163.
6.
Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD, Braun MW: Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2009;2:218-226.
7.
Farah CS, Maybury TS: The e-evolution of microscopy in dental education. J Dent Educ 2009;73:942-949.
8.
Fonseca FP, Santos-Silva AR, Lopes MA, Almeida OP, Vargas PA: Transition from glass to digital slide microscopy in the teaching of oral pathology in a Brazilian dental school. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015;20:e17-e22.
9.
Boutonnat J, Paulin C, Faure C, Colle PE, Ronot X, Seigneurin D: A pilot study in two French medical schools for teaching histology using virtual microscopy. Morphologie 2006;90:21-25.
10.
Ordi O, Bombi JA, Martinez A, Ramirez J, Alos L, Saco A, Ribalta T, Fernandez PL, Campo E, Ordi J: Virtual microscopy in the undergraduate teaching of pathology. J Pathol Inform 2015;6:1.
11.
Romer DJ, Suster S: Use of virtual microscopy for didactic live-audience presentation in anatomic pathology. Ann Diagn Pathol 2003;7:67-72.
12.
Foster K: Medical education in the digital age: digital whole slide imaging as an e-learning tool. J Pathol Inform 2010;1:14.
13.
Harris T, Leaven T, Heidger P, Kreiter C, Duncan J, Dick F: Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology. Anat Rec 2001;265:10-14.
14.
Merk M, Knuechel R, Perez-Bouza A: Web-based virtual microscopy at the RWTH Aachen University: didactic concept, methods and analysis of acceptance by the students. Ann Anat 2010;192:383-387.
15.
Braun MW, Kearns KD: Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1:240-246.
16.
Craig FE, McGee JB, Mahoney JF, Roth CG: The Virtual Pathology Instructor: a medical student teaching tool developed using patient simulator software. Hum Pathol 2014;45:1985-1994.
17.
Hamilton PW, Wang Y, McCullough SJ: Virtual microscopy and digital pathology in training and education. APMIS 2012;120:305-315.
18.
Collier L, Dunham S, Braun MW, O'Loughlin VD: Optical versus virtual: teaching assistant perceptions of the use of virtual microscopy in an undergraduate human anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 2012;5:10-19.
19.
Szymas J, Lundin M: Five years of experience teaching pathology to dental students using the WebMicroscope. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(suppl 1):S13.
20.
Helin H, Lundin M, Lundin J, Martikainen P, Tammela T, Helin H, van der Kwast T, Isola J: Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading. Hum Pathol 2005;36:381-386.
21.
Marsch AF, Espiritu B, Groth J, Hutchens KA: The effectiveness of annotated (vs. non-annotated) digital pathology slides as a teaching tool during dermatology and pathology residencies. J Cutan Pathol 2014;41:513-518.
22.
Pantanowitz L, Szymas J, Yagi Y, Wilbur D: Whole slide imaging for educational purposes. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:46.
23.
Linder E, Lundin M, Thors C, Lebbad M, Winiecka-Krusnell J, Helin H, Leiva B, Isola J, Lundin J: Web-based virtual microscopy for parasitology: a novel tool for education and quality assurance. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008;2:e315.
24.
Kumar RK, Velan GM, Korell SO, Kandara M, Dee FR, Wakefield D: Virtual microscopy for learning and assessment in pathology. J Pathol 2004;204:613-618.
25.
Chen YK, Hsue SS, Lin DC, Wang WC, Chen JY, Lin CC, Lin LM: An application of virtual microscopy in the teaching of an oral and maxillofacial pathology laboratory course. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:342-347.
26.
Diaz-Perez JA, Raju S, Echeverri JH: Evaluation of a teaching strategy based on integration of clinical subjects, virtual autopsy, pathology museum, and digital microscopy for medical students. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:25.
27.
Gatumu MK, MacMillan FM, Langton PD, Headley PM, Harris JR: Evaluation of usage of virtual microscopy for the study of histology in the medical, dental, and veterinary undergraduate programs of a UK University. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:389-398.
28.
Helle L, Nivala M, Kronqvist P, Gegenfurtner A, Bjork P, Saljo R: Traditional microscopy instruction versus process-oriented virtual microscopy instruction: a naturalistic experiment with control group. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(suppl 1):S8.
29.
McCready ZR, Jham BC: Dental students' perceptions of the use of digital microscopy as part of an oral pathology curriculum. J Dent Educ 2013;77:1624-1628.
30.
Weaker FJ, Herbert DC: Transition of a dental histology course from light to virtual microscopy. J Dent Educ 2009;73:1213-1221.
31.
Krippendorf BB, Lough J: Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anat Rec B New Anat 2005;285:19-25.
32.
Kumar RK, Freeman B, Velan GM, De Permentier PJ: Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anat Rec B New Anat 2006;289:128-133.
33.
Durosaro O, Lachman N, Pawlina W: Use of knowledge-sharing web-based portal in gross and microscopic anatomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2008;37:998-1001.
34.
Goldberg HR, Dintzis R: The positive impact of team-based virtual microscopy on student learning in physiology and histology. Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31:261-265.
35.
Triola MM, Holloway WJ: Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:4.
36.
Bruch LA, De Young BR, Kreiter CD, Haugen TH, Leaven TC, Dee FR: Competency assessment of residents in surgical pathology using virtual microscopy. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1122-1128.
37.
Gongora JH, Barcelo HA: Telepathology and continuous education: important tools for pathologists of developing countries. Diagn Pathol 2008;3(suppl 1):S24.
38.
Scoville SA, Buskirk TD: Traditional and virtual microscopy compared experimentally in a classroom setting. Clin Anat 2007;20:565-570.
39.
Sivamalai S, Murthy SV, Gupta TS, Woolley T: Teaching pathology via online digital microscopy: positive learning outcomes for rurally based medical students. Aust J Rural Health 2011;19:45-51.
40.
Inuwa IM, Taranikanti V, Al-Rawahy M, Habbal O: Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format? Anat Sci Educ 2012;5:27-32.
41.
Mione S, Valcke M, Cornelissen M: Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6:307-315.
42.
Tian Y, Xiao W, Li C, Liu Y, Qin M, Wu Y, Xiao L, Li H: Virtual microscopy system at Chinese medical university: an assisted teaching platform for promoting active learning and problem-solving skills. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:74.
43.
Brick KE, Sluzevich JC, Cappel MA, DiCaudo DJ, Comfere NI, Wieland CN: Comparison of virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy among dermatology residents during a simulated in-training examination. J Cutan Pathol 2013;40:807-811.
44.
Brick KE, Comfere NI, Broeren MD, Gibson LE, Wieland CN: The application of virtual microscopy in a dermatopathology educational setting: assessment of attitudes among dermatopathologists. Int J Dermatol 2014;53:224-227.
45.
Koch LH, Lampros JN, Delong LK, Chen SC, Woosley JT, Hood AF: Randomized comparison of virtual microscopy and traditional glass microscopy in diagnostic accuracy among dermatology and pathology residents. Hum Pathol 2009;40:662-667.
46.
Krupinski EA, Tillack AA, Richter L, Henderson JT, Bhattacharyya AK, Scott KM, Graham AR, Descour MR, Davis JR, Weinstein RS: Eye-movement study and human performance using telepathology virtual slides: implications for medical education and differences with experience. Hum Pathol 2006;37:1543-1556.
47.
Stewart J III, Bevans-Wilkins K, Bhattacharya A, Ye C, Miyazaki K, Kurtycz DF: Virtual microscopy: an educator's tool for the enhancement of cytotechnology students' locator skills. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:363-368.
48.
Donnelly AD, Mukherjee MS, Lyden ER, Radio SJ: Virtual microscopy in cytotechnology education: application of knowledge from virtual to glass. Cytojournal 2012;9:12.
49.
Heffner S: Streamlining tumor board reviews. Adv Lab 2008;17:20.
50.
Spinosa J: Scripp's tumor board finds value in digital imaging of slides. Dark Rep 2009;12:10-15.
51.
Conran R, Fontelo P, Liu F, Fontelo M, White E: Slide2Go: a virtual slide collection for pathology education. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007, p 918.
52.
Khalbuss WE, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV: Digital imaging in cytopathology. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:264683.
53.
Rosai J: Digital images of case reports and other articles. Int J Surg Pathol 2007;15:5.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.