Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are implicated in the etiology of diabetic complications in the kidney, nerve and eye. Skeletal muscle contractile parameters have also been found to be altered in diabetes. Glycation has not been extensively studied in skeletal muscle, but AGE-modified proteins may influence contractility. Objective and Methods: The aim of this study was to use immunohistochemistry to identify distribution patterns of the AGE NΕ-(carboxymethyl)-lysine in plantaris muscle of diabetic rats. Results: Results revealed the presence of NΕ-(carboxymethyl)-lysine intracellularly and also at sites along the myofiber periphery. The number of myofibers immunolabeling for AGE in animals with diabetes was more than 4-fold greater than in control animals. Additionally, there was a greater proportion of slow + fast myosin heavy chain coexpression in the AGE-positive cells from diabetic animals than in AGE-positive fibers from control animals. No significant difference was present between cross-sectional areas of AGE-positive fibers and AGE-negative fibers within the respective experimental groups. Conclusions: AGE accumulation is greater in skeletal muscle in vivo from diabetic animals than in control animals. This AGE accumulation appears to be associated with fiber-type transformation rather than with myofiber size. Further study is needed to determine the identity of these AGE-modified proteins and to determine how they influence skeletal muscle function in diabetes.

Keywords:
Immunohistochemistry, Advanced glycation end products, Diabetes mellitus, Skeletal muscle, Nε-(carboxymethyl)-lysine, CML
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.