Background/Aims: The threshold number of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) criteria for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis (CP) is variable. The presence of more than three abnormal ductular or parenchymal features is typically used, but the diagnostic significance of fewer EUS criteria is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of EUS features of CP in patients without pancreaticobiliary disease and to analyze the association with specific factors of interest. Methods: Over a 24-month period, 2,614 patients underwent EUS for an indication unrelated to pancreaticobiliary disease. Main outcome measurements wereunivariate and multivariate analysis between any EUS abnormality and demographic data and habits. Results: 82 patients (16.8%) showed at least one ductular or parenchymal abnormality. 38 patients presented with only one abnormal feature, 26 patients with two, 12 patients with three, 4 patients with four, and 2 patients with five. Low-level alcohol consumption significantly increased the risk of hyperechoic parenchymal foci, main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation and wall hyperechogenicity. Smoking was associated with an increased risk of hyperechoic parenchymal foci. Male gender and advanced age were significantly associated with an increased risk of MPD dilatation. Conclusions: Long-term smoking and alcohol consumption, although at a low dose, induces CP-like changes. These abnormalities might represent either a clinically silent CP or a toxic effect of smoking and alcohol. Conversely, MPD dilation might represent a normal age-related variant or, alternatively, an effect of chronic low-level alcohol consumption.

Keywords:
Endoscopic ultrasound, Chronic pancreatitis
1.
Raimondo M, Wallace MB: Diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis by endoscopic ultrasound. Are we there yet? JOP 2004;5:1–7.
2.
Sahai AV: EUS and chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S76–S81.
3.
Wirsema MJ, Wiersema LM: Endosonography of the pancreas: normal variation versus changes of early chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995;5:487–496.
4.
Rajan E, Clain JE, Levy MJ, et al: Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:401–406.
5.
Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, et al: Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy 1993;25:555–564.
6.
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva, WHO, 2001 (available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6a.pdf).
7.
Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L, et al: Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:18–25.
8.
Lehman GA: Role of ERCP and other endoscopic modalities in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56(suppl 6):S237–S240.
9.
Catalano MF, Lahoti S, Geenen JE, et al: Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and secretin test in diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:11–17.
10.
Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J, et al: Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP. Pancreas 1995;10:251–257.
11.
Nagai H, Ohtsubo K: Pancreatic lithiasis in the aged: its clinicopathology and pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 1984;86:221–238.
12.
Bhutani MS: Endoscopic ultrasonography: changes of chronic pancreatitis in asymptomatic and symptomatic alcoholic patients. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:455–462.
13.
Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V, et al: The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:294–299.
14.
Yusoff IF, Sahai A: A prospective, quantitative assessment of the effect of ethanol and other variables on the endosonographic appearance of the pancreas. Clin Gastronterol Hepatol 2004;2:405–409.
15.
Stamm BH: Incidence and diagnostic significance of minor pathologic changes in the adult pancreas at autopsy: a systematic study of 112 autopsies in patients without known pancreatic disease. Hum Pathol 1984;15:677–683.
16.
Ikeda M, Sato T, Morozumi A, et al: Morphologic changes in the pancreas detected by screening ultrasonography in a mass survey, with special reference to main duct dilatation, cyst formation, and calcification. Pancreas 1994;9:508–512.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.