Article PDF first page preview

First page of Sex-disaggregated analysis of pneumonia in patients with high-risk neutropenia

Introduction Pneumonia is a common and serious complication during high-risk neutropenia in patients with cancer. Even though sex differences were described in patients with infectious diseases or cancer in general, sex-specific analyses for pneumonia are lacking. This exploratory study aims to compare epidemiology and outcome of pneumonia between men and women in this high-risk cohort. Methods Patient data were harmonized from four primary databases collected by our research group at two tertiary care centers in Germany. High-risk neutropenia was either defined by duration of neutropenia or assumed for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients who developed pneumonia associated with febrile neutropenia were stratified by sex, and their characteristics during the first observed pneumonia case were compared. Additionally, all identified causative pathogens were stratified by sex and described. Results In total, 906 patients contributed 1,511 cases of high-risk neutropenia. Pneumonia occurred in 110/689 (16.0%) of cases in women and 132/822 (16.1%) of cases in men. Patient characteristics such as age, underlying disease and risk factors like duration of neutropenia did not show significant differences. ICU treatment was needed by 15/97 (15.5%) women and 22/104 (21.2%) men, and the in-hospital mortality was 5/98 (5.1%) in women and 12/113 (10.6%) in men, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Seventy-three causative pathogens were identified. Among them, Gram-positive pathogens were identified in three times as often in women (13/36 [36.1%]) than in men (5/37 [13.5%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002). In contrast, fungi were identified twice as often in men (13/37 [35.1%]) than in women (7/36 [19.4%]; p < 0.001, q = 0.002). Conclusion Our exploratory study suggests that while pneumonia rates are similar in women and men, pathogen patterns differ and outcomes may be different. These findings should be verified prospectively and in larger cohorts.

Journal Section:
Brief Report
This content is only available via PDF.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2025
You do not currently have access to this content.