Introduction: Cancer clinical trial accruals have been historically low and are affected by several factors. Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Meetings (MTBM) are conducted regularly and immensely help to devise a comprehensive care plan including discussions about clinical trial availability and eligibility. Objectives: To evaluate whether patient discussion at MTBM was associated with a higher consent rate for clinical trials at a single tertiary care center. Methods: Institutional electronic medical records (EMR) and clinical trials management system (OnCore) were queried to identify all new patient visits in oncology clinics, consents to clinical trials, and MTBM notes between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015. The association between MTBM discussion and subsequent clinical trial enrollment within 16 weeks of the new patient visit was evaluated using a χ2 test. Results: Between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2015, 11,794 new patients were seen in oncology clinics, and 2,225 patients (18.9%) were discussed at MTBMs. MTBM discussion conferred a higher rate of subsequent clinical trial consent within 16 weeks following the patient’s first consultation in an oncology clinic: 4.1% for those who were discussed at a MTBM compared to 2.8% for those not discussed (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that MTBMs may be effective in identifying patients eligible for available clinical trials by reviewing eligibility criteria during MTBM discussions. We recommend discussion of all new patients in MTBM to improve the quality of care provided to those with cancer and enhanced clinical trial accrual.

1.
NCI
.
NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms.
National Cancer Institute https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms?cdrid=322893. Accessed July 6, 2018.
2.
Gross
GE
.
The role of the tumor board in a community hospital
.
CA Cancer J Clin
.
1987
Mar-Apr
;
37
(
2
):
88
92
.
[PubMed]
0007-9235
3.
Chang
JH
,
Vines
E
,
Bertsch
H
,
Fraker
DL
,
Czerniecki
BJ
,
Rosato
EF
, et al.
.
The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience
.
Cancer
.
2001
Apr
;
91
(
7
):
1231
7
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
4.
NCCN
.
NCCN Guidelines & Clinical Resources.
National Comprehensive Care Network
2014
; https://www.nccn.org/about/permissions/reference.aspx. Accessed August 3, 2018.
5.
Unger
JM
,
Hershman
DL
,
Fleury
ME
,
Vaidya
R
.
Association of patient comorbid conditions with cancer clinical trial participation
.
JAMA Oncol
.
2019
Mar
;
5
(
3
):
326
33
.
[PubMed]
2374-2437
6.
Tejeda
HA
,
Green
SB
,
Trimble
EL
,
Ford
L
,
High
JL
,
Ungerleider
RS
, et al.
.
Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
1996
Jun
;
88
(
12
):
812
6
.
[PubMed]
0027-8874
7.
Lara
PN
Jr
,
Higdon
R
,
Lim
N
,
Kwan
K
,
Tanaka
M
,
Lau
DH
, et al.
.
Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2001
Mar
;
19
(
6
):
1728
33
.
[PubMed]
0732-183X
8.
Denicoff
AM
,
McCaskill-Stevens
W
,
Grubbs
SS
,
Bruinooge
SS
,
Comis
RL
,
Devine
P
, et al.
.
The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations
.
J Oncol Pract
.
2013
Nov
;
9
(
6
):
267
76
.
[PubMed]
1554-7477
9.
ACS CAN
. Barriers to Patient Enrollment in Therapeutic Clinical Trials for Cancer - A Landscape Report. Washington, D.C.
2018
.
10.
Larson
E
,
Skillman
S
.
Rural Urban Commuting Area code
.
Seattle (WA)
:
WWAMI Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington
;
2005
.
11.
Henson
DE
,
Frelick
RW
,
Ford
LG
,
Smart
CR
,
Winchester
D
,
Mettlin
C
, et al.
.
Results of a national survey of characteristics of hospital tumor conferences
.
Surg Gynecol Obstet
.
1990
Jan
;
170
(
1
):
1
6
.
[PubMed]
0039-6087
12.
Kuroki
L
,
Stuckey
A
,
Hirway
P
,
Raker
CA
,
Bandera
CA
,
DiSilvestro
PA
, et al.
.
Addressing clinical trials: can the multidisciplinary Tumor Board improve participation? A study from an academic women’s cancer program
.
Gynecol Oncol
.
2010
Mar
;
116
(
3
):
295
300
.
[PubMed]
0090-8258
13.
Scott
BL
,
Srivastava
D
,
Nijhawan
RI
.
The multidisciplinary tumor board for the management of cutaneous neoplasms: A national survey of academic medical centers
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
.
2018
Jun
;
78
(
6
):
1216
1218.e3
.
[PubMed]
0190-9622
14.
Grunfeld
E
,
Zitzelsberger
L
,
Coristine
M
,
Aspelund
F
.
Barriers and facilitators to enrollment in cancer clinical trials: qualitative study of the perspectives of clinical research associates
.
Cancer
.
2002
Oct
;
95
(
7
):
1577
83
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
15.
El Saghir
N
,
Keating
N
,
Carlson
R
,
Khoury
K
,
Fallowfield
L.
Tumor boards: Optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. ASCO Educational Book.
2014
:e461-e466.
16.
Unger
JM
,
Cook
E
,
Tai
E
,
Bleyer
A
.
Role of clinical trial participation in cancer research: barriers, evidence, and strategies
.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book
.
2016
;
35
:
185
98
.
[PubMed]
1548-8748
17.
Unger
JM
,
Moseley
A
,
Symington
B
,
Chavez-MacGregor
M
,
Ramsey
SD
,
Hershman
DL
.
Geographic distribution and survival outcomes for rural patients with cancer treated in clinical trials
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2018
Aug
;
1
(
4
):
e181235
181235
.
[PubMed]
2574-3805
18.
Wheeler
SB
.
Davis, Melinda M. “Taking the bull by the horns”: four principles to align public health, primary care, and community efforts to improve rural cancer control
.
J Rural Health
.
2017
;
•••
:
1
5
.0890-765X
19.
Mobley
EM
,
Foster
KJ
,
Terry
WW
.
Identifying and understanding the gaps in care experienced by adolescent and young adult cancer patients at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
.
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol
.
2018
Oct
;
7
(
5
):
592
603
.
[PubMed]
2156-5333
20.
Charlton
M
,
Schlichting
J
,
Chioreso
C
,
Ward
M
,
Vikas
P
.
Challenges of rural cancer care in the US.
Oncology Journal, Practice & Policy.
2015
;29(9).
21.
Mobley
EM
,
Charlton
ME
,
Ward
MM
,
Lynch
CF
.
Nonmetropolitan residence and other factors affecting clinical trial enrollment for adolescents and young adults with cancer in a US population–based study.
Cancer.
2019
;epub, ahead of print.
You do not currently have access to this content.