The present paper reports about a 16-year-old male with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) of the Wishart type with bilateral deafness who had undergone cochlear implantation after resection of the acoustic neuroma (AN) of the same side. Neural response telemetry (NRT) recordings are essential in those patients during cochlear implantation where no stapedial reflexes can be electrically elicited due to the resection of the AN. In the present case, amplitude growth function and a type II pattern of the NRT waveforms could be well established. The comparison of the N1 response intra-operatively and after 2 years showed a decline in latency by 50% and an increase in absolute amplitude by 10 times at the same current level of electrical stimulation. This improved auditory nerve transduction suggested a change to a ‘faster’ encoding strategy to improve speech understanding. The change from SPEAK to ACE 18 months after the operation led to an increase in the open-set sentence recognition test from 52 to 88%. Thus, NRT recordings monitor the intra-operative success of electrode placement and help to assess the integrity of the auditory pathway. Moreover, they can reliably be used in programming the speech processor postoperatively as objective tool. In patients with NF-2, the restoration of hearing can be successfully achieved in several ways. The indications for hearing implants (auditory brain stem and cochlear implants) should be carefully considered with respect to the remaining, functional integrity of the auditory nerve and the technical possibilities to monitor the success of these procedures.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.