We evaluated the possible relationship between tympanic membrane perforations resulting from blast trauma or slap and pneumatization of the mastoid cells. A total of 25 male patients with tympanic membrane perforations resulting from blast injury (n = 7), slap (n = 17), and football hit (n = 1) and 20 healthy male volunteers without any ear problem had temporal bone computed tomographic scans in the axial plane, parallel to the infraorbitomeatal line, with 2 mm slice thickness and 2-mm intervals using bone algorithm with a ProSpeed Spiral tomography machine. The area of air cells in each slice was measured using trace and area measurement functions of the tomography machine, and by multiplying the resulting area by slice thickness, the volume of each slice was calculated. For each ear, the total of volumes of air cells was calculated by adding the volumes of each slice containing air cells. The calculated volumes of mastoid cells were evaluated by comparing microscopic findings. Both patient and control groups consisted of males, and their ages ranged from 17 to 32 (mean 24.5) years. Microscopic examinations revealed that perforations were frequently located in the lower quadrants and that most of them were less than 3 mm. There were no pars flaccida and marginal perforations. Ossicular chain destruction was noted neither in temporal bone tomographic nor during intraoperative examinations. The mean (± SD) volumes of right and left ear mastoid air cells in patient and control groups were 6.92 ± 2.45 vs. 7.00 ± 2.59 cm3 and 9.04 ± 4.55 vs. 8.95 ± 4.53 cm3, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant. It was found that the level of mastoid pneumatization has no statistically significant effect on tympanic membrane pathologies due to blast or other injuries.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.