Abstract
With the proliferation of operations designed to treat cervical metastatic nodal disease, it has become ever apparent for the need to more clearly and precisely communicate the location of the metastatic cervical nodes and the specific surgery performed. To this end, this paper reviews the variety of operations and the resultant confusing terminology that has emerged over the past five decades. It is suggested that a simplified technology be used that specifically describes the nodal levels dissected, the relevant nonlymphatic structures removed, and those structures that are preserved. It is also suggested that the new imaging-based nodal classification be used to standardize the definition of the nodal levels. It is hoped that this approach will eliminate many of the often confusing and nondescriptive terms and there by facilitate better inter-physician and inter-institutional communication.