We studied the immunological and histopathological factors that affect the prognosis of chronic rhinosinusitis under long-term low-dose macrolide therapy. Sixteen patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were given 200 mg clarithromycin or 150 mg roxithromycin orally once a day without other concurrent treatments for 2–3 months. Measurement of the serum IgE level, blood cell count and differential leukocyte count of the peripheral blood, cytological assessment of the nasal smear and computed tomographic (CT) scans of the paranasal sinuses were performed before treatment. The opacity of the sinuses was estimated and scored by the CT images. After treatment, anterior ethmoidal mucosa samples were collected, an infiltrated inflammatory cells, interferon (IFN)-γ-positive cells and interleukin (IL)-4-positive cells were examined histologically and immunohistochemically. The severity of nasal symptoms was scored before and after treatment, and the improvement rate of the score (symptomatic improvement rate) was calculated. Patients with normal levels of serum IgE (≤250 U/ml) showed a significantly higher symptomatic improvement rate than those with high levels of serum IgE (42.1 ± 11.2 vs. 4.9 ± 3.1%, p = 0.046). The symptomatic improvement rate was inversely correlated with the eosinophil counts in the peripheral blood (r = –0.51, p = 0.04), in the nasal smear (r = –0.54, p = 0.045) and in the sinus mucosa (r = –0.54, p = 0.02). Meanwhile, the CT score, the number of IFN-γ-positive cells and IL-4-positive cells in the sinus mucosa and neutrophil counts in the nasal smear and in the sinus mucosa failed to correlate with the symptomatic improvement rate. These results suggest that macrolide therapy is indicated for patients without atopy or smear/tissue/peripheral blood eosinophilia. On the contrary, the severity of the disease, Th1/Th2 dominance in the sinus mucosa and neutrophilia are unlikely to be prognostic factors of chronic rhinosinusitis under long-term low-dose marolide therapy.

Keywords:
Chronic rhinosinusitis, Macrolide therapy, Prognostic factor, Eosinophil, Sinus mucosa, Immunoglobulin E
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.