More than 500, or 97% of all 3-year-old children in a Danish municipality, were seen in January 1976 for middle ear examination, including tympanometry. Persistently abnormal cases were checked at the same intervals during the subsequent 6 months, without treatment. Thus, the type and duration of impaired middle ear function in otherwise unselected 3-year olds were mapped. In order to investigate the long-term significance of middle ear pathology of various description in early childhood, the children were retested exactly 3 years later. The study revealed that even a most extensive programme of serial tympanometry at the age of 3 years could not distinguish all children who would have poor middle ear function and hearing loss at 6 years of age from the total group of normals. Therefore, a programme of screening 3-year olds by impedance tests cannot replace existing school screenings. Cases showing flat curves with gradients ≤ 0.1 at each retest during 3 months made up consistent middle ear pathology over a long period of time, giving the poorest prognosis: about 55% went on having a flat curve, and about 40% did not pass a puretone sweep test at the age of 6 years. 3-year olds with flat curves and a favorable long-term prognosis revealed themselves directly by showing a great test-retest instability of the tympanometric pattern. Even prolonged shifting between flat curves and a pronounced negative middle ear pressure during preschool age did not entail poor long-term prospect. The influence of these findings upon rational tightrope walking between expectation and therapeutic intervention in clinical pediatric otology and upon preschool impedance screening is outlined.

Keywords:
Middle ear disease, Preschool ages, Tympanometric screening, consecutive testing, Consistent pathology
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1982 S. Karger AG, Basel
1982
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.