Dry eye is the most prominent pathology among those involving the ocular surface: a decrease of the aqueous (less frequent) or the lipid (more frequent) component of the tear film is the cause of the diminished stability of tears that is observed in this pathology. Dry eye shows a clear distribution linked to both sex (being more frequent among women) and age (increasing with aging). Therefore, specific treatments taking into account the etiology of the disease would be desired. The role of lactoferrin and its functional mimetic lactobionic acid are reported here as a possible remedy for age-related dry eye.

The ocular surface is made up of the epithelial cells of the cornea and the conjunctiva and the tear film in which they are bathed and that protects them thanks to its mechanical (lubricating) and metabolic (nourishment) properties. The tear film contains 3 interconnected layers: the mucin layer next to the epithelial surface, the aqueous layer on top of it, and the lipid layer as the outermost one, preventing excessive evaporation of tears. If any of these 3 layers becomes deficient, the epithelial cells are damaged (by desiccation and by increased friction due to more frequent blinking on a dry surface) and an inflammatory reaction starts, with production of inflammatory mediators that can be found in the tear film and the tissues themselves, further damaging the epithelial layers and starting a vicious cycle that aggravates the pathology if not efficiently interrupted.

It is nowadays widely recognized that eye dryness is a multifactorial pathology finally leading to tear film insufficiency and signs and/or symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD). Therefore, treatment should be tailored to each patient trying to target the specific mechanisms involved in her/his peculiar disease [1, 2]. Inflammation is often a key driving mechanism in many cases of OSD, and therefore topical antinflammatory drugs (corticosteroids or non-steroidal antinflammatory drugs) are present in the market to treat this aspect of the pathology [3]. Cyclosporine can also be used to exploit its immune-modulating activity [4]. Antibiotics with antinflammatory action (such as azithromycin) may be used to treat Meibomian Gland Disease, often due to infective blepharitis [5]. Vitamins and antioxidants have been used to tackle the oxidative stress side of the disease [6]. Free amino-acids added to a lubricating agent such as hyaluronic acid improved its ability to attenuate signs and symptoms of dry eye [7]. Essential fatty acids (omega 3 and 6) may have antinflammatory and immune-modulatory activities, with a beneficial effect on dry eye pathology [8]. Hormone replacement therapy with androgens or estrogens take into account the influence of hormones on the homeostasis of the integrated system ocular surface/lacrimal glands [9]. Tear stimulating drugs (mucin secretagogues, muscarinic receptor agonists, stimulating exocrine glands activity) such as rebamipide can be used to try and increase the production of tear film components such as the mucous and the aqueous layers [10]. Homologous or heterologous serum derivatives are used as biological tear substitutes with promising results [11]. Relatively few studies have addressed the development of specific products for age related dry eye [12], which however is on the increase, due to the increasing life expectancy, at least in the western world.

Aging is one of the most frequent endogenous causes of dry eye. About 5–30% of the elderly show signs of eye dryness, the reported frequency being 8.4% below 60 years of age, 15% between 70 and 79 years, and 20% for individuals over 80 years; women, as expected, show a higher prevalence in all age groups [13, 14]. The higher risk of developing dry eye in the elderly may be due to several factors affecting the different layers of the tear film. The secretory function of the lacrimal gland, producing the aqueous component of the tear film, is regulated by androgens, the production of which is known to change with aging, more for women than for men [15]. Therefore, dry eye caused by lacrimal gland dysfunction is more common in females [16]. A higher incidence of autoimmune diseases (Sjogren syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis) correlates with aging, as well as a decreased corneal sensitivity, both causing  a decrease in tear production [17]. Deficient tear -production can also be caused by a chronic use of systemic and topic medications, which in the elderly accumulate over time, especially for those affected by glaucoma [18].

Mucin-producing goblet cells decrease their function with aging [19], and conjunctival cells become more susceptible to apoptosis [20]. This condition may lead to a decreased wettability of the ocular surface, which rapidly becomes dry, and to a diffuse damage of epithelial cells, finally leading to symptomatic eye dryness.

Tear film stability is also influenced by aging. Abnormal eye lid positioning (laxity, floppy eyelid syndrome, retraction and lagophthalmos), together with meibomian gland dysfunction, increase the rate of tear film evaporation, decreasing tear film breakup time. In fact, dry eye syndrome can be seen in as many as 50–70% of patients with eyelid malpositioning [21]. A dysfunction of the meibomian glands (producing the lipid layer of the tear film) is also observed with andropause or menopause and the corresponding alteration of sex hormones, leading to a thinning of the tear lipid layer and increased tear evaporation [22-24]. Other hormonal factors that may lead to eye dryness include the Growth Hormone/IGF-1 axis. Their secretion declines over time, until only low levels can be detected in individuals aged over 60 years [25]. This results in the inhibition of the Foxo1 gene, which in turn leads to decreased proliferation and lipogenesis in meibomian gland cells, increased apoptosis and delayed turnover [26].

Corneal sensitivity changes with aging, and in some cases a decreased sensitivity has been reported [27] with the expected result of a reduced feedback stimulating lacrimal gland secretion, while in other cases hypersensitivity has been noted [28]. In either case, the morphology of corneal nerves (a bead-like transformation) becomes altered with dry eye, most likely as a consequence of the inflammatory state present in the cornea, and the discomfort of the patient is increased [29].

Neurodegenerative diseases show an increased incidence with advancing age, and may favor the insurgence of dry eye. In Parkinson’s patients, a lower blink rate and a decreased corneal sensitivity have been reported, which may lead to increased evaporation and reduced tear secretion [30].

Protein content in the tear film may also change with ageing and dry eye, and very often a decrease in lactoferrin (Lf) and lysozyme is observed [31, 32].

The ocular surface is constantly exposed to the external environment, so that several bacterial strains establish a symbiotic relationship with it, similarly to what happens in the intestine. However, ocular infections are not as common as could be expected from this permanent exposure. In fact, ocular pathogens in order to succeed have to compete with the endogenous bacterial strains of the ocular surface [33], and escape from the defense proteins present in the tear film [34]. The main proteins of this class that are synthesized by cells residing in the eye are Lf, lysozyme, immunoglobulin-A and tear lipocalins [34]. Lacrimation and a regular turn-over of the tear film are critical to reintegrate the defense proteins in order to efficiently protect the ocular surface.

Tear Lf is mostly secreted by the main lacrimal gland [35], although both epithelial cells of the ocular surface [36] and meibomian glands [37] can also contribute to its final tear concentration. Lf is a glycoprotein belonging to the transferrin family of proteins, with a molecular mass of 80 kDa. Structurally, it contains two lobes joined by a peptide bridge that confers some flexibility to the molecule; each lobe has the capability of chelating one ferric ion (Fe+3), so that Lf forms complexes with ferric ions in the ratio 1: 2.

In the tear film, Lf has multiple roles: antinflammatory, antioxidant and antimicrobic.

The antinflammatory activity depends on Lf interaction with natural and induced immunity, and its ability to regulate inflammatory cytokine expression with the overall result of reducing inflammation [38]. The antioxidant and antimicrobial activities are linked to the iron-chelating ability of Lf, which prevents the formation of iron-dependent hydroxyl radicals that can be generated during an inflammatory response and by microbial infections [38, 39]. Moreover, since iron is a critical co-factor for bacterial growth and proliferation, the subtraction of iron by Lf has a limiting effect on bacterial survival. In addition, Lf also inhibits biofilm formation, and thus may play a role in protecting contact lens surfaces from microbic colonization [38].

Lf represents around 25% of tear proteins, with an average concentration in healthy subjects of 1.42 mg/mL [40]. Its concentration decreases with prolonged closure of the eyelids, as happens during sleep [41], when protection from external insults is not necessary. Ageing and some eye pathologies such as dry eye (Sjogren and -non-Sjogren), keratitis and conjunctivitis of different etiologies result in a decrease of tear Lf [42], so that these individuals become more susceptible to ocular infections [43].

In view of the relevant protective role that tear Lf has on the ocular surface, and its decrease with ageing and disease, several attempts have been made to replenish Lf in tears, however, so far these have not been successful since no topical treatment with exogenous Lf is available. However, oral supplementation of Lf has had some effect in attenuating dry eye induced by cataract surgery [44]. A possible alternative would be to find other molecules with an activity similar to that of Lf.

The molecule of lactobionic acid (LA) is made by a sugar (galactose) bound through an ether link to a poly-hydroxy acid (gluconic acid; Fig. 1). More generally, bionic acids are those formed by a poly-hydroxy acid and a sugar, where the “bi” indicates the presence of two moieties in the molecule. LA is formed via oxidation of lactose (the milk sugar; Fig. 1). In the skin, it can be enzymatically degraded to its constituents (galactose and gluconic acid), which are both molecules normally present in cells, so that their tolerability is quite high.

Fig. 1.

Biosynthesis of lactobionic acid (LA). The LA molecule is made of a sugar (galactose) bound by an ether link to a poly-hydroxy acid (gluconic acid). LA is formed via oxidation of lactose (the milk sugar) and it can be enzymatically degraded to its constituents (galactose and gluconic acid), which are both molecules normally present in cells, so that their tolerability is high.

Fig. 1.

Biosynthesis of lactobionic acid (LA). The LA molecule is made of a sugar (galactose) bound by an ether link to a poly-hydroxy acid (gluconic acid). LA is formed via oxidation of lactose (the milk sugar) and it can be enzymatically degraded to its constituents (galactose and gluconic acid), which are both molecules normally present in cells, so that their tolerability is high.

Close modal

Thanks to the many hydroxyl groups, LA has a very high water retention capacity and moisturizing ability [45]. Its antioxidant property mainly derives from its iron-chelating capability. LA forms 1: 1 chelating complexes with ferric ions [46]. Ferric ions may generate free hydroxyl radicals: iron chelation prevents this chemical reaction [47]. Therefore, these 2 abilities, anti-oxidant and hygroscopic, make LA an ideal molecule for anti-ageing cosmetic treatment [48] and for transplant organ preservation [49]. Moreover, since iron is a necessary metabolite for bacterial growth [50], it could be expected that LA, similarly to Lf, has antibacterial effects [51]. LA is even a more efficient iron chelator than Lf on a mass basis, since – given the much lower mw of LA (358 Da) with respect to Lf (80 kDa) – 1 mg of LA can chelate 112 times more iron than 1 mg of Lf, despite the fact that on a molar basis Lf chelates twice the amount of iron with respect to LA. Therefore, considering a physiological concentration of tear Lf of 1.4 mg/mL, a tear concentration of at least 0.21 mg/mL of LA would be enough to re-establish the iron chelating capability of Lf-depleted tears. Considering that about 5% of an artificial tear remains on the ocular surface after instillation, an LA concentration of at least 4 mg/mL would be advisable to reintegrate the missing Lf in tears of dry eye patients.

Finally, LA – similarly to other bionic acids – inhibits matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP) activity [52]. MMPs are enzymes that degrade collagen in the extracellular matrix as part of the natural process of collagen turnover. With ageing, and in cases of oxidative stress further to inflammatory events, there is an upregulation of MMPs and consequent collagen degradation [53]. Blocking MMP activity can help preserve existing collagen and maintain firmer and tighter skin. More specifically, after cutaneous administration of LA as a gel, the epidermis looked thicker and a strong inhibition of epidermal MMP9 was visible, together with an enhanced presence of hygroscopic glycosaminoglycans in the dermis and a general improvement of skin elasticity and smoothness [54].

Dry eye is a dynamic process involving the several structures forming the lacrimal functional unit, as originally described [55], and as such is almost impossible to reproduce in vitro. Therefore, several in vivo animal models have been developed in different species over time, to address the specific events leading to dry eye, either of the evaporative or secretory type [56]. Other models have rather been focused on the -inflammatory and immune-mediated processes behind  the development of dry eye [57], thus allowing to study the related processes and therapeutic approaches. However, to our knowledge, no animal models have been described to date, in which Lf deficiency is a major contributor to OSD and would thus allow to specifically address the efficacy of a Lf functional mimetic such as LA. The major source of tear Lf is the lacrimal gland, although both corneal and conjunctival cells in mammals [36, 58] are known to produce detectable amounts of Lf.

It would be interesting to see the effects of a conditional knockout of Lf in these tissues on the pathogenesis of dry eye, and – similarly – to see whether there are compounds that, given topically, may stimulate the production of endogenous Lf.

In conclusion, it is known that ageing results in the progressive impairment of several organs and tissues, including the eye and the ocular surface. Palliative medicine (there is no cure for ageing as yet) can try to replace, at best, those components that become altered with ageing and, in so doing, reduce the increasing risk of developing pathological degenerations.

Lf has been identified as one of the critical components in tears that becomes deficient with ageing and with progressive eye dryness, leaving the ocular surface at higher risk of infection. We propose here that LA could be used in artificial tears as a functional mimetic of Lf and a protective agent on the ocular surface (Fig. 2). In fact, it is endowed with hygroscopic, iron-chelating, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that make it an ideal candidate to counteract the effects of ageing on the ocular surface.

Fig. 2.

Molecular structure and biological functions of Lf compared to LA. Lactoferrin (Mw: 80,000 Da) is a critical component in tears with important biological activities, many of which are in common (in bold) with LA (Mw: 358 Da). LA could be used in artificial tears as a functional mimetic of Lf and a protective agent on the ocular surface. Lf, lactoferrin; LA, lactobionic acid; Mw, molecular weight; MMPs, matrix-metalloproteinases.

Fig. 2.

Molecular structure and biological functions of Lf compared to LA. Lactoferrin (Mw: 80,000 Da) is a critical component in tears with important biological activities, many of which are in common (in bold) with LA (Mw: 358 Da). LA could be used in artificial tears as a functional mimetic of Lf and a protective agent on the ocular surface. Lf, lactoferrin; LA, lactobionic acid; Mw, molecular weight; MMPs, matrix-metalloproteinases.

Close modal

Critical English proofreading of the manuscript by Dr. Antony Bridgewood is highly appreciated.

Dario Rusciano, Salvatore Pezzino, Melania Olivieri, Martina Cristaldi are full time employees of Sooft Italia SpA, an Italian pharmaceutical company that commercializes eye drops with LA.

Supported by a grant from the European Union and the Italian “Ministry for Instruction, University and Research (MIUR)” (PON01_00110; Rome, Italy).

Thulasi P, Djalilian AR: Update in current diagnostics and therapeutics of dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 2017; 124:S27–S33.
Nassiri N, Rodriguez Torres Y, Meyer Z, Beyer MA, Vellaichamy G, Dhaliwal AS, Chungfat N, Hwang FS: Current and emerging therapy of dry eye disease. Part A: pharmacological modalities. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2017; 12: 269–297.
Ridder W, Karsolia A: New drugs for the treatment of dry eye disease. Clin Optometry 2015; 7: 91–102.
Rhee MK, Mah FS: Clinical utility of cyclosporine (CsA) ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for symptomatic relief in people with chronic dry eye: a review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11: 1157–1166.
Veldman P, Colby K: Current evidence for topical azithromycin 1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of blepharitis and blepharitis-associated ocular dryness. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011; 51: 43–52.
Gatell-Tortajada J: Oral supplementation with a nutraceutical formulation containing omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants in a large series of patients with dry eye symptoms: results of a prospective study. Clin Interv Aging 2016; 11: 571–578.
Rusciano D, Roszkowska AM, Gagliano C, Pezzino S: Free amino acids: an innovative treatment for ocular surface disease. Eur J Pharmacol 2016; 787: 9–19.
Hom MM, Asbell P, Barry B: Omegas and dry eye: more knowledge, more questions. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 948–956.
Rusciano D, Pezzino S: Hormones and eye diseases. J Clin Mol Endocrinol 2016; 17: 1–3.
Kashima T, Itakura H, Akiyama H, Kishi S: Rebamipide ophthalmic suspension for the treatment of dry eye syndrome: a critical appraisal. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 1003–1010.
Giannaccare G, Versura P, Buzzi M, Primavera L, Pellegrini M, Campos EC: Blood derived eye drops for the treatment of cornea and ocular surface diseases. Transfus Apher Sci 2017; 56: 595–604.
Ding J, Sullivan DA: Aging and dry eye disease. Exp Gerontol 2012; 47: 483–490.
The epidemiology of dry eye disease: report of the Epidemiology Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf 2007; 5: 93–107.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE: Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1264–1268.
Sullivan DA, Wickham LA, Rocha EM, Kelleher RS, Silveira LAd, Toda I: Influence of Gender, Sex Steroid Hormones, and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis on the Structure and Function of the Lacrimal Gland; in Sullivan DA, Dartt DA, Meneray MA (eds): Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2. Boston, Springer, 1998, vol 438, pp 11–42.
Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR: Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 318–326.
Moerman RV, Bootsma H, Kroese FG, Vissink A: Sjogren’s syndrome in older patients: aetiology, diagnosis and management. Drugs Aging 2013; 30: 137–153.
Fraunfelder FT, Sciubba JJ, Mathers WD: The role of medications in causing dry eye. J Ophthalmol 2012; 2012: 285851.
Zhu W, Hong J, Zheng T, Le Q, Xu J, Sun X: Age-related changes of human conjunctiva on in vivo confocal microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1448–1453.
Giebel J, Woenckhaus C, Fabian M, Tost F: Age-related differential expression of apoptosis-related genes in conjunctival epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005; 83: 471–476.
Damasceno RW, Osaki MH, Dantas PE, Belfort R Jr: Involutional entropion and ectropion of the lower eyelid: prevalence and associated risk factors in the elderly population. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 27: 317–320.
Gagliano C, Caruso S, Napolitano G, Malaguarnera G, Cicinelli MV, Amato R, Reibaldi M, Incarbone G, Bucolo C, Drago F, Avitabile T: Low levels of 17-beta-oestradiol, oestrone and testosterone correlate with severe evaporative dysfunctional tear syndrome in postmenopausal women: a case-control study. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 371–376.
Sullivan DA, Jensen RV, Suzuki T, Richards SM: Do sex steroids exert sex-specific and/or opposite effects on gene expression in lacrimal and meibomian glands? Mol Vis 2009; 15: 1553–1572.
Suzuki T, Schirra F, Richards SM, Treister NS, Lombardi MJ, Rowley P, Jensen RV, Sullivan DA: Estrogen’s and progesterone’s impact on gene expression in the mouse lacrimal gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 158–168.
Junnila RK, List EO, Berryman DE, Murrey JW, Kopchick JJ: The GH/IGF-1 axis in ageing and longevity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2013; 9: 366–376.
Ding J, Sullivan DA: The effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 and growth hormone on human meibomian gland epithelial cells. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132: 593–599.
Bourcier T, Acosta MC, Borderie V, Borras F, Gallar J, Bury T, Laroche L, Belmonte C: Decreased corneal sensitivity in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2341–2345.
De Paiva CS, Pflugfelder SC: Corneal epitheliopathy of dry eye induces hyperesthesia to mechanical air jet stimulation. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 109–115.
Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfy MA, Fernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J: An in vivo confocal masked study on corneal epithelium and subbasal nerves in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3030–3035.
Reddy VC, Patel SV, Hodge DO, Leavitt JA: Corneal sensitivity, blink rate, and corneal nerve density in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson disease. Cornea 2013; 32: 631–635.
McGill JI, Liakos GM, Goulding N, Seal DV: Normal tear protein profiles and age-related changes. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; 68: 316–320.
Seal DV, McGill JI, Mackie IA, Liakos GM, Jacobs P, Goulding NJ: Bacteriology and tear protein profiles of the dry eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1986; 70: 122–125.
Kugadas A, Gadjeva M: Impact of Microbiome on Ocular Health. Ocul Surf 2016; 14: 342–349.
McDermott AM: Antimicrobial compounds in tears. Exp Eye Res 2013; 117: 53–61.
Janssen PT, van Bijsterveld OP: Origin and biosynthesis of human tear fluid proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24: 623–630.
Santagati MG, La Terra Mule S, Amico C, Pistone M, Rusciano D, Enea V: Lactoferrin expression by bovine ocular surface epithelia: a primary cell culture model to study lactoferrin gene promoter activity. Ophthalmic Res 2005; 37: 270–278.
Tsai PS, Evans JE, Green KM, Sullivan RM, Schaumberg DA, Richards SM, Dana MR, Sullivan DA: Proteomic analysis of human meibomian gland secretions. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 372–377.
Flanagan JL, Willcox MD: Role of lactoferrin in the tear film. Biochimie 2009; 91: 35–43.
Weinberg ED: Human lactoferrin: a novel therapeutic with broad spectrum potential. J Pharm Pharmacol 2001; 53: 1303–1310.
Janssen PT, van Bijsterveld OP: A simple test for lacrimal gland function: a tear lactoferrin assay by radial immunodiffusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983; 220: 171–174.
Willcox MD, Morris CA, Thakur A, Sack RA, Wickson J, Boey W: Complement and complement regulatory proteins in human tears. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 1–8.
Boukes RJ, Boonstra A, Breebaart AC, Reits D, Glasius E, Luyendyk L, Kijlstra A: Analysis of human tear protein profiles using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Doc Ophthalmol 1987; 67: 105–113.
Mashaghi A, Hong J, Chauhan SK, Dana R: Ageing and ocular surface immunity. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1–5.
Devendra J, Singh S: Effect of oral lactoferrin on cataract surgery induced dry eye: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9:NC06–NC09.
Tasic-Kostov M, Pavlovic D, Lukic M, Jaksic I, Arsic I, Savic S: Lactobionic acid as antioxidant and moisturizing active in alkyl polyglucoside-based topical emulsions: the colloidal structure, stability and efficacy evaluation. Int J Cosmet Sci 2012; 34: 424–434.
Escandar GM, Olivieri AC, Gonzalez-Sierra M, Sala LF: Iron(III) complexes of lactobionic acid: equilibrium and structural studies in aqueous solution. Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions 1994;1189–1192.
Charloux C, Paul M, Loisance D, Astier A: Inhibition of hydroxyl radical production by lactobionate, adenine, and tempol. Free Radic Biol Med 1995; 19: 699–704.
Grimes PE, Green BA, Wildnauer RH, Edison BL: The use of polyhydroxy acids (PHAs) in photoaged skin. Cutis 2004; 73: 3–13.
Ahmed I, Attia MS, Corps CL, Lodge JP, Potts DJ: Protective effects of lactobionate in modified phosphate-buffered sucrose. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 950–951.
Payne SM, Finkelstein RA: The critical role of iron in host-bacterial interactions. J Clin Invest 1978; 61: 1428–1440.
Islam S, Jarosch S, Zhou J, Parquet Mdel C, Toguri JT, Colp P, Holbein BE, Lehmann C: Anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial effects of iron chelation in experimental sepsis. J Surg Res 2016; 200: 266–273.
Upadhya GA, Strasberg SM: Glutathione, lactobionate, and histidine: cryptic inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases contained in University of Wisconsin and histidine/tryptophan/ketoglutarate liver preservation solutions. Hepatology 2000; 31: 1115–1122.
Pinnell SR: Cutaneous photodamage, oxidative stress, and topical antioxidant protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48: 1–19; quiz 20–12.
Green BA, Edison B, Sigler ML: Antiaging effects of topical lactobionic acid: Results of a controlled usage study. Cosmetic Dermatol 2008; 21: 76–82.
Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, Beuerman RW, Pflugfelder SC: The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78: 409–416.
Schrader S, Mircheff AK, Geerling G: Animal models of dry eye. Dev Ophthalmol 2008; 41: 298–312.
Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC: What We Have Learned From Animal Models of Dry Eye. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2017; 57: 109–118.
Rageh AA, Ferrington DA, Roehrich H, Yuan C, Terluk MR, Nelson EF, Montezuma SR: Lactoferrin Expression in Human and Murine Ocular Tissue. Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 883–889.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.